Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a powerful declarative programming paradigm commonly used for solving challenging search and optimization problems. The modeling languages of ASP are supported by sophisticated solving algorithms (solvers) that make the solution search efficient while enabling the programmer to model the problem at a high level of abstraction. As an approach to Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, ASP benefits from its simplicity, conciseness and rigorously defined semantics. These characteristics make ASP a straightforward way to develop formally verifiable programs. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI), the clarity of ASP programs lends itself to the construction of explainable, trustworthy AI. In support of these goals, my research is concerned with extending the theory and tools supporting the verification of ASP progams.

The logic of hybrid MKNF (minimal knowledge and negation as failure) is a powerful knowledge representation language that elegantly pairs ASP (answer set programming) with ontologies. Disjunctive rules are a desirable extension to normal rule-based reasoning and typically semantic frameworks designed for normal knowledge bases need substantial restructuring to support disjunctive rules. Alternatively, one may lift characterizations of normal rules to support disjunctive rules by inducing a collection of normal knowledge bases, each with the same body and a single atom in its head. In this work, we refer to a set of such normal knowledge bases as a head-cut of a disjunctive knowledge base. The question arises as to whether the semantics of disjunctive hybrid MKNF knowledge bases can be characterized using fixpoint constructions with head-cuts. Earlier, we have shown that head-cuts can be paired with fixpoint operators to capture the two-valued MKNF models of disjunctive hybrid MKNF knowledge bases. Three-valued semantics extends two-valued semantics with the ability to express partial information. In this work, we present a fixpoint construction that leverages head-cuts using an operator that iteratively captures three-valued models of hybrid MKNF knowledge bases with disjunctive rules. This characterization also captures partial stable models of disjunctive logic programs since a program can be expressed as a disjunctive hybrid MKNF knowledge base with an empty ontology. We elaborate on a relationship between this characterization and approximators in AFT (approximation fixpoint theory) for normal hybrid MKNF knowledge bases.

Justification theory [3] is a unifying theory to capture semantics of non-monotonic logics. Largely thanks to its abstract nature, it is a powerful framework with many use cases. First, it provides a mechanism to define new logics based on well-known principles in a uniform way, as well as to transfer results between domains. Second, it brings order in the zoo of logics and semantics, by enabling a systematic comparison between multiple semantics for a single logic and between different logics, for instance by answering the question whether a certain semantics of a given logic coincides with a semantics of another logic.

Kleene algebra with tests (KAT) is a foundational equational framework for reasoning about programs, which has found applications in program transformations, networking and compiler optimizations, among many other areas. In his seminal work, Kozen proved that KAT subsumes propositional Hoare logic, showing that one can reason about the (partial) correctness of while programs by means of the equational theory of KAT. In this work, we investigate the support that KAT provides for reasoning about incorrectness, instead, as embodied by Ohearn's recently proposed incorrectness logic. We show that KAT cannot directly express incorrectness logic. The main reason for this limitation can be traced to the fact that KAT cannot express explicitly the notion of codomain, which is essential to express incorrectness triples. To address this issue, we study Kleene Algebra with Top and Tests (TopKAT), an extension of KAT with a top element. We show that TopKAT is powerful enough to express a codomain operation, to express incorrectness triples, and to prove all the rules of incorrectness logic sound. This shows that one can reason about the incorrectness of while-like programs by means of the equational theory of TopKAT.

ICLP is the premier international event for presenting research in logic programming. Contributions to ICLP 2022 were sought in all areas of logic programming, including but not limited to: Foundations: Semantics, Formalisms, Nonmonotonic reasoning, Knowledge representation. Languages issues: Concurrency, Objects, Coordination, Mobility, Higher order, Types, Modes, Assertions, Modules, Meta-programming, Logic-based domain-specific languages, Programming techniques. Programming support: Program analysis, Transformation, Validation, Verification, Debugging, Profiling, Testing, Execution visualization. Implementation: Compilation, Virtual machines, Memory management, Parallel and Distributed execution, Constraint handling rules, Tabling, Foreign interfaces, User interfaces. Related Paradigms and Synergies: Inductive and coinductive logic programming, Constraint logic programming, Answer set programming, Interaction with SAT, SMT and CSP solvers, Theorem proving, Argumentation, Probabilistic programming, Machine learning. Applications: Databases, Big data, Data integration and federation, Software engineering, Natural language processing, Web and semantic web, Agents, Artificial intelligence, Computational life sciences, Cyber-security, Robotics, Education.

Probabilistic model checking is a useful technique for specifying and verifying properties of stochastic systems including randomized protocols and reinforcement learning models. Existing methods rely on the assumed structure and probabilities of certain system transitions. These assumptions may be incorrect, and may even be violated by an adversary who gains control of system components. In this paper, we develop a formal framework for adversarial robustness in systems modeled as discrete time Markov chains (DTMCs). We base our framework on existing methods for verifying probabilistic temporal logic properties and extend it to include deterministic, memoryless policies acting in Markov decision processes (MDPs). Our framework includes a flexible approach for specifying structure-preserving and non structure-preserving adversarial models. We outline a class of threat models under which adversaries can perturb system transitions, constrained by an $\varepsilon$ ball around the original transition probabilities. We define three main DTMC adversarial robustness problems: adversarial robustness verification, maximal $\delta$ synthesis, and worst case attack synthesis. We present two optimization-based solutions to these three problems, leveraging traditional and parametric probabilistic model checking techniques. We then evaluate our solutions on two stochastic protocols and a collection of Grid World case studies, which model an agent acting in an environment described as an MDP. We find that the parametric solution results in fast computation for small parameter spaces. In the case of less restrictive (stronger) adversaries, the number of parameters increases, and directly computing property satisfaction probabilities is more scalable. We demonstrate the usefulness of our definitions and solutions by comparing system outcomes over various properties, threat models, and case studies.

Combining deep learning with symbolic logic reasoning aims to capitalize on the success of both fields and is drawing increasing attention. Inspired by DeepLogic, an end-to-end model trained to perform inference on logic programs, we introduce IMA-GloVe-GA, an iterative neural inference network for multi-step reasoning expressed in natural language. In our model, reasoning is performed using an iterative memory neural network based on RNN with a gate attention mechanism. We evaluate IMA-GloVe-GA on three datasets: PARARULES, CONCEPTRULES V1 and CONCEPTRULES V2. Experimental results show DeepLogic with gate attention can achieve higher test accuracy than DeepLogic and other RNN baseline models. Our model achieves better out-of-distribution generalisation than RoBERTa-Large when the rules have been shuffled. Furthermore, to address the issue of unbalanced distribution of reasoning depths in the current multi-step reasoning datasets, we develop PARARULE-Plus, a large dataset with more examples that require deeper reasoning steps. Experimental results show that the addition of PARARULE-Plus can increase the model's performance on examples requiring deeper reasoning depths. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/Strong-AI-Lab/Multi-Step-Deductive-Reasoning-Over-Natural-Language.

Prompted models have demonstrated impressive In this position paper, we argue that a useful unifying few-shot learning abilities. Repeated interactions framework for understanding and extending this disparate at test-time with a single model, or the body of work is in terms of probabilistic programming languages composition of multiple models together, further (PPL) extended to work with strings, instead of expands capabilities. These compositions are more atomic data types like integers and floats. That is, probabilistic models, and may be expressed in we use a PPL to define a joint probability model on stringvalued the language of graphical models with random random variables, parameterized using LMs, and variables whose values are complex data types then condition this model on string-valued observations in such as strings. Cases with control flow and dynamic order to compute a posterior over string-valued unknowns, structure require techniques from probabilistic which we can then infer. We call such a probabilistic programming, which allow implementing program a language model cascade. We show that this disparate model structures and inference strategies framework captures many recent approaches, and also allows in a unified language. We formalize several us to tackle more complex multi-step reasoning problems.

Model Checking is widely applied in verifying the correctness of complex and concurrent systems against a specification. Pure symbolic approaches while popular, still suffer from the state space explosion problem that makes them impractical for large scale systems and/or specifications. In this paper, we propose to use graph representation learning (GRL) for solving linear temporal logic (LTL) model checking, where the system and the specification are expressed by a B\"uchi automaton and an LTL formula respectively. A novel GRL-based framework OCTAL, is designed to learn the representation of the graph-structured system and specification, which reduces the model checking problem to binary classification in the latent space. The empirical experiments show that OCTAL achieves comparable accuracy against canonical SOTA model checkers on three different datasets, with up to $5\times$ overall speedup and above $63\times$ for satisfiability checking alone.

ACM fellow Dana Stewart Scott, the recipient jointly with Michael Rabin of the 1976 A.M. Turing Award for the concept of nondeterministic finite automata, has made seminal contributions spanning computing science, mathematics, philosophy, automata theory, modal logic, model theory, set theory, and the theory of programming languages. After receiving a B.A. in mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1950, and a Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1958, he held faculty positions at the University of Chicago, UC Berkeley, and at Stanford, Princeton, Oxford, and Carnegie Mellon Universities. He retired as University Professor from CMU in 2003. The distinguished theoretical computer scientist Gordon Plotkin conducted a series of four oral history interviews of Scott between November 2020 and February 2021. The interviews, the transcripts and videos of which are online,a cover primarily the period leading up to the 1976 ACM A.M. Turing Award. Presented here is a condensed and highly edited version, which includes some additional post-interview material provided by Scott. I was born in 1932 in Berkeley, CA, where I am now in retirement. We lived on a farm near Susanville when I started first grade in a one-room school-house.