Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a declarative problem solving paradigm that can be used to encode a combinatorial problem as a logic program whose stable models correspond to the solutions of the considered problem. ASP has been widely applied to various domains in AI and beyond. The question "What can be said about stable models of a logic program from its static information?" has been investigated and proved useful in many circumstances. In this work, we dive into this direction more deeply by making the connection between a logic program and a Boolean network, which is a prominent modeling framework with applications to various areas. The proposed connection can bring the existing results in the rich history on static analysis of Boolean networks to explore and prove more theoretical results on ASP, making it become a unified and powerful tool to further study the static analysis of ASP. In particular, the newly obtained insights have the potential to benefit many problems in the field of ASP.

In pioneering work from 2019, Barcel\'o and coauthors identified logics that precisely match the expressive power of constant iteration-depth graph neural networks (GNNs) relative to properties definable in first-order logic. In this article, we give exact logical characterizations of recurrent GNNs in two scenarios: (1) in the setting with floating-point numbers and (2) with reals. For floats, the formalism matching recurrent GNNs is a rule-based modal logic with counting, while for reals we use a suitable infinitary modal logic, also with counting. These results give exact matches between logics and GNNs in the recurrent setting without relativising to a background logic in either case, but using some natural assumptions about floating-point arithmetic. Applying our characterizations, we also prove that, relative to graph properties definable in monadic second-order logic (MSO), our infinitary and rule-based logics are equally expressive. This implies that recurrent GNNs with reals and floats have the same expressive power over MSO-definable properties and shows that, for such properties, also recurrent GNNs with reals are characterized by a (finitary!) rule-based modal logic. In the general case, in contrast, the expressive power with floats is weaker than with reals. In addition to logic-oriented results, we also characterize recurrent GNNs, with both reals and floats, via distributed automata, drawing links to distributed computing models.

Reactive synthesis is the process of generating correct controllers from temporal logic specifications. Classical LTL reactive synthesis handles (propositional) LTL as a specification language. Boolean abstractions allow reducing LTLt specifications (i.e., LTL with propositions replaced by literals from a theory calT), into equi-realizable LTL specifications. In this paper we extend these results into a full static synthesis procedure. The synthesized system receives from the environment valuations of variables from a rich theory calT and outputs valuations of system variables from calT. We use the abstraction method to synthesize a reactive Boolean controller from the LTL specification, and we combine it with functional synthesis to obtain a static controller for the original LTLt specification. We also show that our method allows responses in the sense that the controller can optimize its outputs in order to e.g., always provide the smallest safe values. This is the first full static synthesis method for LTLt, which is a deterministic program (hence predictable and efficient).

We investigate Petri nets with data, an extension of plain Petri nets where tokens carry values from an infinite data domain, and executability of transitions is conditioned by equalities between data values. We provide a decision procedure for the bi-reachability problem: given a Petri net and its two configurations, we ask if each of the configurations is reachable from the other. This pushes forward the decidability borderline, as the bi-reachability problem subsumes the coverability problem (which is known to be decidable) and is subsumed by the reachability problem (whose decidability status is unknown).

Language models (LMs) are often expected to generate strings in some formal language; for example, structured data, API calls, or code snippets. Although LMs can be tuned to improve their adherence to formal syntax, this does not guarantee conformance, especially with smaller LMs suitable for large-scale deployment. In addition, tuning requires significant resources, making it impractical for uncommon or task-specific formats. To prevent downstream parsing errors we would ideally constrain the LM to only produce valid output, but this is severely complicated by tokenization, which is typically both ambiguous and misaligned with the formal grammar. We solve these issues through the application of automata theory, deriving an efficient closed-form solution for the regular languages, a broad class of formal languages with many practical applications, including API calls or schema-guided JSON and YAML. We also discuss pragmatic extensions for coping with the issue of high branching factor. Finally, we extend our techniques to deterministic context-free languages, which similarly admit an efficient closed-form solution. In spite of its flexibility and representative power, our approach only requires access to per-token decoding logits and lowers into simple calculations that are independent of LM size, making it both efficient and easy to apply to almost any LM architecture.

LambdaBeam is a state-of-the-art execution-guided algorithm for program synthesis that incorporates higher-order functions, lambda functions, and iterative loops into the Domain-Specific Language (DSL). LambdaBeam generates every program from the start. Yet, many program blocks or subprograms occur frequently in a given domain, e.g., loops to traverse a list. Thus, repeating programs can be used to enhance the synthesis algorithm. However, LambdaBeam fails to leverage this potential. For this purpose, we introduce AbstractBeam: A novel program synthesis framework that employs Library Learning to identify such program repetitions, integrates them into the DSL, and thus utilizes their potential to boost LambdaBeam's synthesis algorithm. Our experimental evaluations demonstrate that AbstractBeam significantly improves LambdaBeam's performance in the LambdaBeam integer list manipulation domain. Additionally, AbstractBeam's program generation is more efficient compared to LambdaBeam's synthesis. Finally, our findings indicate that Library Learning is effective in domains not specifically crafted to highlight its benefits.

This note presents a historical survey of informal semantics that are associated with logic programming under answer set semantics. We review these in uniform terms and align them with two paradigms: Answer Set Programming and ASP-Prolog -- two prominent Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Paradigms in Artificial Intelligence. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).

To achieve the best performance, automatic theorem provers often rely on schedules of diverse proving strategies to be tried out (either sequentially or in parallel) on a given problem. In this paper, we report on a large-scale experiment with discovering strategies for the Vampire prover, targeting the FOF fragment of the TPTP library and constructing a schedule for it, based on the ideas of Andrei Voronkov's system Spider. We examine the process from various angles, discuss the difficulty (or ease) of obtaining a strong Vampire schedule for the CASC competition, and establish how well a schedule can be expected to generalize to unseen problems and what factors influence this property.

We introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, collectively referred to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. These Ensuring that AI systems reliably and robustly approaches aim to provide high-assurance quantitative guarantees avoid harmful or dangerous behaviours is a crucial about the safety of an AI system's behaviour through challenge, especially for AI systems with a the use of three core components -- a formal safety specification, high degree of autonomy and general intelligence, a world model, and a verifier. We will argue that this or systems used in safety-critical contexts. In strategy is both promising and underexplored, and contrast it this position paper, we will introduce and define with other ongoing efforts in AI safety. We will also outline a family of approaches to AI safety, which we several ongoing avenues of research within the broader GS will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core research agenda, identify some of their core difficulties, and feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce discuss approaches for overcoming these difficulties. Central AI systems which are equipped with highassurance examples of agendas which fall under the GS AI family quantitative safety guarantees. This include Szegedy (2020); Wing (2021); Seshia et al. (2022); is achieved by the interplay of three core components: Russell (2022); Tegmark & Omohundro (2023); 'davidad' a world model (which provides a mathematical Dalrymple (2024); Bengio (2024).

The ability to generate artificial human movement patterns while meeting location and time constraints is an important problem in the security community, particularly as it enables the study of the analog problem of detecting such patterns while maintaining privacy. We frame this problem as an instance of abduction guided by a novel parsimony function represented as an aggregate truth value over an annotated logic program. This approach has the added benefit of affording explainability to an analyst user. By showing that any subset of such a program can provide a lower bound on this parsimony requirement, we are able to abduce movement trajectories efficiently through an informed (i.e., A*) search. We describe how our implementation was enhanced with the application of multiple techniques in order to be scaled and integrated with a cloud-based software stack that included bottom-up rule learning, geolocated knowledge graph retrieval/management, and interfaces with government systems for independently conducted government-run tests for which we provide results. We also report on our own experiments showing that we not only provide exact results but also scale to very large scenarios and provide realistic agent trajectories that can go undetected by machine learning anomaly detectors.