To celebrate the first 25 years of the International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP) the editors invited the authors of the most cited paper of each year to write a commentary on their paper. This report describes our reflections on the CP 2014 paper "Incremental Cardinality Constraints for MaxSAT" and its impact on the Maximum Satisfiability community and beyond.

Counting solutions for a combinatorial problem has been identified as an important concern within the Artificial Intelligence field. It is indeed very helpful when exploring the structure of the solution space. In this context, this paper revisits the computation process to count solutions for the global cardinality constraint in the context of counting-based search. It first highlights an error and then presents a way to correct the upper bound on the number of solutions for this constraint.

This is an ongoing series about: How to build a constraint solver? If you haven't read this post: Perfect as it is part 1;) More than 2 years ago I wrote a Sudoku solver in Python. I really enjoyed it and therefore I've spend some time to do the same in Julia just faster;) Then I wanted to build a whole constraint-programming solver in Julia. Well I actually still want to do it. It will be hard but fun.

The CP 2002 paper entitled "Breaking Row and Column Symmetries in Matrix Models" by Flener et al. [6] describes some of the first work for identifying and analyzing row and column symmetry in mat rix models and for efficiently and effectively dealing with such symmetry u sing static symmetry-breaking ordering constraints. This commentary provides a retrospective on that work and highlights some of the subsequent work on the topic.

In order to satisfy safety conditions, a reinforcement learned (RL) agent maybe constrained from acting freely, e.g., to prevent trajectories that might cause unwanted behavior or physical damage in a robot. We propose a general framework for augmenting a Markov decision process (MDP) with constraints that are described in formal languages over sequences of MDP states and agent actions. Constraint enforcement is implemented by filtering the allowed action set or by applying potential-based reward shaping to implement hard and soft constraint enforcement, respectively. We instantiate this framework using deterministic finite automata to encode constraints and propose methods of augmenting MDP observations with the state of the constraint automaton for learning. We empirically evaluate these methods with a variety of constraints by training Deep Q-Networks in Atari games as well as Proximal Policy Optimization in MuJoCo environments. We experimentally find that our approaches are effective in significantly reducing or eliminating constraint violations with either minimal negative or, depending on the constraint, a clear positive impact on final performance.

Finding interesting patterns is a challenging task in data mining. Constraint based mining is a well-known approach to this, and one for which constraint programming has been shown to be a well-suited and generic framework. Dominance programming has been proposed as an extension that can capture an even wider class of constraint-based mining problems, by allowing to compare relations between patterns. In this paper, in addition to specifying a dominance relation, we introduce the ability to specify an incomparability condition. Using these two concepts we devise a generic framework that can do a batch-wise search that avoids checking incomparable solutions. We extend the ESSENCE language and underlying modelling pipeline to support this. We use generator itemset mining problem as a test case and give a declarative specification for that. We also present preliminary experimental results on this specific problem class with a CP solver backend to show that using the incomparability condition during search can improve the efficiency of dominance programming and reduces the need for post-processing to filter dominated solutions.

Semantic Image Interpretation is the task of extracting a structured semantic description from images. This requires the detection of visual relationships: triples (subject,relation,object) describing a semantic relation between a subject and an object. A pure supervised approach to visual relationship detection requires a complete and balanced training set for all the possible combinations of (subject, relation, object). However, such training sets are not available and would require a prohibitive human effort. This implies the ability of predicting triples which do not appear in the training set. This problem is called zero-shot learning. State-of-the-art approaches to zero-shot learning exploit similarities among relationships in the training set or external linguistic knowledge. In this paper, we perform zero-shot learning by using Logic Tensor Networks, a novel Statistical Relational Learning framework that exploits both the similarities with other seen relationships and background knowledge, expressed with logical constraints between subjects, relations and objects. The experiments on the Visual Relationship Dataset show that the use of logical constraints outperforms the current methods. This implies that background knowledge can be used to alleviate the incompleteness of training sets.

In 1999, we introduced CSPLib, a benchmark library for the constraints community. Our CP-1999 poster paper about CSPLib discussed the advantages and disadvantages of building such a library. Unlike some other domains such as theorem proving, or machine learning, representation was then and remains today a major issue in the success or failure to solve problems. Benchmarks in CSPLib are therefore specified in natural language as this allows users to find good representations for themselves. The community responded positively and CSPLib has become a valuable resource but, as we discuss here, we cannot rest.

In 2000, I published a relatively comprehensive study of mappings between propositional satisfiability (SAT) and constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) [Wal00]. I analysed four different mappings of SAT problems into CSPs, and two of CSPs into SAT problems. For each mapping, I compared the impact of achieving arc-consistency on the CSP with unit propagation on the corresponding SAT problems, and lifted these results to CSP algorithms that maintain (some level of ) arc-consistency during search like FC and MAC, and to the Davis- Putnam procedure (which performs unit propagation at each search node). These results helped provide some insight into the relationship between propositional satisfiability and constraint satisfaction that set the scene for an important and valuable body of work that followed. I discuss here what prompted the paper, and what followed.

Despite a tremendous amount of work in the literature and in the commercial sectors, current approaches to multi-modal trip planning still fail to consistently generate plans that users deem optimal in practice. We believe that this is due to the fact that current planners fail to capture the true preferences of users, e.g., their preferences depend on aspects that are not modeled. An example of this could be a preference not to walk through an unsafe area at night. We present a novel multi-modal trip planner that allows users to upload auxiliary geographic data (e.g., crime rates) and to specify temporal constraints and preferences over these data in combination with typical metrics such as time and cost. Concretely, our planner supports the modes walking, biking, driving, public transit, and taxi, uses linear temporal logic to capture temporal constraints, and preferential cost functions to represent preferences. We show by examples that this allows the expression of very interesting preferences and constraints that, naturally, lead to quite diverse optimal plans.