Large optimization problems with hard constraints arise in many settings, yet classical solvers are often prohibitively slow, motivating the use of deep networks as cheap "approximate solvers." Unfortunately, naive deep learning approaches typically cannot enforce the hard constraints of such problems, leading to infeasible solutions. In this work, we present Deep Constraint Completion and Correction (DC3), an algorithm to address this challenge. Specifically, this method enforces feasibility via a differentiable procedure, which implicitly completes partial solutions to satisfy equality constraints and unrolls gradient-based corrections to satisfy inequality constraints. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DC3 in both synthetic optimization tasks and the real-world setting of AC optimal power flow, where hard constraints encode the physics of the electrical grid. In both cases, DC3 achieves near-optimal objective values while preserving feasibility. Traditional approaches to constrained optimization are often expensive to run for large problems, necessitating the use of function approximators. Neural networks are highly expressive and fast to run, making them ideal as function approximators. However, while deep learning has proven its power for unconstrained problem settings, it has struggled to perform well in domains where it is necessary to satisfy hard constraints at test time. For example, in power systems, weather and climate models, materials science, and many other areas, data follows well-known physical laws, and violation of these laws can lead to answers that are unhelpful or even nonsensical.

This paper presents and evaluates two pruning techniques to reinforce the efficiency of constraint optimization solvers based on multi-valued decision-diagrams (MDD). It adopts the branch-and-bound framework proposed by Bergman et al. in 2016 to solve dynamic programs to optimality. In particular, our paper presents and evaluates the effectiveness of the local-bound (LocB) and rough upper-bound pruning (RUB). LocB is a new and effective rule that leverages the approximate MDD structure to avoid the exploration of non-interesting nodes. RUB is a rule to reduce the search space during the development of bounded-width-MDDs. The experimental study we conducted on the Maximum Independent Set Problem (MISP), Maximum Cut Problem (MCP), Maximum 2 Satisfiability (MAX2SAT) and the Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Windows (TSPTW) shows evidence indicating that rough-upper-bound and local-bound pruning have a high impact on optimization solvers based on branch-and-bound with MDDs. In particular, it shows that RUB delivers excellent results but requires some effort when defining the model. Also, it shows that LocB provides a significant improvement automatically; without necessitating any user-supplied information. Finally, it also shows that rough-upper-bound and local-bound pruning are not mutually exclusive, and their combined benefit supersedes the individual benefit of using each technique.

Multi-agent path finding (MAPF) attracts considerable attention in artificial intelligence community as well as in robotics, and other fields such as warehouse logistics. The task in the standard MAPF is to find paths through which agents can navigate from their starting positions to specified individual goal positions. The combination of two additional requirements makes the problem computationally challenging: (i) agents must not collide with each other and (ii) the paths must be optimal with respect to some objective. Two major approaches to optimal MAPF solving include (1) dedicated search-based methods, which solve MAPF directly, and (2) compilation-based methods that reduce a MAPF instance to an instance in a different well established formalism, for which an efficient solver exists. The compilation-based MAPF solving can benefit from advancements accumulated during the development of the target solver often decades long. We summarize and compare contemporary compilation-based solvers for MAPF using formalisms like ASP, MIP, and SAT. We show the lessons learned from past developments and current trends in the topic and discuss its wider impact.

Although pretrained language models (PTLMs) have been shown to contain significant amounts of world knowledge, they can still produce inconsistent answers to questions when probed, even after using specialized training techniques to reduce inconsistency. As a result, it can be hard to identify what the model actually "believes" about the world. Our goal is to reduce this problem, so systems are more globally consistent and accurate in their answers. Our approach is to add a memory component - a BeliefBank - that records a model's answers, and two mechanisms that use it to improve consistency among beliefs. First, a reasoning component - a weighted SAT solver - improves consistency by flipping answers that significantly clash with others. Second, a feedback component re-queries the model but using known beliefs as context. We show that, in a controlled experimental setting, these two mechanisms improve both accuracy and consistency. This is significant as it is a first step towards endowing models with an evolving memory, allowing them to construct a more coherent picture of the world.

The broad applicability of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) constitutes a general-purpose modeling framework for combinatorial optimization problems and are a required format for gate array and quantum annealing computers. QUBO annealers as well as other solution approaches benefit from starting with a diverse set of solutions with local optimality an additional benefit. This paper presents a new method for generating a set of one-flip local optima leveraging constraint programming. Further, as demonstrated in experimental testing, analysis of the solution set allows the generation of soft constraints to help guide the optimization process.

Using Constraint Satisfaction Problems to solve AI Planning Problems. Just like AI Planning as Satisfiability, we can use an existing technique -- Constraint Satisfaction Problems to help us solve AI Planning Problems. This way we can use the existing well-developed algorithms for solving CSPs to solve our AI Planning Problems. We will first go through the general introduction of CSPs. We then continue to see how to encode AI Planning Problems into CSPs.

Solving planning and scheduling problems for multiple tasks with highly coupled state and temporal constraints is notoriously challenging. An appealing approach to effectively decouple the problem is to judiciously order the events such that decisions can be made over sequences of tasks. As many problems encountered in practice are over-constrained, we must instead find relaxed solutions in which certain requirements are dropped. This motivates a formulation of optimality with respect to the costs of relaxing constraints and the problem of finding an optimal ordering under which this relaxing cost is minimum. In this paper, we present Generalized Conflict-directed Ordering (GCDO), a branch-and-bound ordering method that generates an optimal total order of events by leveraging the generalized conflicts of both inconsistency and suboptimality from sub-solvers for cost estimation and solution space pruning. Due to its ability to reason over generalized conflicts, GCDO is much more efficient in finding high-quality total orders than the previous conflict-directed approach CDITO. We demonstrate this by benchmarking on temporal network configuration problems, which involves managing networks over time and makes necessary tradeoffs between network flows against CDITO and Mixed Integer-Linear Programing (MILP). Our algorithm is able to solve two orders of magnitude more benchmark problems to optimality and twice the problems compared to CDITO and MILP within a runtime limit, respectively.

Multi-label classification (MC) is a standard machine learning problem in which a data point can be associated with a set of classes. A more challenging scenario is given by hierarchical multi-label classification (HMC) problems, in which every prediction must satisfy a given set of hard constraints expressing subclass relationships between classes. In this paper, we propose C-HMCNN(h), a novel approach for solving HMC problems, which, given a network h for the underlying MC problem, exploits the hierarchy information in order to produce predictions coherent with the constraints and to improve performance. Furthermore, we extend the logic used to express HMC constraints in order to be able to specify more complex relations among the classes and propose a new model CCN(h), which extends C-HMCNN(h) and is again able to satisfy and exploit the constraints to improve performance. We conduct an extensive experimental analysis showing the superior performance of both C-HMCNN(h) and CCN(h) when compared to state-of-the-art models in both the HMC and the general MC setting with hard logical constraints.

Autonomous robots may be able to adapt their behavior in response to changes in the environment. This is useful, for example, to efficiently handle limited resources or to respond appropriately to unexpected events such as faults. The architecture of a self-adaptive robot is complex because it should include automatic mechanisms to dynamically configure the elements that control robot behaviors. To facilitate the construction of this type of architectures, it is useful to have general solutions in the form of software tools that may be applicable to different robotic systems. This paper presents an original algorithm to dynamically configure the control architecture, which is applicable to the development of self-adaptive autonomous robots. This algorithm uses a constraint-based configuration approach to decide which basic robot behaviors should be activated in response to both reactive and deliberative events. The algorithm uses specific search heuristics and initialization procedures to achieve the performance required by robotic systems. The solution has been implemented as a software development tool called Behavior Coordinator CBC (Constraint-Based Configuration), which is based on ROS and open source, available to the general public. This tool has been successfully used for building multiple applications of autonomous aerial robots.

The Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) modeling and solution framework is required for quantum and digital annealers whose goal is the optimization of a well defined metric, the objective function. However, diverse suboptimal solutions may be preferred over harder to implement strict optimal ones. In addition, the decision-maker usually has insights that are not always efficiently translated into the optimization model, such as acceptable target, interval or range values. Multi-criteria decision making is an example of involving the user in the decision process. In this paper, we present two variants of goal-seeking QUBO that minimize the deviation from the goal through a tabu-search based greedy one-flip heuristic. Experimental results illustrate the efficacy of the proposed approach over Constraint Programming for quickly finding a satisficing set of solutions.