Knowledge Graphs (KGs) extracted from text sources are often noisy and lead to poor performance in downstream application tasks such as KG-based question answering.While much of the recent activity is focused on addressing the sparsity of KGs by using embeddings for inferring new facts, the issue of cleaning up of noise in KGs through KG refinement task is not as actively studied. Most successful techniques for KG refinement make use of inference rules and reasoning over ontologies. Barring a few exceptions, embeddings do not make use of ontological information, and their performance in KG refinement task is not well understood. In this paper, we present a KG refinement framework called IterefinE which iteratively combines the two techniques - one which uses ontological information and inferences rules, PSL-KGI, and the KG embeddings such as ComplEx and ConvE which do not. As a result, IterefinE is able to exploit not only the ontological information to improve the quality of predictions, but also the power of KG embeddings which (implicitly) perform longer chains of reasoning. The IterefinE framework, operates in a co-training mode and results in explicit type-supervised embedding of the refined KG from PSL-KGI which we call as TypeE-X. Our experiments over a range of KG benchmarks show that the embeddings that we produce are able to reject noisy facts from KG and at the same time infer higher quality new facts resulting in up to 9% improvement of overall weighted F1 score

Learning classifier systems (LCSs) originated from cognitive-science research but migrated such that LCS became powerful classification techniques. Modern LCSs can be used to extract building blocks of knowledge to solve more difficult problems in the same or a related domain. Recent works on LCSs showed that the knowledge reuse through the adoption of Code Fragments, GP-like tree-based programs, into LCSs could provide advances in scaling. However, since solving hard problems often requires constructing high-level building blocks, which also results in an intractable search space, a limit of scaling will eventually be reached. Inspired by human problem-solving abilities, XCSCF* can reuse learned knowledge and learned functionality to scale to complex problems by transferring them from simpler problems using layered learning. However, this method was unrefined and suited to only the Multiplexer problem domain. In this paper, we propose improvements to XCSCF* to enable it to be robust across multiple problem domains. This is demonstrated on the benchmarks Multiplexer, Carry-one, Majority-on, and Even-parity domains. The required base axioms necessary for learning are proposed, methods for transfer learning in LCSs developed and learning recast as a decomposition into a series of subordinate problems. Results show that from a conventional tabula rasa, with only a vague notion of what subordinate problems might be relevant, it is possible to capture the general logic behind the tested domains, so the advanced system is capable of solving any individual n-bit Multiplexer, n-bit Carry-one, n-bit Majority-on, or n-bit Even-parity problem.

Since the beginnings of artificial intelligence, researchers have long sought to test the intelligence of machine systems by having them play games against humans. It is often thought that one of the hallmarks of human intelligence is the ability to think creatively, consider various possibilities, and keep a long-term goal in mind while making short-term decisions. If computers can play difficult games just as well as humans then surely they can handle even more complicated tasks. From early checkers-playing bots developed in the 1950s to today's deep learning-powered bots that can beat even the best players in the world at games like chess, Go and DOTA, the idea of machines that can find solutions to puzzles is as old as AI itself, if not older. As such, it makes sense that one of the core patterns of AI that organizations develop is the goal-driven systems pattern.

The significant advances in autonomous systems together with an immensely wider application domain have increased the need for trustable intelligent systems. Explainable artificial intelligence is gaining considerable attention among researchers and developers to address this requirement. Although there is an increasing number of works on interpretable and transparent machine learning algorithms, they are mostly intended for the technical users. Explanations for the end-user have been neglected in many usable and practical applications. In this work, we present the Contextual Importance (CI) and Contextual Utility (CU) concepts to extract explanations that are easily understandable by experts as well as novice users. This method explains the prediction results without transforming the model into an interpretable one. We present an example of providing explanations for linear and non-linear models to demonstrate the generalizability of the method. CI and CU are numerical values that can be represented to the user in visuals and natural language form to justify actions and explain reasoning for individual instances, situations, and contexts. We show the utility of explanations in car selection example and Iris flower classification by presenting complete (i.e. the causes of an individual prediction) and contrastive explanation (i.e. contrasting instance against the instance of interest). The experimental results show the feasibility and validity of the provided explanation methods.

Artificial Intelligence is everywhere, opportunities are in abundance for cognitive enterprises. What do we mean by cognitive enterprises? Millions of ideas and think pieces are waiting to grow luxuriantly and cognitive AI technologies will play a bigger role in turning your ideas into a live piece of work. It is expected that AI will bring simplicity to complex business issues and deliver more useful, engaging, intuitive, and profitable solutions, and this is what we say a cognitive approach for enterprises. According to a report published by IDC a market research firm states that global spending on cognitive AI systems will reach $57.6 billion by 2021. Biggest investors in cognitive AI systems are banking, retail, and manufacturing firms.

The workshop marked the official beginning of AI history. But as the two-month effort--and many others that followed--only proved that human intelligence is very complicated, and the complexity becomes more evident as you try to replicate it. That is why, despite six decades of research and development, we still don't have AI that rivals the cognitive abilities of a human child, let alone one that can think like an adult. What we do have, however, is a field of science that is split into two different categories: artificial narrow intelligence (ANI), what we have today, and artificial general intelligence (AGI), what we hope to achieve. Defining artificial general intelligence is very difficult.

For language-capable interactive robots to be effectively introduced into human society, they must be able to naturally and efficiently communicate about the objects, locations, and people found in human environments. An important aspect of natural language communication is the use of pronouns. Ac-cording to the linguistic theory of the Givenness Hierarchy(GH), humans use pronouns due to implicit assumptions about the cognitive statuses their referents have in the minds of their conversational partners. In previous work, Williams et al. presented the first computational implementation of the full GH for the purpose of robot language understanding, leveraging a set of rules informed by the GH literature. However, that approach was designed specifically for language understanding,oriented around GH-inspired memory structures used to assess what entities are candidate referents given a particular cognitive status. In contrast, language generation requires a model in which cognitive status can be assessed for a given entity. We present and compare two such models of cognitive status: a rule-based Finite State Machine model directly informed by the GH literature and a Cognitive Status Filter designed to more flexibly handle uncertainty. The models are demonstrated and evaluated using a silver-standard English subset of the OFAI Multimodal Task Description Corpus.

If anything, the importance and potential of Artificial Intelligence in the KYC space is underplayed and underrated. The industry has been under immense pressure in the past couple of years with regulations and scandals redefining the means and ways you go about Know Your Customer procedures. In the midst of this disarray, AI has emerged as the guiding light, the savior the compliance space was calling for. What does AI mean for compliance, what's the role of this new3 technology and what problems does it really solve? The idea that Artificial Intelligence will replace humans is ignorant, to say the least.

Multitask Learning is a learning paradigm that deals with multiple different tasks in parallel and transfers knowledge among them. XOF, a Learning Classifier System using tree-based programs to encode building blocks (meta-features), constructs and collects features with rich discriminative information for classification tasks in an observed list. This paper seeks to facilitate the automation of feature transferring in between tasks by utilising the observed list. We hypothesise that the best discriminative features of a classification task carry its characteristics. Therefore, the relatedness between any two tasks can be estimated by comparing their most appropriate patterns. We propose a multiple-XOF system, called mXOF, that can dynamically adapt feature transfer among XOFs. This system utilises the observed list to estimate the task relatedness. This method enables the automation of transferring features. In terms of knowledge discovery, the resemblance estimation provides insightful relations among multiple data. We experimented mXOF on various scenarios, e.g. representative Hierarchical Boolean problems, classification of distinct classes in the UCI Zoo dataset, and unrelated tasks, to validate its abilities of automatic knowledge-transfer and estimating task relatedness. Results show that mXOF can estimate the relatedness reasonably between multiple tasks to aid the learning performance with the dynamic feature transferring.

Reasoning over streams of input data is an essential part of human intelligence. During the last decade {\em stream reasoning} has emerged as a research area within the AI-community with many potential applications. In fact, the increased availability of streaming data via services like Google and Facebook has raised the need for reasoning engines coping with data that changes at high rate. Recently, the rule-based formalism {\em LARS} for non-monotonic stream reasoning under the answer set semantics has been introduced. Syntactically, LARS programs are logic programs with negation incorporating operators for temporal reasoning, most notably {\em window operators} for selecting relevant time points. Unfortunately, by preselecting {\em fixed} intervals for the semantic evaluation of programs, the rigid semantics of LARS programs is not flexible enough to {\em constructively} cope with rapidly changing data dependencies. Moreover, we show that defining the answer set semantics of LARS in terms of FLP reducts leads to undesirable circular justifications similar to other ASP extensions. This paper fixes all of the aforementioned shortcomings of LARS. More precisely, we contribute to the foundations of stream reasoning by providing an operational fixed point semantics for a fully flexible variant of LARS and we show that our semantics is sound and constructive in the sense that answer sets are derivable bottom-up and free of circular justifications.