Many representation schemes combining first-order logic and probability have been proposed in recent years. Progress in unifying logical and probabilistic inference has been slower. Existing methods are mainly variants of lifted variable elimination and belief propagation, neither of which take logical structure into account. We propose the first method that has the full power of both graphical model inference and first-order theorem proving (in finite domains with Herbrand interpretations). We first define probabilistic theorem proving, their generalization, as the problem of computing the probability of a logical formula given the probabilities or weights of a set of formulas. We then show how this can be reduced to the problem of lifted weighted model counting, and develop an efficient algorithm for the latter. We prove the correctness of this algorithm, investigate its properties, and show how it generalizes previous approaches. Experiments show that it greatly outperforms lifted variable elimination when logical structure is present. Finally, we propose an algorithm for approximate probabilistic theorem proving, and show that it can greatly outperform lifted belief propagation.

Probabilistic logic programs are logic programs in which some of the facts are annotated with probabilities. Several classical probabilistic inference tasks (such as MAP and computing marginals) have not yet received a lot of attention for this formalism. The contribution of this paper is that we develop efficient inference algorithms for these tasks. This is based on a conversion of the probabilistic logic program and the query and evidence to a weighted CNF formula. This allows us to reduce the inference tasks to well-studied tasks such as weighted model counting. To solve such tasks, we employ state-of-the-art methods. We consider multiple methods for the conversion of the programs as well as for inference on the weighted CNF. The resulting approach is evaluated experimentally and shown to improve upon the state-of-the-art in probabilistic logic programming.

Complex mission or task specification languages play a fundamentally important role in human/robotic interaction. In realistic scenarios such as emergency response, specifying temporal, resource and other constraints on a mission is an essential component due to the dynamic and contingent nature of the operational environments. It is also desirable that in addition to having a formal semantics, the language should be sufficiently expressive, pragmatic and abstract. The main goal of this paper is to propose a mission specification language that meets these requirements. It is based on extending both the syntax and semantics of a well-established formalism for reasoning about action and change, Temporal Action Logic (TAL), in order to represent temporal composite actions with constraints. Fixpoints are required to specify loops and recursion in the extended language. The results include a sound and complete proof theory for this extension. To ensure that the composite language constructs are adequately grounded in the pragmatic operation of robotic systems, Task Specification Trees (TSTs) and their mapping to these constructs are proposed. The expressive and pragmatic adequacy of this approach is demonstrated using an emergency response scenario.

The paper introduces a worst-case optimal tableau algorithm for reasoning with Forest Logic Programs, a decidable fragment of Open Answer Set Programming. FoLPs are a useful device for tight integration of the Description Logic and the Logic Programming worlds: reasoning with the DL SHOQ can be simulated within the fragment. The algorithm reuses a knowledge compilation technique previously introduced, but improves on previous results by decreasing the worst-case running time with one exponential level. The decrease in complexity is due to the usage in conjunction of a new redundancy and of a new caching rule.

We define a notion of bounded action theory in the situation calculus, where the theory entails that in all situations, the number of ground fluent atoms is bounded by a constant. Such theories can still have an infinite domain and an infinite set of states. We argue that such theories are fairly common in applications, either because facts do not persist indefinitely or because one eventually forgets some facts, as one learns new ones. We discuss various ways of obtaining bounded action theories. The main result of the paper is that verification of an expressive class of first-order mu-calculus temporal properties in such theories is in fact decidable.

In this paper, we propose a semantic forgetting for arbitrary logic programs(or propositional theories) under answer set semantics,called HT-forgetting. The HT-forgetting preserves strong equivalence in the sense that strongly equivalent logic programs will remain strongly equivalent after forgetting the same set of atoms. The result of an HT-forgetting is always expressible by a logic program, and in particular, the result of an HT-forgetting in a Horn program is expressible in a Horn program; and a representation theorem shows that HT-forgetting can be precisely characterized by Zhang-Zhou's four forgetting postulates under the logic of here-and-there. We also reveal underlying connections between HT-forgetting and classical forgetting, and provide complexity results for decision problems.

Temporal logics can be used in reasoning about actions for specifying constraints on domain descriptions and temporal properties to be verified. In this paper, we exploit Bounded Model Checking (BMC) techniques in the verification of Dynamic Linear Time Temporal Logic (DLTL) properties of an action theory, which is formulated in a temporal extension of Answer Set Programming (ASP). To achieve completeness, we propose an approach to BMC which exploits the Buechi automaton construction while searching for a counterexample. We provide an encoding in ASP of the temporal action domain and of Bounded Model Checking of DLTL formulas.

The advance of Internet and Sensor technology has brought about new challenges evoked by the emergence of continuous data streams. While existing data-stream management systems allow for high-throughput stream processing, they lack complex reasoning capacities. We address this shortcoming and elaborate upon an approach to knowledge-intense stream reasoning based on Answer Set Programming (ASP). The emphasis thus shifts from rapid data processing to complex reasoning. To accommodate this in ASP, we develop new techniques that allow us to formulate problem encodings dealing with emerging as well as expiring data in a seamless way. We thus propose novel language constructs and modeling techniques for specifying and reasoning with time-decaying logic programs.

We present a system capable of automatically solving combinatorial logic puzzles given in (simplified) English. It uses an ontology to represent the puzzles in ASP which is applicable to a large set of logic puzzles. To translate the English descriptions of the puzzles into this ontology, we use a lambda-calculus based approach using Probabilistic Combinatorial Categorial Grammars (PCCG) where the meanings of words are associated with parameters to be able to distinguish between multiple meanings of the same word.

Unification in Description Logics (DLs) has been proposed as an inference service that can, for example, be used to detect redundancies in ontologies. The inexpressive Description Logic EL is of particular interest in this context since, on the one hand, several large biomedical ontologies are defined using EL. On the other hand, unification in EL has recently been shown to be NP-complete, and thus of significantly lower complexity than unification in other DLs of similarly restricted expressive power. However, the unification algorithms for EL developed so far cannot deal with general concept inclusion axioms (GCIs). This paper makes a considerable step towards addressing this problem, but the GCIs our new unification algorithm can deal with still need to satisfy a certain cycle restriction.