Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Rule-Based Reasoning


Model-Based Diagnosis under Real-World Constraints

AI Magazine

I report on my experience over the past few years in introducing automated, model-based diagnostic technologies into industrial settings. In partic-ular, I discuss the competition that this technology has been receiving from handcrafted, rule-based diagnostic systems that has set some high standards that must be met by model-based systems before they can be viewed as viable alternatives. The battle between model-based and rule-based approaches to diagnosis has been over in the academic literature for many years, but the situation is different in industry where rule-based systems are dominant and appear to be attractive given the considerations of efficiency, embeddability, and cost effectiveness. My goal in this article is to provide a perspective on this competition and discuss a diagnostic tool, called DTOOL/CNETS, that I have been developing over the years as I tried to address the major challenges posed by rule-based systems. In particular, I discuss three major features of the developed tool that were either adopted, designed, or innovated to address these challenges: (1) its compositional modeling approach, (2) its structure-based computational approach, and (3) its ability to synthesize embeddable diagnostic systems for a variety of software and hardware platforms.


Viewing Classifier Systems as Model Free Learning in POMDPs

Neural Information Processing Systems

Classifier systems are now viewed disappointing because of their problems such as the rule strength vs rule set performance problem and the credit assignment problem. In order to solve the problems, we have developed a hybrid classifier system: GLS (Generalization Learning System). In designing GLS, we view CSs as model free learning in POMDPs and take a hybrid approach to finding the best generalization, given the total number of rules. GLS uses the policy improvement procedure by Jaakkola et al. for an locally optimal stochastic policy when a set of rule conditions is given. GLS uses GA to search for the best set of rule conditions. 1 INTRODUCTION Classifier systems (CSs) (Holland 1986) have been among the most used in reinforcement learning.


Viewing Classifier Systems as Model Free Learning in POMDPs

Neural Information Processing Systems

Classifier systems are now viewed disappointing because of their problems such as the rule strength vs rule set performance problem and the credit assignment problem. In order to solve the problems, we have developed a hybrid classifier system: GLS (Generalization Learning System). In designing GLS, we view CSs as model free learning in POMDPs and take a hybrid approach to finding the best generalization, given the total number of rules. GLS uses the policy improvement procedure by Jaakkola et al. for an locally optimal stochastic policy when a set of rule conditions is given. GLS uses GA to search for the best set of rule conditions. 1 INTRODUCTION Classifier systems (CSs) (Holland 1986) have been among the most used in reinforcement learning.


Viewing Classifier Systems as Model Free Learning in POMDPs

Neural Information Processing Systems

Classifier systems are now viewed disappointing because of their problems suchas the rule strength vs rule set performance problem and the credit assignment problem. In order to solve the problems, we have developed ahybrid classifier system: GLS (Generalization Learning System). In designing GLS, we view CSs as model free learning in POMDPs and take a hybrid approach to finding the best generalization, given the total number of rules. GLS uses the policy improvement procedure by Jaakkola et al. for an locally optimal stochastic policy when a set of rule conditions is given. GLS uses GA to search for the best set of rule conditions. 1 INTRODUCTION Classifier systems (CSs) (Holland 1986) have been among the most used in reinforcement learning.


AI in Medicine: The Spectrum of Challenges from Managed Care to Molecular Medicine

AI Magazine

AI has embraced medical applications from its inception, and some of the earliest work in successful application of AI technology occurred in medical contexts. Medicine in the twenty-first century will be very different than medicine in the late twentieth century. Fortunately, the technical challenges to AI that emerge are similar, and the prospects for success are high.


Automated Intelligent Pilots for Combat Flight Simulation

AI Magazine

TACAIR-SOAR is an intelligent, rule-based system that generates believable humanlike behavior for large-scale, distributed military simulations. The system is capable of executing most of the airborne missions that the U.S. military flies in fixed-wing aircraft. It accomplishes its missions by integrating a wide variety of intelligent capabilities, including real-time hierarchical execution of complex goals and plans, communication and coordination with humans and simulated entities, maintenance of situational awareness, and the ability to accept and respond to new orders while in flight. The system is currentl y deployed at the Oceana Naval Air Station WISSARD (what-if simulation system for advanced research and development) Lab and the Air Force Research Laboratory in Mesa, Arizona.


Automated Intelligent Pilots for Combat Flight Simulation

AI Magazine

TACAIR-SOAR is an intelligent, rule-based system that generates believable humanlike behavior for large-scale, distributed military simulations. The innovation of the application is primarily a matter of scale and integration. The system is capable of executing most of the airborne missions that the U.S. military flies in fixed-wing aircraft. It accomplishes its missions by integrating a wide variety of intelligent capabilities, including real-time hierarchical execution of complex goals and plans, communication and coordination with humans and simulated entities, maintenance of situational awareness, and the ability to accept and respond to new orders while in flight. The system is currentl y deployed at the Oceana Naval Air Station WISSARD (what-if simulation system for advanced research and development) Lab and the Air Force Research Laboratory in Mesa, Arizona. Its most dramatic use was in the Synthetic Theater of War 1997, which was an operational training exercise that ran for 48 continuous hours during which TACAIR-SOAR flew all U.S. fixed-wing aircraft.




Bach in a Box - Real-Time Harmony

Neural Information Processing Systems

The learning and inferencing algorithms presented here speak an extended form of the classical figured bass representation common in Bach's time. Paired with a melody, figured bass provides a sufficient amount of information to reconstruct the harmonic content of a piece of music. Figured bass has several characteristics which make it well-disposed to learning rules. It is a symbolic format which uses a relatively small alphabet of symbols. It is also hierarchical - it specifies first the chord function that is to be played at the current note/timestep, then the scale step to be played by the bass voice, then additional information as needed to specify the alto and tenor scale steps. This allows our algorithm to fire sets of rules sequentially, to first determine the chord function which should be associated with a new melody note, and then to use that chord function as an input attribute to subsequent rulebases which determine the bass, alto, and tenor scale steps. In this way we can build up the final chord from simpler pieces, each governed by a specialized rulebase.