MiniZinc is a solver agnostic modeling language for defining and solver combinatorial satisfaction and optimization problems. MiniZinc provides a solver independent modeling language which is now supported by constraint programming solvers, mixed integer programming solvers, SAT and SAT modulo theory solvers, and hybrid solvers. Since 2008 we have run the MiniZinc challenge every year, which compares and contrasts the different strengths of different solvers and solving technologies on a set of MiniZinc models. Here we report on what we have learnt from running the competition for 6 years.

This paper describes a polynomially-solvable class of temporal planning problems. Polynomiality follows from two assumptions. Firstly, by supposing that each sub-goal fluent can be established by at most one action, we can quickly determine which actions are necessary in any plan. Secondly, the monotonicity of sub-goal fluents allows us to express planning as an instance of STP≠ (Simple Temporal Problem with difference constraints). This class includes temporally-expressive problems requiring the concurrent execution of actions, with potential applications in the chemical, pharmaceutical and construction industries. We also show that any (temporal) planning problem has a monotone relaxation which can lead to the polynomial-time detection of its unsolvability in certain cases. Indeed we show that our relaxation is orthogonal to relaxations based on the ignore-deletes approach used in classical planning since it preserves deletes and can also exploit temporal information.

A CSP is defined by some variables (generally over finite domains) and constraints between these variables. Solving a CSP consists in finding assignments of the variables that satisfy the constraints. One of the main strength of CSP is declarativity: variables can be of various types (finite domains, floating point numbers, intervals, sets,...) and constraints as well (linear arithmetic constraints, set constraints, non linear constraints, Boolean constraints, symbolic constraints,...). Moreover, the so-called global constraints not only improve solving efficiency but also declarativity: they propose new constructs and relations such as alldifferent (to enforce that all the variables of a list have different values), cumulative (to schedule tasks sharing resources),... On the other hand, the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) [12] is restricted (in terms of declarativity) to Boolean variables and propositional formulae. However, SAT solvers can now handle huge SAT instances (millions of variables).

We establish optimal bounds on the number of nested propagation steps in $k$-consistency tests. It is known that local consistency algorithms such as arc-, path- and $k$-consistency are not efficiently parallelizable. Their inherent sequential nature is caused by long chains of nested propagation steps, which cannot be executed in parallel. This motivates the question "What is the minimum number of nested propagation steps that have to be performed by $k$-consistency algorithms on (binary) constraint networks with $n$ variables and domain size $d$?" It was known before that 2-consistency requires $\Omega(nd)$ and 3-consistency requires $\Omega(n^2)$ sequential propagation steps. We answer the question exhaustively for every $k\geq 2$: there are binary constraint networks where any $k$-consistency procedure has to perform $\Omega(n^{k-1}d^{k-1})$ nested propagation steps before local inconsistencies were detected. This bound is tight, because the overall number of propagation steps performed by $k$-consistency is at most $n^{k-1}d^{k-1}$.

We present a first theoretical analysis of the power of polynomial-time preprocessing for important combinatorial problems from various areas in AI. We consider problems from Constraint Satisfaction, Global Constraints, Satisfiability, Nonmonotonic and Bayesian Reasoning under structural restrictions. All these problems involve two tasks: (i) identifying the structure in the input as required by the restriction, and (ii) using the identified structure to solve the reasoning task efficiently. We show that for most of the considered problems, task (i) admits a polynomial-time preprocessing to a problem kernel whose size is polynomial in a structural problem parameter of the input, in contrast to task (ii) which does not admit such a reduction to a problem kernel of polynomial size, subject to a complexity theoretic assumption. As a notable exception we show that the consistency problem for the AtMost-NValue constraint admits a polynomial kernel consisting of a quadratic number of variables and domain values. Our results provide a firm worst-case guarantees and theoretical boundaries for the performance of polynomial-time preprocessing algorithms for the considered problems.

Earth observation satellites are space sensors which acquire data, compress and record it on board, and then download it to the ground. Because of the use of more and more sophisticated compression algorithms, the amount of data resulting from an acquisition is more and more unpredictable. In such conditions, planning satellite data download activities offline on the ground is more and more problematic. In this paper, we report the results of a work aiming at evaluating the positive impact of planning downloads onboard when the amount of data produced by each acquisition is known. The data download problem to be solved on board is an assignment and scheduling problem with unsharable resources, precedence constraints, time-dependent minimum durations, and a complex optimization criterion. The generic InCELL library is used to model constraints and criterion, to check non temporal constraints, to propagate temporal constraints, and to evaluate the criterion. On top of this library, greedy and local search algorithms have been designed to produce download plans with limited time and computing resources available on board.

We study a daily mine planning problem where, given a set of blocks we wishto mine, our task is to generate a mining sequence for the excavators suchthat blending resource constraints are met at various stages of thesequence. Such time-oriented resource constraintsare not traditionally handled well by automated planners. On the other hand,the remaining problem involves finding node-disjoint sequences withstate-dependent travel times on the arcs, which are highly challenging for a Mixed-Integer Program (MIP).In this paper, we address the problem of finding feasible sequences using a combined MIP and planning based decomposition approach. The MIP takes care of the resource constraints, and the planner solves the remaining sequence problem. We extend the notion of finding feasible sequences to finding good feasible sequences, by devising a heuristic objective function in the MIP, which improves the resulting search space for the planner.We empirically analyse the scalability of our approach on a benchmark data set, before demonstrating its effectiveness on a real world case study provided by our industry partner. These results demonstrate that by using a heuristic MIP, it is possible to obtain better makespan results with a suboptimal planner than by using an optimal planner with an uninformed MIP.

The Disjunctive Temporal Problem (DTP) involves the satisfaction of aset of constraints represented by disjunctive formulas of the form x 1 - y 1 <= r 1 or x 2 - y 2 <= r 2 or ... or x k - y k <= r k . DTP is a  general temporal reasoning problem which includes the well-known Temporal Constraint Satisfaction Problem (TCSP) introduced by Dechter, Meiri and Pearl. This paper describes a basic constraint satisfaction algorithm where several aspects of the current literature are integrated, in particular the so-called incremental forward checking.  Hence,two new extended solving strategies are proposed and experimentally evaluated. The new proposed strategies are very competitive with the best results available in the current literature. In addition, the analysis of the empirical results suggests future research directions concerning in particular the use of arc-consistency filtering strategies.

This paper summarizes the main existing approaches to propagate resource constraints in Constraint-Based scheduling and identifies some of their limitations for using them in an integrated planning and scheduling framework. We then describe two new algorithms to propagate resource constraints on discrete resources and reservoirs. Unlike most of the classical work in scheduling, our algorithms focus on the precedence relations between activities rather than on their absolute position in time. They are efficient even when the set of activities is not completely defined and when the time window of activities is large. These features explain why our algorithms are particularly suited for integrated planning and scheduling approaches. All our algorithms are illustrated with examples. Encouraging preliminary results are reported on pure scheduling problems.

The cutting plane method is an augmentative constrained optimization procedure that is often used with continuous-domain optimization techniques such as linear and convex programs. We investigate the viability of a similar idea within message passing -- which produces integral solutions -- in the context of two combinatorial problems: 1) For Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), we propose a factor-graph based on Held-Karp formulation, with an exponential number of constraint factors, each of which has an exponential but sparse tabular form. 2) For graph-partitioning (a.k.a., community mining) using modularity optimization, we introduce a binary variable model with a large number of constraints that enforce formation of cliques. In both cases we are able to derive surprisingly simple message updates that lead to competitive solutions on benchmark instances. In particular for TSP we are able to find near-optimal solutions in the time that empirically grows with N^3, demonstrating that augmentation is practical and efficient.