We present a formal model to represent and solve the unicast/multicast routing problem in networks with Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. To attain this, first we translate the network adapting it to a weighted graph (unicast) or and-or graph (multicast), where the weight on a connector corresponds to the multidimensional cost of sending a packet on the related network link: each component of the weights vector represents a different QoS metric value (e.g. bandwidth, cost, delay, packet loss). The second step consists in writing this graph as a program in Soft Constraint Logic Programming (SCLP): the engine of this framework is then able to find the best paths/trees by optimizing their costs and solving the constraints imposed on them (e.g. delay < 40msec), thus finding a solution to QoS routing problems. Moreover, c-semiring structures are a convenient tool to model QoS metrics. At last, we provide an implementation of the framework over scale-free networks and we suggest how the performance can be improved.

A first-order conditional logic is considered, with semantics given by a variant of ǫ-semantics (Adams 1975; Goldszmidt & Pearl 1992), where ϕ ψ means that Pr(ψ ϕ) approaches 1 super-polynomially--faster than any inverse polynomial. This type of convergence is needed for reasoning about security protocols. A complete axiomatization is provided for this semantics, and it is shown how a qualitative proof of the correctness of a security protocol can be automatically converted to a quantitative proof appropriate for reasoning about concrete security.

The methods used to establish PSPACE-bounds for modal logics can roughly be grouped into two classes: syntax driven methods establish that exhaustive proof search can be performed in polynomial space whereas semantic approaches directly construct shallow models. In this paper, we follow the latter approach and establish generic PSPACE-bounds for a large and heterogeneous class of modal logics in a coalgebraic framework. In particular, no complete axiomatisation of the logic under scrutiny is needed. This does not only complement our earlier, syntactic, approach conceptually, but also covers a wide variety of new examples which are difficult to harness by purely syntactic means. Apart from re-proving known complexity bounds for a large variety of structurally different logics, we apply our method to obtain previously unknown PSPACE-bounds for Elgesem's logic of agency and for graded modal logic over reflexive frames.

Selman and Kautz's work on ``knowledge compilation'' established how approximation (strengthening and/or weakening) of a propositional knowledge-base can be used to speed up query processing, at the expense of completeness. In this classical approach, querying uses Horn over- and under-approximations of a given knowledge-base, which is represented as a propositional formula in conjunctive normal form (CNF). Along with the class of Horn functions, one could imagine other Boolean function classes that might serve the same purpose, owing to attractive deduction-computational properties similar to those of the Horn functions. Indeed, Zanuttini has suggested that the class of affine Boolean functions could be useful in knowledge compilation and has presented an affine approximation algorithm. Since CNF is awkward for presenting affine functions, Zanuttini considers both a sets-of-models representation and the use of modulo 2 congruence equations. In this paper, we propose an algorithm based on reduced ordered binary decision diagrams (ROBDDs). This leads to a representation which is more compact than the sets of models and, once we have established some useful properties of affine Boolean functions, a more efficient algorithm.

Markov decision processes capture sequential decision making under uncertainty, where an agent must choose actions so as to optimize long term reward. The paper studies efficient reasoning mechanisms for Relational Markov Decision Processes (RMDP) where world states have an internal relational structure that can be naturally described in terms of objects and relations among them. Two contributions are presented. First, the paper develops First Order Decision Diagrams (FODD), a new compact representation for functions over relational structures, together with a set of operators to combine FODDs, and novel reduction techniques to keep the representation small. Second, the paper shows how FODDs can be used to develop solutions for RMDPs, where reasoning is performed at the abstract level and the resulting optimal policy is independent of domain size (number of objects) or instantiation. In particular, a variant of the value iteration algorithm is developed by using special operations over FODDs, and the algorithm is shown to converge to the optimal policy.

We give a brief overview of the main characteristics of diagrammatic reasoning, analyze a case of human reasoning in a mastermind game, and explain why hybrid representation systems (HRS) are particularly attractive and promising for Artificial General Intelligence and Computer Science in general.

Disjunctive Logic Programming (DLP) is a very expressive formalism: it allows for expressing every property of finite structures that is decidable in the complexity class SigmaP2 (= NP^NP). Despite this high expressiveness, there are some simple properties, often arising in real-world applications, which cannot be encoded in a simple and natural manner. Especially properties that require the use of arithmetic operators (like sum, times, or count) on a set or multiset of elements, which satisfy some conditions, cannot be naturally expressed in classic DLP. To overcome this deficiency, we extend DLP by aggregate functions in a conservative way. In particular, we avoid the introduction of constructs with disputed semantics, by requiring aggregates to be stratified. We formally define the semantics of the extended language (called DLP^A), and illustrate how it can be profitably used for representing knowledge. Furthermore, we analyze the computational complexity of DLP^A, showing that the addition of aggregates does not bring a higher cost in that respect. Finally, we provide an implementation of DLP^A in DLV -- a state-of-the-art DLP system -- and report on experiments which confirm the usefulness of the proposed extension also for the efficiency of computation.

Levesque proposed a generalization of a database called a proper knowledge base (KB), which is equivalent to a possibly infinite consistent set of ground literals. In contrast to databases, proper KBs do not make the closed-world assumption and hence the entailment problem becomes undecidable. Levesque then proposed a limited but efficient inference method V for proper KBs, which is sound and, when the query is in a certain normal form, also logically complete. He conjectured that for every first-order query there is an equivalent one in normal form. In this note, we show that this conjecture is false. In fact, we show that any class of formulas for which V is complete must be strictly less expressive than full first-order logic. Moreover, in the propositional case it is very unlikely that a formula always has a polynomial-size normal form.

The saturation-based reasoning methods are among the most theoretically developed ones and are used by most of the state-of-the-art first-order logic reasoners. In the last decade there was a sharp increase in performance of such systems, which I attribute to the use of advanced calculi and the intensified research in implementation techniques. However, nowadays we are witnessing a slowdown in performance progress, which may be considered as a sign that the saturation-based technology is reaching its inherent limits. The position I am trying to put forward in this paper is that such scepticism is premature and a sharp improvement in performance may potentially be reached by adopting new architectural principles for saturation. The top-level algorithms and corresponding designs used in the state-of-the-art saturation-based theorem provers have (at least) two inherent drawbacks: the insufficient flexibility of the used inference selection mechanisms and the lack of means for intelligent prioritising of search directions. In this position paper I analyse these drawbacks and present two ideas on how they could be overcome. In particular, I propose a flexible low-cost high-precision mechanism for inference selection, intended to overcome problems associated with the currently used instances of clause selection-based procedures. I also outline a method for intelligent prioritising of search directions, based on probing the search space by exploring generalised search directions. I discuss some technical issues related to implementation of the proposed architectural principles and outline possible solutions.

The notion of strong equivalence on logic programs with answer set semantics gives rise to a consequence relation on logic program rules, called SE-consequence. We present a sound and complete set of inference rules for SE-consequence on disjunctive logic programs.