As robots become ubiquitous in the workforce, it is essential that human-robot collaboration be both intuitive and adaptive. A robot's quality improves based on its ability to explicitly reason about the time-varying (i.e. learning curves) and stochastic capabilities of its human counterparts, and adjust the joint workload to improve efficiency while factoring human preferences. We introduce a novel resource coordination algorithm that enables robots to explore the relative strengths and learning abilities of their human teammates, by constructing schedules that are robust to stochastic and time-varying human task performance. We first validate our algorithmic approach using data we collected from a user study (n = 20), showing we can quickly generate and evaluate a robust schedule while discovering the latest individual worker proficiency. Second, we conduct a between-subjects experiment (n = 90) to validate the efficacy of our coordinating algorithm. Results from the human-subjects experiment indicate that scheduling strategies favoring exploration tend to be beneficial for human-robot collaboration as it improves team fluency (p = 0.0438), while also maximizing team efficiency (p < 0.001).

In Hierarchical Control, compositionality, abstraction, and task-transfer are crucial for designing versatile algorithms which can solve a variety of problems with maximal representational reuse. We propose a novel hierarchical and compositional framework called Jump-Operator Dynamic Programming for quickly computing solutions within a super-exponential space of sequential sub-goal tasks with ordering constraints, while also providing a fast linearly-solvable algorithm as an implementation. This approach involves controlling over an ensemble of reusable goal-conditioned polices functioning as temporally extended actions, and utilizes transition operators called feasibility functions, which are used to summarize initial-to-final state dynamics of the polices. Consequently, the added complexity of grounding a high-level task space onto a larger ambient state-space can be mitigated by optimizing in a lower-dimensional subspace defined by the grounding, substantially improving the scalability of the algorithm while effecting transferable solutions. We then identify classes of objective functions on this subspace whose solutions are invariant to the grounding, resulting in optimal zero-shot transfer.

Maximum a posteriori (MAP) inference in discrete-valued Markov random fields is a fundamental problem in machine learning that involves identifying the most likely configuration of random variables given a distribution. Due to the difficulty of this combinatorial problem, linear programming (LP) relaxations are commonly used to derive specialized message passing algorithms that are often interpreted as coordinate descent on the dual LP. To achieve more desirable computational properties, a number of methods regularize the LP with an entropy term, leading to a class of smooth message passing algorithms with convergence guarantees. In this paper, we present randomized methods for accelerating these algorithms by leveraging techniques that underlie classical accelerated gradient methods. The proposed algorithms incorporate the familiar steps of standard smooth message passing algorithms, which can be viewed as coordinate minimization steps. We show that these accelerated variants achieve faster rates for finding $\epsilon$-optimal points of the unregularized problem, and, when the LP is tight, we prove that the proposed algorithms recover the true MAP solution in fewer iterations than standard message passing algorithms.

We consider three important challenges in conference peer review: (i) reviewers maliciously attempting to get assigned to certain papers to provide positive reviews, possibly as part of quid-pro-quo arrangements with the authors; (ii) "torpedo reviewing," where reviewers deliberately attempt to get assigned to certain papers that they dislike in order to reject them; (iii) reviewer de-anonymization on release of the similarities and the reviewer-assignment code. On the conceptual front, we identify connections between these three problems and present a framework that brings all these challenges under a common umbrella. We then present a (randomized) algorithm for reviewer assignment that can optimally solve the reviewer-assignment problem under any given constraints on the probability of assignment for any reviewer-paper pair. We further consider the problem of restricting the joint probability that certain suspect pairs of reviewers are assigned to certain papers, and show that this problem is NP-hard for arbitrary constraints on these joint probabilities but efficiently solvable for a practical special case. Finally, we experimentally evaluate our algorithms on datasets from past conferences, where we observe that they can limit the chance that any malicious reviewer gets assigned to their desired paper to 50% while producing assignments with over 90% of the total optimal similarity. Our algorithms still achieve this similarity while also preventing reviewers with close associations from being assigned to the same paper.

We study constrained online convex optimization, where the constraints consist of a relatively simple constraint set (e.g. a Euclidean ball) and multiple functional constraints. Projections onto such decision sets are usually computationally challenging. So instead of enforcing all constraints over each slot, we allow decisions to violate these functional constraints but aim at achieving a low regret and a low cumulative constraint violation over a horizon of $T$ time slot. The best known bound for solving this problem is $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret and $\mathcal{O}(1)$ constraint violation, whose algorithms and analysis are restricted to Euclidean spaces. In this paper, we propose a new online primal-dual mirror prox algorithm whose regret is measured via a total gradient variation $V_*(T)$ over a sequence of $T$ loss functions. Specifically, we show that the proposed algorithm can achieve an $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{V_*(T)})$ regret and $\mathcal{O}(1)$ constraint violation simultaneously. Such a bound holds in general non-Euclidean spaces, is never worse than the previously known $\big( \mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T}), \mathcal{O}(1) \big)$ result, and can be much better on regret when the variation is small. Furthermore, our algorithm is computationally efficient in that only two mirror descent steps are required during each slot instead of solving a general Lagrangian minimization problem. Along the way, our bounds also improve upon those of previous attempts using mirror-prox-type algorithms solving this problem, which yield a relatively worse $\mathcal{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret and $\mathcal{O}(T^{2/3})$ constraint violation.

This paper presents a framework to tackle constrained combinatorial optimization problems using deep Reinforcement Learning (RL). To this end, we extend the Neural Combinatorial Optimization (NCO) theory in order to deal with constraints in its formulation. Notably, we propose defining constrained combinatorial problems as fully observable Constrained Markov Decision Processes (CMDP). In that context, the solution is iteratively constructed based on interactions with the environment. The model, in addition to the reward signal, relies on penalty signals generated from constraint dissatisfaction to infer a policy that acts as a heuristic algorithm. Moreover, having access to the complete state representation during the optimization process allows us to rely on memory-less architectures, enhancing the results obtained in previous sequence-to-sequence approaches. Conducted experiments on the constrained Job Shop and Resource Allocation problems prove the superiority of the proposal for computing rapid solutions when compared to classical heuristic, metaheuristic, and Constraint Programming (CP) solvers.

Constraint Optimization Problems (COP) are often considered without sufficient knowledge on the boundaries of the objective variable to optimize. When available, tight boundaries are helpful to prune the search space or estimate problem characteristics. Finding close boundaries, that correctly under- and overestimate the optimum, is almost impossible without actually solving the COP. This paper introduces Bion, a novel approach for boundary estimation by learning from previously solved instances of the COP. Based on supervised machine learning, Bion is problem-specific and solver-independent and can be applied to any COP which is repeatedly solved with different data inputs. An experimental evaluation over seven realistic COPs shows that an estimation model can be trained to prune the objective variables' domains by over 80%. By evaluating the estimated boundaries with various COP solvers, we find that Bion improves the solving process for some problems, although the effect of closer bounds is generally problem-dependent.

While feedback loops are known to play important roles in many complex systems, their existence is ignored in a large part of the causal discovery literature, as systems are typically assumed to be acyclic from the outset. When applying causal discovery algorithms designed for the acyclic setting on data generated by a system that involves feedback, one would not expect to obtain correct results. In this work, we show that---surprisingly---the output of the Fast Causal Inference (FCI) algorithm is correct if it is applied to observational data generated by a system that involves feedback. More specifically, we prove that for observational data generated by a simple and $\sigma$-faithful Structural Causal Model (SCM), FCI is sound and complete, and can be used to consistently estimate (i) the presence and absence of causal relations, (ii) the presence and absence of direct causal relations, (iii) the absence of confounders, and (iv) the absence of specific cycles in the causal graph of the SCM. We extend these results to constraint-based causal discovery algorithms that exploit certain forms of background knowledge, including the causally sufficient setting (e.g., the PC algorithm) and the Joint Causal Inference setting (e.g., the FCI-JCI algorithm).

Various structured output prediction problems (e.g., sequential tagging) involve constraints over the output space. By identifying these constraints, we can filter out infeasible solutions and build an accountable model. To this end, we present a general integer linear programming (ILP) framework for mining constraints from data. We model the inference of structured output prediction as an ILP problem. Then, given the coefficients of the objective function and the corresponding solution, we mine the underlying constraints by estimating the outer and inner polytopes of the feasible set. We verify the proposed constraint mining algorithm in various synthetic and real-world applications and demonstrate that the proposed approach successfully identifies the feasible set at scale. In particular, we show that our approach can learn to solve 9x9 Sudoku puzzles and minimal spanning tree problems from examples without providing the underlying rules. We also demonstrate results on hierarchical multi-label classification and conduct a theoretical analysis on how close the mined constraints are from the ground truth.

This competition paper presents microPhantom, a bot playing microRTS and participating in the 2020 microRTS AI competition. microPhantom is based on our previous bot POAdaptive which won the partially observable track of the 2018 and 2019 microRTS AI competitions. In this paper, we focus on decision-making under uncertainty, by tackling the Unit Production Problem with a method based on a combination of Constraint Programming and decision theory. We show that using our method to decide which units to train improves significantly the win rate against the second-best microRTS bot from the partially observable track. We also show that our method is resilient in chaotic environments, with a very small loss of efficiency only. To allow replicability and to facilitate further research, the source code of microPhantom is available, as well as the Constraint Programming toolkit it uses.