Premise selection is a fundamental problem of automated theorem proving. Previous works often use intricate symbolic methods, rely on domain knowledge, and require significant engineering effort to solve this task. In this work, we show that Magnushammer, a neural transformer-based approach, can outperform traditional symbolic systems by a large margin. Tested on the PISA benchmark, Magnushammer achieves $59.5\%$ proof rate compared to a $38.3\%$ proof rate of Sledgehammer, the most mature and popular symbolic-based solver. Furthermore, by combining Magnushammer with a neural formal prover based on a language model, we significantly improve the previous state-of-the-art proof rate from $57.0\%$ to $71.0\%$.

Learning logical rules is critical to improving reasoning in KGs. This is due to their ability to provide logical and interpretable explanations when used for predictions, as well as their ability to generalize to other tasks, domains, and data. While recent methods have been proposed to learn logical rules, the majority of these methods are either restricted by their computational complexity and cannot handle the large search space of large-scale KGs, or show poor generalization when exposed to data outside the training set. In this paper, we propose an endto-end neural model for learning compositional logical rules called NCRL. By recurrently merging compositions in the rule body with a recurrent attention unit, NCRL finally predicts a single rule head. Experimental results show that NCRL learns high-quality rules, as well as being generalizable. Specifically, we show that NCRL is scalable, efficient, and yields state-of-the-art results for knowledge graph completion on large-scale KGs. Moreover, we test NCRL for systematic generalization by learning to reason on small-scale observed graphs and evaluating on larger unseen ones. Knowledge Graphs (KGs) provide a structured representation of real-world facts (Ji et al., 2021), and they are remarkably useful in various applications (Graupmann et al., 2005; Lukovnikov et al., 2017; Xiong et al., 2017; Yih et al., 2015). Since KGs are usually incomplete, KG reasoning is a crucial problem in KGs, where the goal is to infer the missing knowledge using the observed facts. This paper investigates how to learn logical rules for KG reasoning.

Deploying robots in real-world domains, such as households and flexible manufacturing lines, requires the robots to be taskable on demand. Linear temporal logic (LTL) is a widely-used specification language with a compositional grammar that naturally induces commonalities across tasks. However, the majority of prior research on reinforcement learning with LTL specifications treats every new formula independently. We propose LTL-Transfer, a novel algorithm that enables subpolicy reuse across tasks by segmenting policies for training tasks into portable transition-centric skills capable of satisfying a wide array of unseen LTL specifications while respecting safety-critical constraints. Experiments in a Minecraft-inspired domain show that LTL-Transfer can satisfy over 90% of 500 unseen tasks after training on only 50 task specifications and never violating a safety constraint. We also deployed LTL-Transfer on a quadruped mobile manipulator in an analog household environment to demonstrate its ability to transfer to many fetch and delivery tasks in a zero-shot fashion.

The growing popularity of neuro symbolic reasoning has led to the adoption of various forms of differentiable (i.e., fuzzy) first order logic. We introduce PyReason, a software framework based on generalized annotated logic that both captures the current cohort of differentiable logics and temporal extensions to support inference over finite periods of time with capabilities for open world reasoning. Further, PyReason is implemented to directly support reasoning over graphical structures (e.g., knowledge graphs, social networks, biological networks, etc.), produces fully explainable traces of inference, and includes various practical features such as type checking and a memory-efficient implementation. This paper reviews various extensions of generalized annotated logic integrated into our implementation, our modern, efficient Python-based implementation that conducts exact yet scalable deductive inference, and a suite of experiments. PyReason is available at: github.com/lab-v2/pyreason.

Despite recent advances in modern machine learning algorithms, the opaqueness of their underlying mechanisms continues to be an obstacle in adoption. To instill confidence and trust in artificial intelligence systems, Explainable Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a response to improving modern machine learning algorithms' explainability. Inductive Logic Programming (ILP), a subfield of symbolic artificial intelligence, plays a promising role in generating interpretable explanations because of its intuitive logic-driven framework. ILP effectively leverages abductive reasoning to generate explainable first-order clausal theories from examples and background knowledge. However, several challenges in developing methods inspired by ILP need to be addressed for their successful application in practice. For example, existing ILP systems often have a vast solution space, and the induced solutions are very sensitive to noises and disturbances. This survey paper summarizes the recent advances in ILP and a discussion of statistical relational learning and neural-symbolic algorithms, which offer synergistic views to ILP. Following a critical review of the recent advances, we delineate observed challenges and highlight potential avenues of further ILP-motivated research toward developing self-explanatory artificial intelligence systems.

We describe the translation of the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) to Typed First-order Form (TFF) with level 0 polymorphism. Building on our prior work to create a TPTP FOF translation of SUMO for use in the E and Vampire theorem provers, we detail the transformations required to handle an explicitly typed logic, and express SUMO's type hierarchy for numbers in a manner consistent with its intended semantics and the three numerical classes allowed in TFF. We provide description of the open source code and an example proof in Vampire on the resulting theory.

Eva is a multimodal conversational system that helps users to accomplish their domain goals through collaborative dialogue. The system does this by inferring users' intentions and plans to achieve those goals, detects whether obstacles are present, finds plans to overcome them or to achieve higher-level goals, and plans its actions, including speech acts,to help users accomplish those goals. In doing so, the system maintains and reasons with its own beliefs, goals and intentions, and explicitly reasons about those of its user. Belief reasoning is accomplished with a modal Horn-clause meta-interpreter. The planning and reasoning subsystems obey the principles of persistent goals and intentions, including the formation and decomposition of intentions to perform complex actions, as well as the conditions under which they can be given up. In virtue of its planning process, the system treats its speech acts just like its other actions -- physical acts affect physical states, digital acts affect digital states, and speech acts affect mental and social states. This general approach enables Eva to plan a variety of speech acts including requests, informs, questions, confirmations, recommendations, offers, acceptances, greetings, and emotive expressions. Each of these has a formally specified semantics which is used during the planning and reasoning processes. Because it can keep track of different users' mental states, it can engage in multi-party dialogues. Importantly, Eva can explain its utterances because it has created a plan standing behind each of them. Finally, Eva employs multimodal input and output, driving an avatar that can perceive and employ facial and head movements along with emotive speech acts.

We consider the problem of explaining the temporal behavior of black-box systems using human-interpretable models. To this end, based on recent research trends, we rely on the fundamental yet interpretable models of deterministic finite automata (DFAs) and linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas. In contrast to most existing works for learning DFAs and LTL formulas, we rely on only positive examples. Our motivation is that negative examples are generally difficult to observe, in particular, from black-box systems. To learn meaningful models from positive examples only, we design algorithms that rely on conciseness and language minimality of models as regularizers. To this end, our algorithms adopt two approaches: a symbolic and a counterexample-guided one. While the symbolic approach exploits an efficient encoding of language minimality as a constraint satisfaction problem, the counterexample-guided one relies on generating suitable negative examples to prune the search. Both the approaches provide us with effective algorithms with theoretical guarantees on the learned models. To assess the effectiveness of our algorithms, we evaluate all of them on synthetic data.

We present a deep learning approach for repairing sequential circuits against formal specifications given in linear-time temporal logic (LTL). Given a defective circuit and its formal specification, we train Transformer models to output circuits that satisfy the corresponding specification. We propose a separated hierarchical Transformer for multimodal representation learning of the formal specification and the circuit. We introduce a data generation algorithm that enables generalization to more complex specifications and out-of-distribution datasets. In addition, our proposed repair mechanism significantly improves the automated synthesis of circuits from LTL specifications with Transformers. It improves the state-of-the-art by $6.8$ percentage points on held-out instances and $11.8$ percentage points on an out-of-distribution dataset from the annual reactive synthesis competition.

Interactive Theorem Provers (ITPs) are an indispensable tool in the arsenal of formal method experts as a platform for construction and (formal) verification of proofs. The complexity of the proofs in conjunction with the level of expertise typically required for the process to succeed can often hinder the adoption of ITPs. A recent strain of work has investigated methods to incorporate machine learning models trained on ITP user activity traces as a viable path towards full automation. While a valuable line of investigation, many problems still require human supervision to be completed fully, thus applying learning methods to assist the user with useful recommendations can prove more fruitful. Following the vein of user assistance, we introduce CoProver, a proof recommender system based on transformers, capable of learning from past actions during proof construction, all while exploring knowledge stored in the ITP concerning previous proofs. CoProver employs a neurally learnt sequence-based encoding of sequents, capturing long distance relationships between terms and hidden cues therein. We couple CoProver with the Prototype Verification System (PVS) and evaluate its performance on two key areas, namely: (1) Next Proof Action Recommendation, and (2) Relevant Lemma Retrieval given a library of theories. We evaluate CoProver on a series of well-established metrics originating from the recommender system and information retrieval communities, respectively. We show that CoProver successfully outperforms prior state of the art applied to recommendation in the domain. We conclude by discussing future directions viable for CoProver (and similar approaches) such as argument prediction, proof summarization, and more.