Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Rule-Based Reasoning


DAS: Intelligent Scheduling Systems for Shipbuilding

AI Magazine

Daewoo Shipbuilding Company, one of the largest shipbuilders in the world, has experienced great deal of trouble with the planning and scheduling of its production process. To solve the problems, from 1991 to 1993, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) and Daewoo jointly conducted the Daewoo Shipbuilding Scheduling (das) Project. To integrate the scheduling expert systems for shipbuilding, we used a hierarchical scheduling architecture. To automate the dynamic spatial layout of objects in various areas of the shipyard, we developed spatial scheduling expert systems. For reliable estimation of person-hour requirements, we implemented the neural network-based person-hour estimator. In addition, we developed the paneled-block assembly shop scheduler and the long-range production planner. For this large-scale project, we devised a phased development strategy consisting of three phases: (1) vision revelation, (2) data-dependent realization, and (3) prospective enhancement. The DAS systems were successfully launched in January 1994 and are actively being used as indispensable systems in the shipyard, resulting in significant improvement in productivity and visible and positive effects in many areas.


Rule-based Machine Learning Methods for Functional Prediction

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

We describe a machine learning method for predicting the value of a real-valued function, given the values of multiple input variables. The method induces solutions from samples in the form of ordered disjunctive normal form (DNF) decision rules. A central objective of the method and representation is the induction of compact, easily interpretable solutions. This rule-based decision model can be extended to search efficiently for similar cases prior to approximating function values. Experimental results on real-world data demonstrate that the new techniques are competitive with existing machine learning and statistical methods and can sometimes yield superior regression performance.


An Integrated Framework for Learning and Reasoning

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Learning and reasoning are both aspects of what is considered to be intelligence. Their studies within AI have been separated historically, learning being the topic of machine learning and neural networks, and reasoning falling under classical (or symbolic) AI. However, learning and reasoning are in many ways interdependent. This paper discusses the nature of some of these interdependencies and proposes a general framework called FLARE, that combines inductive learning using prior knowledge together with reasoning in a propositional setting. Several examples that test the framework are presented, including classical induction, many important reasoning protocols and two simple expert systems.


Countrywide Loan-Underwriting Expert System

AI Magazine

Countrywide loan-underwriting expert system (clues) is an advanced, automated mortgage-underwriting rule-based expert system. The system was developed to increase the production capacity and productivity of Countrywide branches, improve the consistency of underwriting, and reduce the cost of originating a loan. The system receives selected information from the loan application, credit report, and appraisal. It then decides whether the loan should be approved or whether it requires further review by a human underwriter. If the system approves the loan, no further review is required, and the application is funded. clues has been in operation since February 1993 and is currently processing more than 8500 loans each month in over 300 decentralized branches around the country.


Functional Models of Selective Attention and Context Dependency

Neural Information Processing Systems

Scope This workshop reviewed and classified the various models which have emerged from the general concept of selective attention and context dependency, and sought to identify their commonalities. It was concluded that the motivation and mechanism of these functional models are "efficiency" and ''factoring'', respectively. The workshop focused on computational models of selective attention and context dependency within the realm of neural networks. We treated only ''functional'' models; computational models of biological neural systems, and symbolic or rule-based systems were omitted from the discussion. Presentations Thomas H. Hildebrandt presented the results of his recent survey of the literature on functional models of selective attention and context dependency.



Functional Models of Selective Attention and Context Dependency

Neural Information Processing Systems

Scope This workshop reviewed and classified the various models which have emerged from the general concept of selective attention and context dependency, and sought to identify their commonalities. It was concluded that the motivation and mechanism of these functional models are "efficiency" and ''factoring'', respectively. The workshop focused on computational models of selective attention and context dependency within the realm of neural networks. We treated only ''functional'' models; computational models of biological neural systems, and symbolic or rule-based systems were omitted from the discussion. Presentations Thomas H. Hildebrandt presented the results of his recent survey of the literature on functional models of selective attention and context dependency.



Functional Models of Selective Attention and Context Dependency

Neural Information Processing Systems

Scope This workshop reviewed and classified the various models which have emerged from the general concept of selective attention and context dependency, and sought to identify their commonalities. It was concluded that the motivation and mechanism ofthese functional models are "efficiency" and ''factoring'', respectively. The workshop focused on computational models of selective attention and context dependency withinthe realm of neural networks. We treated only ''functional'' models; computational models of biological neural systems, and symbolic or rule-based systems were omitted from the discussion. Presentations Thomas H. Hildebrandt presented the results of his recent survey of the literature onfunctional models of selective attention and context dependency.