Despite a tremendous amount of work in the literature and in the commercial sectors, current approaches to multi-modal trip planning still fail to consistently generate plans that users deem optimal in practice. We believe that this is due to the fact that current planners fail to capture the true preferences of users, e.g., their preferences depend on aspects that are not modeled. An example of this could be a preference not to walk through an unsafe area at night. We present a novel multi-modal trip planner that allows users to up- load auxiliary geographic data (e.g., crime rates) and to specify temporal constraints and preferences over these data in combination with typical metrics such as time and cost. Concretely, our planner supports the modes walking, biking, driving, public transit, and taxi, uses linear temporal logic to capture temporal constraints, and preferential cost functions to represent preferences. We show by examples that this allows the expression of very interesting preferences and constraints that, naturally, lead to quite diverse optimal plans.

The Disjunctive Temporal Problem (DTP) involves the satisfaction of aset of constraints represented by disjunctive formulas of the form x1 - y1 r1 or x2 - y2 r2 or ... or xk - yk rk. DTP is a general temporal reasoning problem which includes the well-known Temporal Constraint Satisfaction Problem (TCSP) introduced by Dechter, Meiri and Pearl. This paper describes a basic constraint satisfaction algorithm where several aspects of the current literature are integrated, in particular the so-called incremental forward checking. Hence,two new extended solving strategies are proposed and experimentally evaluated. The new proposed strategies are very competitive with the best results available in the current literature. In addition, the analysis of the empirical results suggests future research directions concerning in particular the use of arc-consistency filtering strategies.

This paper summarizes the main existing approaches to propagate resource constraints in Constraint-Based scheduling and identifies some of their limitations for using them in an integrated planning and scheduling framework. We then describe two new algorithms to propagate resource constraints on discrete resources and reservoirs. Unlike most of the classical work in scheduling, our algorithms focus on the precedence relations between activities rather than on their absolute position in time. They are efficient even when the set of activities is not completely defined and when the time window of activities is large. These features explain why our algorithms are particularly suited for integrated planning and scheduling approaches. All our algorithms are illustrated with examples. Encouraging preliminary results are reported on pure scheduling problems.

We examine the use of constraint propagation for populating indoor game levels with enemies and other objects. We introduce a notion of path constraints, which bound some function over the possible paths a player might take, and show how to efficiently place objects while guaranteeing path constraints. This allows the system to guarantee that power-ups are balanced to the number of enemies occurring in the level, that they're placed early enough to be useful, that keys are not hidden behind the doors they are intended to unlock, and so on. We describe a constraint solver based on interval methods that allows natural processing of numeric constraints and show that it is efficient enough to be used even on very low-end platforms.

We also include a style specification, which provides a series of transformations to perform on the initial model; adding, removing or modifying various pieces. To generate the models, we use a two-stage constraint solving process in which we first solve for the layout of the final model before then solving for the specific layout of the individual Lego pieces. In this way, we provide a framework for models that incorporates a specific set of criteria but also can be modified to fit a designer's needs.

Combinatorial optimisation problems are ubiquitous in artificial intelligence. Designing the underlying models, however, requires substantial expertise, which is a limiting factor in practice. The models typically consist of hard and soft constraints, or combine hard constraints with an objective function. We introduce a novel setting for learning combinatorial optimisation problems from contextual examples. These positive and negative examples show - in a particular context - whether the solutions are good enough or not. We develop our framework using the MAX-SAT formalism as it is simple yet powerful setting having these features. We study the learnability of MAX-SAT models. Our theoretical results show that high-quality MAX-SAT models can be learned from contextual examples in the realisable and agnostic settings, as long as the data satisfies an intuitive "representativeness" condition. We also contribute two implementations based on our theoretical results: one leverages ideas from syntax-guided synthesis while the other makes use of stochastic local search techniques. The two implementations are evaluated by recovering synthetic and benchmark models from contextual examples. The experimental results support our theoretical analysis, showing that MAX-SAT models can be learned from contextual examples. Among the two implementations, the stochastic local search learner scales much better than the syntax-guided implementation while providing comparable or better models.

We introduce an approach to counterfactual inference based on merging information from multiple datasets. We consider a causal reformulation of the statistical marginal problem: given a collection of marginal structural causal models (SCMs) over distinct but overlapping sets of variables, determine the set of joint SCMs that are counterfactually consistent with the marginal ones. We formalise this approach for categorical SCMs using the response function formulation and show that it reduces the space of allowed marginal and joint SCMs. Our work thus highlights a new mode of falsifiability through additional variables, in contrast to the statistical one via additional data.

We study the problem of learning the preferences of drivers and planners in the context of last mile delivery. Given a data set containing historical decisions and delivery locations, the goal is to capture the implicit preferences of the decision-makers. We consider two ways to use the historical data: one is through a probability estimation method that learns transition probabilities between stops (or zones). This is a fast and accurate method, recently studied in a VRP setting. Furthermore, we explore the use of machine learning to infer how to best balance multiple objectives such as distance, probability and penalties. Specifically, we cast the learning problem as a structured output prediction problem, where training is done by repeatedly calling the TSP solver. Another important aspect we consider is that for last-mile delivery, every address is a potential client and hence the data is very sparse. Hence, we propose a two-stage approach that first learns preferences at the zone level in order to compute a zone routing; after which a penalty-based TSP computes the stop routing. Results show that the zone transition probability estimation performs well, and that the structured output prediction learning can improve the results further. We hence showcase a successful combination of both probability estimation and machine learning, all the while using standard TSP solvers, both during learning and to compute the final solution; this means the methodology is applicable to other, real-life, TSP variants, or proprietary solvers.

One of the most remarkable things about the human moral mind is its flexibility. We can make moral judgments about cases we have never seen before. We can decide that pre-established rules should be broken. We can invent novel rules on the fly. Capturing this flexibility is one of the central challenges in developing AI systems that can interpret and produce human-like moral judgment. This paper details the results of a study of real-world decision makers who judge whether it is acceptable to break a well-established norm: ``no cutting in line.'' We gather data on how human participants judge the acceptability of line-cutting in a range of scenarios. Then, in order to effectively embed these reasoning capabilities into a machine, we propose a method for modeling them using a preference-based structure, which captures a novel modification to standard ``dual process'' theories of moral judgment.

This paper introduces a formal definition of a Cyber-Physical System (CPS) in the spirit of the CPS Framework proposed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). It shows that using this definition, various problems related to concerns in a CPS can be precisely formalized and implemented using Answer Set Programming (ASP). These include problems related to the dependency or conflicts between concerns, how to mitigate an issue, and what the most suitable mitigation strategy for a given issue would be. It then shows how ASP can be used to develop an implementation that addresses the aforementioned problems. The paper concludes with a discussion of the potentials of the proposed methodologies.