Tactics analyze the current proof state (goal and assumptions) and apply non-trivial proof transformations. Formalized proofs take advantage of different levels of automation which are in increasing order of generality: specialized rules, theory-based strategies and general purpose strategies. Thanks to progress in proof automation, developers can delegate more and more complicated proof obligations to general purpose strategies. Those are implemented by automated theorem provers (ATPs) such as E prover [32]. Communication between an ITP and ATPs is made possible by a "hammer" system [4,14]. It acts as an interface by performing premise selection, translation and proof reconstruction. Yet, ATPs are not flawless and more precise user-guidance, achieved by applying a particular sequence of specialized rules, is almost always necessary to develop a mathematical theory.

We take up an idea from the folklore of Answer Set Programming, namely that choices, integrity constraints along with a restricted rule format is sufficient for Answer Set Programming. We elaborate upon the foundations of this idea in the context of the logic of Here-and-There and show how it can be derived from the logical principle of extension by definition. We then provide an austere form of logic programs that may serve as a normalform for logic programs similar to conjunctive normalform in classical logic. Finally, we take the key ideas and propose a modeling methodology for ASP beginners and illustrate how it can be used.

A prominent problem in knowledge representation is how to answer queries taking into account also the implicit consequences of an ontology representing domain knowledge. While this problem has been widely studied within the realm of description logic ontologies, it has been surprisingly neglected within the context of vague or imprecise knowledge, particularly from the point of view of mathematical fuzzy logic. In this paper we study the problem of answering conjunctive queries and threshold queries w.r.t. ontologies in fuzzy DL-Lite. Specifically, we show through a rewriting approach that threshold query answering w.r.t. consistent ontologies remains in $AC_0$ in data complexity, but that conjunctive query answering is highly dependent on the selected triangular norm, which has an impact on the underlying semantics. For the idempodent G\"odel t-norm, we provide an effective method based on a reduction to the classical case. This paper is under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).

PDDL+ is an extension of PDDL2.1 which incorporates fully-featured autonomous processes and allows for better modelling of mixed discrete-continuous domains. Unlike PDDL2.1, PDDL+ lacks a logical semantics, relying instead on state-transitional semantics enriched with hybrid automata semantics for the continuous states. This complex semantics makes analysis and comparisons to other action formalisms difficult. In this paper, we propose a natural extension of Reiter's situation calculus theories inspired by hybrid automata. The kinship between PDDL+ and hybrid automata allows us to develop a direct mapping between PDDL+ and situation calculus, thereby supplying PDDL+ with a logical semantics and the situation calculus with a modern way of representing autonomous processes. We outline the potential benefits of the mapping by suggesting a new approach to effective planning in PDDL+.

Multi-core and highly-connected architectures have become ubiquitous, and this has brought renewed interest in language-based approaches to the exploitation of parallelism. Since its inception, logic programming has been recognized as a programming paradigm with great potential for automated exploitation of parallelism. The comprehensive survey of the first twenty years of research in parallel logic programming, published in 2001, has served since as a fundamental reference to researchers and developers. The contents are quite valid today, but at the same time the field has continued evolving at a fast pace in the years that have followed. Many of these achievements and ongoing research have been driven by the rapid pace of technological innovation, that has led to advances such as very large clusters, the wide diffusion of multi-core processors, the game-changing role of general-purpose graphic processing units, and the ubiquitous adoption of cloud computing. This has been paralleled by significant advances within logic programming, such as tabling, more powerful static analysis and verification, the rapid growth of Answer Set Programming, and in general, more mature implementations and systems. This survey provides a review of the research in parallel logic programming covering the period since 2001, thus providing a natural continuation of the previous survey. The goal of the survey is to serve not only as a reference for researchers and developers of logic programming systems, but also as engaging reading for anyone interested in logic and as a useful source for researchers in parallel systems outside logic programming. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).

We solve university level probability and statistics questions by program synthesis using OpenAI's Codex, a Transformer trained on text and fine-tuned on code. We transform course problems from MIT's 18.05 Introduction to Probability and Statistics and Harvard's STAT110 Probability into programming tasks. We then execute the generated code to get a solution. Since these course questions are grounded in probability, we often aim to have Codex generate probabilistic programs that simulate a large number of probabilistic dependencies to compute its solution. Our approach requires prompt engineering to transform the question from its original form to an explicit, tractable form that results in a correct program and solution. To estimate the amount of work needed to translate an original question into its tractable form, we measure the similarity between original and transformed questions. Our work is the first to introduce a new dataset of university-level probability and statistics problems and solve these problems in a scalable fashion using the program synthesis capabilities of large language models.

Possibilistic logic is the most popular approach to represent and reason with uncertain and partially inconsistent knowledge. Regarding normal forms, the encoding of real-world problems does usually not result in a clausal formula and although a possibility nonclausal formula is theoretically equivalent to some possibilistic clausal formula [26, 22], approaches needing clausal form transformations are practically infeasible or have experimentally shown to be highly inefficient as discussed below. Two kinds of clausal form transformation are known: (1) one is based on the repetitive application of the distributive laws to the input non-clausal formula until a logically equivalent clausal formula is obtained; and (2) the other transformation, Tsetin-transformation [59], is based on recursively substituting sub-formulas in the input non-clausal formula by fresh literals until obtaining an equi-satisfiable, but not equivalent, clausal formula.

This course is being covered by a Semiconductor Industry Professional with about 4 years of industrial experience with Masters Degree in Embedded Systems and will have elements of practical application throughout the course for better understanding. Digital Electronics course is essential for many graduate courses and forms the basis for many other courses. It's important to get these basics right to build strong foundation. You can quickly go through introductory lectures which are available for preview and signup for the rest of the course! Check out the initial few lectures for dis counts on the course!

Boolean matching is significant to digital integrated circuits design. An exhaustive method for Boolean matching is computationally expensive even for functions with only a few variables, because the time complexity of such an algorithm for an n-variable Boolean function is $O(2^{n+1}n!)$. Sensitivity is an important characteristic and a measure of the complexity of Boolean functions. It has been used in analysis of the complexity of algorithms in different fields. This measure could be regarded as a signature of Boolean functions and has great potential to help reduce the search space of Boolean matching. In this paper, we introduce Boolean sensitivity into Boolean matching and design several sensitivity-related signatures to enhance fast Boolean matching. First, we propose some new signatures that relate sensitivity to Boolean equivalence. Then, we prove that these signatures are prerequisites for Boolean matching, which we can use to reduce the search space of the matching problem. Besides, we develop a fast sensitivity calculation method to compute and compare these signatures of two Boolean functions. Compared with the traditional cofactor and symmetric detection methods, sensitivity is a series of signatures of another dimension. We also show that sensitivity can be easily integrated into traditional methods and distinguish the mismatched Boolean functions faster. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that introduces sensitivity to Boolean matching. The experimental results show that sensitivity-related signatures we proposed in this paper can reduce the search space to a very large extent, and perform up to 3x speedup over the state-of-the-art Boolean matching methods.

This paper presents a comprehensive framework for run-time self-checking of logical agents, by means of temporal axioms to be dynamically checked. These axioms are specified by using an agent-oriented interval temporal logic defined to this purpose. We define syntax, semantics and pragmatics for this new logic, specifically tailored for application to agents. In the resulting framework, we encompass and extend our past work.