I begin by considering examples of practical reasoning. In the remainder of the paper, I try to say something about what Example 8. Playing soccer. Soccer is like table tennis, but a logical approach that begins to do justice to the subject with the added dimension of teamwork and the need to might be like. This task was selected as a benchmark problem in robotics, and has been extensively Example 1. Ordering a meal at a restaurant. Here, the problem is deciding what to eat and drink. Typing an email message, Even if the only relevant factors are price and preferences composing it as you go along, starts perhaps with a general about food, the number of possible combinations is very idea of what to say.

It has been argued that causal rules are necessary for representing both implicit side-effects of actions and action qualifications, and there have been a number different approaches for representing causal rules in the area of formal theories of actions. These different approaches in general agree on rules without cycles. However, they differ on causal rules with mutual cyclic dependencies, both in terms of how these rules are supposed to be represented and their semantics. In this paper we show that by adding one more minimization to Lin's circumscriptive causal theory in the situation calculus, we can have a uniform representation of causal rules including those with cyclic dependencies. We also demonstrate that sometimes causal rules can be compiled into logically equivalent (under a proposed semantics) successor state axioms even in the presence of cyclical dependencies between fluents.

This paper presents the formalization of a biological process, cell division, in modular action language ALM. We show how the features of ALM — modularity, separation between an uninterpreted theory and its interpretation — lead to a simple and elegant solution that can be used in answering questions from biology textbooks.

We present an ontology consisting of a theory of spatial dimension and a theory of dimension-independent mereological and topological relations in space. Though both are fairly weak axiomatizations, their interplay suffices to define various mereotopological relations and to make any necessary dimension constraints explicit. We show that models of the INCH Calculus and the Region-Connection Calculus (RCC) can be obtained from extensions of the proposed ontology.

In this work, we present a causal extension of logic programming under the stable models semantics where, for a given stable model, we capture the alternative causes of each true atom. The syntax is extended by the simple addition of an optional reference label per each rule in the program. Then, the obtained causes rely on the concept of a causal proof: an inverted tree of labels that keeps track of the ordered application of rules that has allowed deriving a given true atom.

Most machine learning tools work with a single table where each row is an instance and each column is an attribute. Each cell of the table contains an attribute value for an instance. This representation prevents one important form of learning, which is, classification based on groups of correlated records, such as multiple exams of a single patient, internet customer preferences, weather forecast or prediction of sea conditions for a given day. To some extent, relational learning methods, such as inductive logic programming, can capture this correlation through the use of intensional predicates added to the background knowledge. In this work, we propose SPPAM, an algorithm that aggregates past observations in one single record. We show that applying SPPAM to the original correlated data, before the learning task, can produce classifiers that are better than the ones trained using all records.

Rules in logic programming encode information about mutual interdependencies between literals that is not captured by any of the commonly used semantics. This information becomes essential as soon as a program needs to be modified or further manipulated. We argue that, in these cases, a program should not be viewed solely as the set of its models. Instead, it should be viewed and manipulated as the set of sets of models of each rule inside it. With this in mind, we investigate and highlight relations between the SE-model semantics and individual rules. We identify a set of representatives of rule equivalence classes induced by SE-models, and so pinpoint the exact expressivity of this semantics with respect to a single rule. We also characterise the class of sets of SE-interpretations representable by a single rule. Finally, we discuss the introduction of two notions of equivalence, both stronger than strong equivalence [1] and weaker than strong update equivalence [2], which seem more suitable whenever the dependency information found in rules is of interest.

We examine the class of languages that can be defined entirely in terms of provability in an extension of the sorted type theory (Ty_n) by embedding the logic of phonologies, without introduction of special types for syntactic entities. This class is proven to precisely coincide with the class of logically closed languages that may be thought of as functions from expressions to sets of logically equivalent Ty_n terms. For a specific sub-class of logically closed languages that are described by finite sets of rules or rule schemata, we find effective procedures for building a compact Ty_n representation, involving a finite number of axioms or axiom schemata. The proposed formalism is characterized by some useful features unavailable in a two-component architecture of a language model. A further specialization and extension of the formalism with a context type enable effective account of intensional and dynamic semantics.

We offer a new understanding of some aspects of practical SAT-solvers that are based on DPLL with unit-clause propagation, clause-learning, and restarts. We do so by analyzing a concrete algorithm which we claim is faithful to what practical solvers do. In particular, before making any new decision or restart, the solver repeatedly applies the unit-resolution rule until saturation, and leaves no component to the mercy of non-determinism except for some internal randomness. We prove the perhaps surprising fact that, although the solver is not explicitly designed for it, with high probability it ends up behaving as width-k resolution after no more than O(n^{2k+2}) conflicts and restarts, where n is the number of variables. In other words, width-k resolution can be thought of as O(n^{2k+2}) restarts of the unit-resolution rule with learning.

We present a method for using standard techniques from satisfiability checking to automatically verify and discover theorems in an area of economic theory known as ranking sets of objects. The key question in this area, which has important applications in social choice theory and decision making under uncertainty, is how to extend an agent's preferences over a number of objects to a preference relation over nonempty sets of such objects. Certain combinations of seemingly natural principles for this kind of preference extension can result in logical inconsistencies, which has led to a number of important impossibility theorems. We first prove a general result that shows that for a wide range of such principles, characterised by their syntactic form when expressed in a many-sorted first-order logic, any impossibility exhibited at a fixed (small) domain size will necessarily extend to the general case. We then show how to formulate candidates for impossibility theorems at a fixed domain size in propositional logic, which in turn enables us to automatically search for (general) impossibility theorems using a SAT solver. When applied to a space of 20 principles for preference extension familiar from the literature, this method yields a total of 84 impossibility theorems, including both known and nontrivial new results.