Detecting and exploiting similarities between seemingly distant objects is without doubt an important human ability. This paper develops \textit{from the ground up} an abstract algebraic and qualitative justification-based notion of similarity based on the observation that sets of generalizations encode important properties of elements. We show that similarity defined in this way has appealing mathematical properties. As we construct our notion of similarity from first principles using only elementary concepts of universal algebra, to convince the reader of its plausibility, we show that it can be naturally embedded into first-order logic via model-theoretic types.

Automated legal reasoning and its application in smart contracts and automated decisions are increasingly attracting interest. In this context, ethical and legal concerns make it necessary for automated reasoners to justify in human-understandable terms the advice given. Logic Programming, specially Answer Set Programming, has a rich semantics and has been used to very concisely express complex knowledge. However, modelling discretionality to act and other vague concepts such as ambiguity cannot be expressed in top-down execution models based on Prolog, and in bottom-up execution models based on ASP the justifications are incomplete and/or not scalable. We propose to use s(CASP), a top-down execution model for predicate ASP, to model vague concepts following a set of patterns. We have implemented a framework, called s(LAW), to model, reason, and justify the applicable legislation and validate it by translating (and benchmarking) a representative use case, the criteria for the admission of students in the "Comunidad de Madrid".

This paper serves as a comprehensive system description of version 2.0 of the Marabou framework for formal analysis of neural networks. We discuss the tool's architectural design and highlight the major features and components introduced since its initial release.

Reasoning, a crucial ability for complex problem-solving, plays a pivotal role in various real-world settings such as negotiation, medical diagnosis, and criminal investigation. It serves as a fundamental methodology in the field of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). With the ongoing development of foundation models, e.g., Large Language Models (LLMs), there is a growing interest in exploring their abilities in reasoning tasks. In this paper, we introduce seminal foundation models proposed or adaptable for reasoning, highlighting the latest advancements in various reasoning tasks, methods, and benchmarks. We then delve into the potential future directions behind the emergence of reasoning abilities within foundation models. We also discuss the relevance of multimodal learning, autonomous agents, and super alignment in the context of reasoning. By discussing these future research directions, we hope to inspire researchers in their exploration of this field, stimulate further advancements in reasoning with foundation models, and contribute to the development of AGI.

Symbolic Computation algorithms and their implementation in computer algebra systems often contain choices which do not affect the correctness of the output but can significantly impact the resources required: such choices can benefit from having them made separately for each problem via a machine learning model. This study reports lessons on such use of machine learning in symbolic computation, in particular on the importance of analysing datasets prior to machine learning and on the different machine learning paradigms that may be utilised. We present results for a particular case study, the selection of variable ordering for cylindrical algebraic decomposition, but expect that the lessons learned are applicable to other decisions in symbolic computation. We utilise an existing dataset of examples derived from applications which was found to be imbalanced with respect to the variable ordering decision. We introduce an augmentation technique for polynomial systems problems that allows us to balance and further augment the dataset, improving the machine learning results by 28\% and 38\% on average, respectively. We then demonstrate how the existing machine learning methodology used for the problem $-$ classification $-$ might be recast into the regression paradigm. While this does not have a radical change on the performance, it does widen the scope in which the methodology can be applied to make choices.

In traditional machine teaching, a teacher wants to teach a concept to a learner, by means of a finite set of examples, the witness set. But concepts can have many equivalent representations. This redundancy strongly affects the search space, to the extent that teacher and learner may not be able to easily determine the equivalence class of each representation. In this common situation, instead of teaching concepts, we explore the idea of teaching representations. We work with several teaching schemas that exploit representation and witness size (Eager, Greedy and Optimal) and analyze the gains in teaching effectiveness for some representational languages (DNF expressions and Turing-complete P3 programs). Our theoretical and experimental results indicate that there are various types of redundancy, handled better by the Greedy schema introduced here than by the Eager schema, although both can be arbitrarily far away from the Optimal. For P3 programs we found that witness sets are usually smaller than the programs they identify, which is an illuminating justification of why machine teaching from examples makes sense at all.

In this article, we solve some of the geometry problems of the N\'aboj 2023 competition with the help of a computer, using examples that the software tool GeoGebra Discovery can calculate. In each case, the calculation requires symbolic computations. We analyze the difficulty of feeding the problem into the machine and set further goals to make the problems of this type of contests even more tractable in the future.

Although there are several systems that successfully generate construction steps for ruler and compass construction problems, none of them provides readable synthetic correctness proofs for generated constructions. In the present work, we demonstrate how our triangle construction solver ArgoTriCS can cooperate with automated theorem provers for first order logic and coherent logic so that it generates construction correctness proofs, that are both human-readable and formal (can be checked by interactive theorem provers such as Coq or Isabelle/HOL). These proofs currently rely on many high-level lemmas and our goal is to have them all formally shown from the basic axioms of geometry.

Automated reasoning in geometry is available in various software tools for several years, mostly in prover packages. In this paper we pay our attention to a non-trivial presence of a geometry prover in the software tool GeoGebra Discovery [4, 5] that aims at reaching secondary schools with its intuitive user interface. Most importantly, we give a report on a STEM/STEAM project that was discussed in a group of prospective mathematics teachers at the Private University College of Education of the Diocese of Linz in Upper Austria during the winter semester 2022/23, in the frame of a course that focuses on exploiting technology in mathematics education (36 students in 2 working groups). This project consisted of several other experiments that were already communicated by the second author. The discussed activity, a detailed study of the movement of a rocking camel, is however, completely new. Also, some major improvements in the underlying software tool (implemented by the second author with a substantial help of the students' feedback), makes it much easier to model similar project setups and conclude mathematical knowledge in an automated way.

We address, through the automated reasoning tools in GeoGebra Discovery, a problem from a regional phase of the Austrian Mathematics Olympiad 2023. Trying to solve this problem gives rise to four different kind of feedback: the almost instantaneous, automated solution of the proposed problem; the measure of its complexity, according to some recent proposals; the automated discovery of a generalization of the given assertion, showing that the same statement is true over more general polygons than those mentioned in the problem; and the difficulties associated to the analysis of the surprising and involved high number of degenerate cases that appear when using the LocusEquation command in this problem. In our communication we will describe and reflect on these diverse issues, enhancing its exemplar role for showing some of the advantages, problems, and current fields of development of GeoGebra Discovery.