We examine the Bayes-consistency of a recently proposed 1-nearest-neighbor-based multiclass learning algorithm. This algorithm is derived from sample compression bounds and enjoys the statistical advantages of tight, fully empirical generalization bounds, as well as the algorithmic advantages of a faster runtime and memory savings. We prove that this algorithm is strongly Bayes-consistent in metric spaces with finite doubling dimension -- the first consistency result for an efficient nearest-neighbor sample compression scheme. Rather surprisingly, we discover that this algorithm continues to be Bayes-consistent even in a certain infinitedimensional setting, in which the basic measure-theoretic conditions on which classic consistency proofs hinge are violated. This is all the more surprising, since it is known that k-NN is not Bayes-consistent in this setting. We pose several challenging open problems for future research.

Graph-based approaches to nearest neighbor search are popular and powerful tools for handling large datasets in practice, but they have limited theoretical guarantees. We study the worst-case performance of recent graph-based approximate nearest neighbor search algorithms, such as HNSW, NSG and DiskANN. For DiskANN, we show that its "slow preprocessing" version provably supports approximate nearest neighbor search query with constant approximation ratio and poly-logarithmic query time, on data sets with bounded "intrinsic" dimension. For the other data structure variants studied, including DiskANN with "fast preprocessing", HNSW and NSG, we present a family of instances on which the empirical query time required to achieve a "reasonable" accuracy is linear in instance size. For example, for DiskANN, we show that the query procedure can take at least 0.1n steps on instances of size n before it encounters any of the 5 nearest neighbors of the query.

Both supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms have been used to learn partition-based index structures for approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search. Existing supervised algorithms formulate the learning task as finding a partition in which the nearest neighbors of a training set point belong to the same partition element as the point itself, so that the nearest neighbor candidates can be retrieved by naive lookup or backtracking search. We formulate candidate set selection in ANN search directly as a multilabel classification problem where the labels correspond to the nearest neighbors of the query point, and interpret the partitions as partitioning classifiers for solving this task. Empirical results suggest that the natural classifier based on this interpretation leads to strictly improved performance when combined with any unsupervised or supervised partitioning strategy. We also prove a sufficient condition for consistency of a partitioning classifier for ANN search, and illustrate the result by verifying this condition for chronological k-d trees.

Therefore, the second property holds for any far away point y, i.e. y q cr. The first property holds for any close point x, i.e. x q r, since their projection value onto r Figure 1 shows the recall-speed comparison between Falconn++ and recent theoretical LSF frameworks [2, 3]. All 3 data sets use L = 100, α = {0.1, We use D = {128, 256, 256} for NYTimes, Glove200, and Glove300. Figure 1 shows superior performance of Falconn++ compared to the theoretical LSF with α = {0.1,

Researchers have used nearest neighbor graphs to transform classical machine learning problems on tabular data into node classification tasks to solve with graph representation learning methods. Such artificial structures often reflect the homophily assumption, believed to be a key factor in the performances of deep graph networks. In light of recent results demystifying these beliefs, we introduce a theoretical framework to understand the benefits of Nearest Neighbor (NN) graphs when a graph structure is missing. We formally analyze the Cross-Class Neighborhood Similarity (CCNS), used to empirically evaluate the usefulness of structures, in the context of nearest neighbor graphs. Moreover, we study the class separability induced by deep graph networks on a k-NN graph. Motivated by the theory, our quantitative experiments demonstrate that, under full supervision, employing a k-NN graph offers no benefits compared to a structure-agnostic baseline. Qualitative analyses suggest that our framework is good at estimating the CCNS and hint at k-NN graphs never being useful for such classification tasks under full supervision, thus advocating for the study of alternative graph construction techniques in combination with deep graph networks.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Nearest neighbor is a popular class of classification methods with many desirable properties. For a large data set which cannot be loaded into the memory of a single machine due to computation, communication, privacy, or ownership limitations, we consider the divide and conquer scheme: the entire data set is divided into small subsamples, on which nearest neighbor predictions are made, and then a final decision is reached by aggregating the predictions on subsamples by majority voting. We name this method the big Nearest Neighbor (bigNN) classifier, and provide its rates of convergence under minimal assumptions, in terms of both the excess risk and the classification instability, which are proven to be the same rates as the oracle nearest neighbor classifier and cannot be improved. To significantly reduce the prediction time that is required for achieving the optimal rate, we also consider the pre-training acceleration technique applied to the bigNN method, with proven convergence rate. We find that in the distributed setting, the optimal choice of the neighbor k should scale with both the total sample size and the number of partitions, and there is a theoretical upper limit for the latter. Numerical studies have verified the theoretical findings.