The increasingly prevalent view that recommendation is a conversation between user and system is driving a renewed interest in approaches to system design that involve the user in meaningful ways. In addition to this the proliferation of mobile devices and the near-ubiquity of sensing technologies means that there are now many opportunities to capture real-life experiences, in real-time, providing a new source of raw material for case-based reasoning. In this paper we consider the availability of real-world exercise information, in this cases corresponding to jogging routes, and meth- ods by which we can involve a user in recommending such routes. We describe the Exercise Builder, a proof-of-concept application that attempts to help visitors to a new city to plan their jogging routes by combining case retrieval, interactive adaptation, and multimedia explanation in a single online service.

While similarity and retrieval in case-based reasoning (CBR) have received a lot of attention in the literature, other aspects of CBR, such as case reuse are less understood. Specifically, we focus on one of such, less understood, problems: "knowledge transfer". The issue we intend to elucidate can be expressed as follows: what knowledge present in a source case is transferred to a target problem in case-based inference? This paper presents a preliminary formal model of knowledge transfer and relates it to the classical notion of analogy.

Real-time Strategy (RTS) games are complex domains which are a significant challenge to both human and artificial intelligence (AI). For that reason, and although many AI approaches have been proposed for the RTS game AI problem, the AI of all commercial RTS games is scripted and offers a very static behavior subject to exploits. In this paper, we will focus on a case-based reasoning (CBR) approach to this problem, and concentrate on the process of case-acquisition. Specifically, we will describe 7 different techniques to automatically acquire plans by observing human demonstrations and compare their performance when using them in the Darmok 2 system in the context of an RTS game.

Conversational case-based reasoning systems use an interactive dialog to retrieve stored cases. Normally the ordering of questions in this dialog is chosen based only on their discriminativeness. However, because the user may not be able to answer all questions, even highly discriminative questions are not guaranteed to provide information. This paper presents a customization method CCBR systems can apply to adjust entropy-based discriminativeness considerations by predictions of user ability to answer questions. The method uses a naive Bayesian classifier to classify users into user groups based on the questions they answer, applies information from group profiles to predict which future questions they are likely to be able to answer, and selects the next questions to ask based on a combination of information gain and response likelihood. The method was evaluated for a mix of simulated user groups, each associated with particular probabilities for answering questions about each case indexing feature, in four sample domains. For simulated users with varying abilities to answer particular questions, results showed improvement in dialog length over a non-customized entropy-based approach in all test domains.

Robots are becoming increasingly common in home, industrial and medical environments. Their end users may know what they want the robots to do but lack the required technical skills to program them. We present a case-based reasoning approach for training a control module that controls a multi-purpose robotic platform. The control module learns by observing an expert performing a task and does not require any human intervention to program or modify the control module. To avoid requiring the control module to be modified when the robot it controls is repurposed, smart sensors and effectors register with the control module allowing it to dynamically modify the case structure it uses and how those cases are compared. This allows the hardware configuration to be modified, or completely changed, without having to change the control module. We present a case study demonstrating how a robot can be trained using learning by observation and later repurposed with new sensors and then retrained.

Over the past 11 years, this FLAIRS special track program has provided a focal point for the North American case-based reasoning (CBR) community, though it has drawn good international participation as well. Five papers were accepted this year. Ontañón presents seven different case acquisition techniques for CBR systems that use learning from demonstration and performs a comparative evaluation in the context of real-time strategy games. Ontañón and Plaza describe a preliminary formal model of knowledge transfer in case-based inference based on the idea of partial unification. Jalali and Leake present a new approach for ordering questions in conversational CBR systems that takes into account not just their discriminativeness but also the user's ability to answer.

Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR) has continuously been the preeminent international meeting on case-based reasoning (CBR). Through 2009, ICCBR had been a biennial conference, held in alternation with its sister conference, the European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR), which was located in Europe. At the 2009 ICCBR, the ICCBR Program Committee elected to extend an offer of consolidation with ECCBR. The offer was accepted by the ECCBR 2010 organizers and they considered it approved by the ECCBR community, as the two conferences shared a majority of Program Committee members. Therefore, starting in 2010, ICCBR and ECCBR are merged in a single conference series, called ICCBR.

Broadly construed Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) is the process of solving new problems based on the solution of past problems. The CBR systems' expertise is embodied in a collection (library) of past cases rather, than being encoded in classical rules. Each case typically contains a description of the problem plus a solution and/or the outcomes. When a problem is successfully solved, the experience is retained in order to solve similar problems in future. When an attempt to solve a problem fails, the reason for the failure is identified and remembered in order to avoid the same mistake in future. Thus CBR is a cyclic and integrated process of solving a problem, learning from this experience, solving a new problem, etc.

The study is from a base of accident scenarii in rail transport (feedback) in order to develop a tool to share build and sustain knowledge and safety and secondly to exploit the knowledge stored to prevent the reproduction of accidents / incidents. This tool should ultimately lead to the proposal of prevention and protection measures to minimize the risk level of a new transport system and thus to improve safety. The approach to achieving this goal largely depends on the use of artificial intelligence techniques and rarely the use of a method of automatic learning in order to develop a feasibility model of a software tool based on case based reasoning (CBR) to exploit stored knowledge in order to create know-how that can help stimulate domain experts in the task of analysis, evaluation and certification of a new system. Index Terms-- Accident scenario, Exploitation of knowledge Return of experience, Case based reasoning,Security.