Recently, Helmert and Geffner proposed the context-enhanced additive heuristic, where fact costs are evaluated relative to context states that arise from achieving first a pivot condition of each operator. As Helmert and Geffner pointed out, the method can be generalized to consider contexts arising from arbitrary precedence constraints over operator conditions instead. Herein, we provide such a generalization. We extend Helmert and Geffner's equations, and discuss a number of design choices that arise. Drawing on previous work on goal orderings, we design a family of methods for automatically generating precedence constraints. We run large-scale experiments, showing that the technique can help significantly, depending on the choice of precedence constraints. We shed some light on this by profiling the behavior of all possible precedence constraints, using a sampling technique.

Symmetry is an important feature of many constraint programs. We show that any symmetry acting on a set of symmetry breaking constraints can be used to break symmetry. Different symmetries pick out different solutions in each symmetry class. We use these observations in two methods for eliminating symmetry from a problem. These methods are designed to have many of the advantages of symmetry breaking methods that post static symmetry breaking constraint without some of the disadvantages. In particular, the two methods prune the search space using fast and efficient propagation of posted constraints, whilst reducing the conflict between symmetry breaking and branching heuristics. Experimental results show that the two methods perform well on some standard benchmarks.

We study decompositions of NVALUE, a global constraint that can be used to model a wide range of problems where values need to be counted. Whilst decomposition typically hinders propagation, we identify one decomposition that maintains a global view as enforcing bound consistency on the decomposition achieves bound consistency on the original global NVALUE constraint. Such decompositions offer the prospect for advanced solving techniques like nogood learning and impact based branching heuristics. They may also help SAT and IP solvers take advantage of the propagation of global constraints.

Current research on qualitative spatial representation and reasoning mainly focuses on one single aspect of space. In real world applications, however, multiple spatial aspects are often involved simultaneously. This paper investigates problems arising in reasoning with combined topological and directional information. We use the RCC8 algebra and the Rectangle Algebra (RA) for expressing topological and directional information respectively. We give examples to show that the bipath-consistency algorithm BIPATH is incomplete for solving even basic RCC8 and RA constraints. If topological constraints are taken from some maximal tractable subclasses of RCC8, and directional constraints are taken from a subalgebra, termed DIR49, of RA, then we show that BIPATH is able to separate topological constraints from directional ones. This means, given a set of hybrid topological and directional constraints from the above subclasses of RCC8 and RA, we can transfer the joint satisfaction problem in polynomial time to two independent satisfaction problems in RCC8 and RA. For general RA constraints, we give a method to compute solutions that satisfy all topological constraints and approximately satisfy each RA constraint to any prescribed precision.

MINLP problems are hard constrained optimization problems, with nonlinear constraints and mixed discrete continuous variables. They can be solved using a Branch-and-Bound scheme combining several methods, such as linear programming, interval analysis, and cutting methods. Our goal is to integrate constraint programming techniques in this framework. Firstly, global constraints can be introduced to reformulate MINLP problems thus leading to clean models and more precise computations. Secondly, interval-based approximation techniques for nonlinear constraints can be improved by taking into account the integrality of variables early. These methods have been implemented in an interval solver and we present experimental results from a set of MINLP instances.

Arc consistency algorithms are widely used to prune the search space of Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). Since many researchers associate arc consistency with binary normalized CSPs, there is a confusion between the notion of arc consistency and 2-consistency. 2-consistency guarantees that any instantiation of a value to a variable can be consistently extended to any second variable. Thus, 2-consistency can be stronger than arc-consistency in binary CSPs. In this paper, we present a new algorithm, called 2-C3, which achieves 2-consistency in binary and non-normalized CSPs. This algorithm is a reformulation of the well-known AC3 algorithm. The evaluation section shows that 2-C3 is able to prune more search space than AC3 and AC4.

This article presents two new algorithms whose purpose is to maintain the Max-RPC domain filtering consistency during search with a minimal memory footprint and implementation effort. Both are sub-optimal algorithms that make use of support residues, a backtrack-stable and highly efficient data structure which was successfully used to develop the state-of-the-art AC-3rm algorithm. The two proposed algorithms, Max-RPCrm and L-Max-RPCrm are competitive with best, optimal Max-RPC algorithms, while being considerably simpler to implement. L-Max-RPCrm computes an approximation of the Max-RPC consistency, which is guaranteed to be strictly stronger than AC with the same space complexity and better worst-case time complexity than Max-RPCrm. In practice, the difference in filtering power between L-Max-RPCrm and standard Max-RPC is nearly indistinguishable on random problems. Max-RPCrm and L-Max-RPCrm are implemented into the Choco Constraint Solver through a strong consistency global constraint. This work opens new perspectives upon the development of strong consistency algorithms into constraint solvers.

We study novel approaches for solving of hard combinatorial problems by translation to Boolean Satisfiability (SAT). Our focus is on combinatorial problems that can be represented as a permutation of n objects, subject to additional constraints. In the case of the Hamiltonian Cycle Problem (HCP), these constraints are that two adjacent nodes in a permutation should also be neighbors in the original graph for which we search for a Hamiltonian cycle. We use the absolute SAT encoding of permutations, where for each of the n objects and each of its pos- sible positions in a permutation, a predicate is defined to indicate whether the object is placed in that position. For implementation of this predicate, we compare the direct and logarithmic encodings that have been used previously, against 16 hierarchical parameterizable encodings of which we explore 416 instantiations. We propose the use of enumerative adjacency constraints—that enumerate the possible neighbors of a node in a permutation — instead of, or in addition to the exclusivity adjacency constraints — that exclude impossible neighbors, and that have been applied previously. We study 11 heuristics for efficiently choosing the first node in the Hamiltonian cycle, as well as 8 heuristics for static CNF variable ordering. We achieve at least 4 orders of magnitude average speedup on HCP benchmarks from the phase transition region, relative to the previously used encodings for solving of HCPs via SAT, such that the speedup is increasing with the size of the graphs.

Constraint Programming is an attractive approach for solving AI planning problems by modelling them as Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). However, formulating effective constraint models of complex planning problems is challenging,  and CSPs resulting from standard approaches often require further enhancement to perform well. Common subexpression elimination is a computationally cheap and  general technique for improving CSPs, which can lead to a great reduction in instance size, solving time and search space. In this work we identify general causes of common subexpressions from three modelling techniques often used to encode planning problems into   constraints. We present four case studies of constraint  models of AI planning problems. In each, we describe the constraint model, highlight the sources of common subexpressions, and present an empirical analysis of the effects of eliminating common subexpressions.

Tailoring solver-independent constraint instances to target solvers is an important component of automated constraint modelling. We augment the tailoring process by a set of enhancement techniques of which many are successfully established in related fields, such as common subexpression elimination. Our aim is to apply these techniques in an efficient fashion,  since we tailor instance-wise, and not whole problem classes. We integrate automated enhancement into the tailoring procedure, which creates a novel setup with great potential, as our empirical analysis confirms: impressive speedups, additional propagation and instance  reduction, all for investing little computational effort.