Answer-set programming (ASP), a family of SAT-based logic programming systems, is attractive for procedural content generation.

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a powerful programming paradigm that allows for an easy encoding of decision problems in NP. If the answer to a problem in NP is "yes," then, by definition, there is a "yes"-certificate that can be checked in polynomial time. In an ASP guess-and-check program, a programmer first declares the format of such a certificate, and then specifies the constraints that a well-formatted certificate should obey in order to be a "yes"- certificate. For example, for the well-known problem SAT, an ASP-programmer can first declare that certificates take the form of truth assignments, and then specify that "yes"-certificates are those certificates that leave no clause unsatisfied. While ASP guess-and-check programs are typically oriented towards NP-complete problems, they can also be used for problems in P. For example, the previously mentioned encoding of SAT also solves 2SAT, which is known to be in P. This raises the following issue which will be addressed in this paper. Assume that we have an answer set solver at our disposal, and that we have written a guess-and-check ASP program for a particular problem that is NPcomplete in general (for example, SAT). Assume furthermore that we know that under some restrictions, the problem can be solved in polynomial time (for example, the restriction of SAT to 2SAT).

We introduce Boolean Observation Games, a subclass of multi-player finite strategic games with incomplete information and qualitative objectives. In Boolean observation games, each player is associated with a finite set of propositional variables of which only it can observe the value, and it controls whether and to whom it can reveal that value. It does not control the given, fixed, value of variables. Boolean observation games are a generalization of Boolean games, a well-studied subclass of strategic games but with complete information, and wherein each player controls the value of its variables. In Boolean observation games player goals describe multi-agent knowledge of variables. As in classical strategic games, players choose their strategies simultaneously and therefore observation games capture aspects of both imperfect and incomplete information. They require reasoning about sets of outcomes given sets of indistinguishable valuations of variables. What a Nash equilibrium is, depends on an outcome relation between such sets. We present various outcome relations, including a qualitative variant of ex-post equilibrium. We identify conditions under which, given an outcome relation, Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist. We also study the complexity of checking for the existence of Nash equilibria and of verifying if a strategy profile is a Nash equilibrium. We further study the subclass of Boolean observation games with `knowing whether' goal formulas, for which the satisfaction does not depend on the value of variables. We show that each such Boolean observation game corresponds to a Boolean game and vice versa, by a different correspondence, and that both correspondences are precise in terms of existence of Nash equilibria.

Tractable Boolean and arithmetic circuits have been studied extensively in AI for over two decades now. These circuits were initially proposed as "compiled objects," meant to facilitate logical and probabilistic reasoning, as they permit various types of inference to be performed in linear-time and a feed-forward fashion like neural networks. In more recent years, the role of tractable circuits has significantly expanded as they became a computational and semantical backbone for some approaches that aim to integrate knowledge, reasoning and learning. In this article, we review the foundations of tractable circuits and some associated milestones, while focusing on their core properties and techniques that make them particularly useful for the broad aims of neuro-symbolic AI.

We present and analyze the employment of the Diproche system, a natural language proof checker, within a one-semester mathematics beginners lecture with 228 participants. The system is used to check the students' solution attempts to proving exercises in Boolean set theory and elementary number theory and to give them immediate feedback. The benefits of the employment of the system are assessed via a questionnaire at the end of the semester and via analyzing the solution attempts of a subgroup of the students. Based on our results we develop approaches for future improvements.

The introduction of automated deduction systems in secondary schools face several bottlenecks, the absence of the subject of rigorous mathematical demonstrations in the curricula, the lack of knowledge by the teachers about the subject and the difficulty of tackling the task by automatic means. Despite those difficulties we claim that the subject of automated deduction in geometry can be introduced, by addressing it in particular cases: simple to manipulate by students and teachers and reasonably easy to be dealt by automatic deduction tools. The subject is discussed by addressing four secondary schools geometry problems: their rigorous proofs, visual proofs, numeric proofs, algebraic formal proofs, synthetic formal proofs, or the lack of them. For these problems we discuss a lesson plan to address them with the help of Information and Communications Technology, more specifically, automated deduction tools.

Letter-string analogy is an important analogy learning task which seems to be easy for humans but very challenging for machines. The main idea behind current approaches to solving letter-string analogies is to design heuristic rules for extracting analogy structures and constructing analogy mappings. However, one key problem is that it is difficult to build a comprehensive and exhaustive set of analogy structures which can fully describe the subtlety of analogies. This problem makes current approaches unable to handle complicated letter-string analogy problems. In this paper, we propose Neural logic analogy learning (Noan), which is a dynamic neural architecture driven by differentiable logic reasoning to solve analogy problems. Each analogy problem is converted into logical expressions consisting of logical variables and basic logical operations (AND, OR, and NOT). More specifically, Noan learns the logical variables as vector embeddings and learns each logical operation as a neural module. In this way, the model builds computational graph integrating neural network with logical reasoning to capture the internal logical structure of the input letter strings. The analogy learning problem then becomes a True/False evaluation problem of the logical expressions. Experiments show that our machine learning-based Noan approach outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on standard letter-string analogy benchmark datasets.

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a popular approach for robotic path planning in uncertain environments. However, the control policies trained for an RL agent crucially depend on user-defined, state-based reward functions. Poorly designed rewards can lead to policies that do get maximal rewards but fail to satisfy desired task objectives or are unsafe. There are several examples of the use of formal languages such as temporal logics and automata to specify high-level task specifications for robots (in lieu of Markovian rewards). Recent efforts have focused on inferring state-based rewards from formal specifications; here, the goal is to provide (probabilistic) guarantees that the policy learned using RL (with the inferred rewards) satisfies the high-level formal specification. A key drawback of several of these techniques is that the rewards that they infer are sparse: the agent receives positive rewards only upon completion of the task and no rewards otherwise. This naturally leads to poor convergence properties and high variance during RL. In this work, we propose using formal specifications in the form of symbolic automata: these serve as a generalization of both bounded-time temporal logic-based specifications as well as automata. Furthermore, our use of symbolic automata allows us to define non-sparse potential-based rewards which empirically shape the reward surface, leading to better convergence during RL. We also show that our potential-based rewarding strategy still allows us to obtain the policy that maximizes the satisfaction of the given specification.

Learning arguments is highly relevant to the field of explainable artificial intelligence. It is a family of symbolic machine learning techniques that is particularly human-interpretable. These techniques learn a set of arguments as an intermediate representation. Arguments are small rules with exceptions that can be chained to larger arguments for making predictions or decisions. We investigate the learning of arguments, specifically the learning of arguments from a 'case model' proposed by Verheij [34]. The case model in Verheij's approach are cases or scenarios in a legal setting. The number of cases in a case model are relatively low. Here, we investigate whether Verheij's approach can be used for learning arguments from other types of data sets with a much larger number of instances. We compare the learning of arguments from a case model with the HeRO algorithm [15] and learning a decision tree.

Statistical relational AI and probabilistic logic programming have so far mostly focused on discrete probabilistic models. The reasons for this is that one needs to provide constructs to succinctly model the independencies in such models, and also provide efficient inference. Three types of independencies are important to represent and exploit for scalable inference in hybrid models: conditional independencies elegantly modeled in Bayesian networks, context-specific independencies naturally represented by logical rules, and independencies amongst attributes of related objects in relational models succinctly expressed by combining rules. This paper introduces a hybrid probabilistic logic programming language, DC#, which integrates distributional clauses' syntax and semantics principles of Bayesian logic programs. It represents the three types of independencies qualitatively. More importantly, we also introduce the scalable inference algorithm FO-CS-LW for DC#. FO-CS-LW is a first-order extension of the context-specific likelihood weighting algorithm (CS-LW), a novel sampling method that exploits conditional independencies and context-specific independencies in ground models.