We are developing Companion Cognitive Systems, a new kind of software that can be effectively treated as a collaborator. Aside from their potential utility, we believe this effort is important because it focuses on three key problems that must be solved to achieve human-level AI: Robust reasoning and learning, interactivity, and longevity. We describe the ideas we are using to develop the first architecture for Companions: analogical processing, grounded in cognitive science for reasoning and learning, sketching and concept maps to improve interactivity, and a distributed agent architecture hosted on a cluster to achieve performance and longevity. We outline some results on learning by accumulating examples derived from our first experimental version.

The Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-02) and the Fourteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of AI (IAAI- 02) were positively received by those who attended. This report provides a few snapshots of the vast and varied content of the 2002 conferences. Proceedings of AAAI-02 and IAAI-02 are available from AAAI Press (www.- aaaipress.org).

Analogy has a rich history in Western civilization. Over the centuries, it has become reified in that analogical reasoning has sometimes been regarded as a fundamental cognitive process. In addition, it has become identified with a particular expressive format. The limitations of the modern view are illustrated by monster analogies, which show that analogy need not be regarded as something having a single form, format, or semantics. Analogy clearly does depend on the human ability to create and use well-defined or analytic formats for laying out propositions that express or imply meanings and perceptions. Beyond this dependence, research in cognitive science suggests that analogy relies on a number of genuinely fundamental cognitive capabilities, including semantic flexibility, the perception of resemblances and of distinctions, imagination, and metaphor. Extant symbolic models of analogical reasoning have various sorts of limitation, yet each model presents some important insights and plausible mechanisms. I argue that future efforts could be aimed at integration. This aim would include the incorporation of contextual information, the construction of semantic bases that are dynamic and knowledge rich, and the incorporation of multiple approaches to the problems of inference constraint.

Similarity in Cognition: A Review of Similarity and Analogical Reasoning

Analogical although analogy can help, as note that although still in its infancy reasoning is thus achieved in such well as hamper, learning. The role of and somewhat simplistic in character, systems by mainly keeping the analogy in learning is discussed by connectionist research might prove abstract relational microfeatures. Ann Brown and by Rand Spiro et al., to have an edge in tackling these Rumelhart proposes another way and the role of analogy in knowledge problems. The research described in for achieving analogical reasoning, acquisition is discussed by Brian Ross this book presents a grand challenge that is, "soft clamp," in which input and by John Bransford et al.; Stella and a future prospect for AI clamps can be overridden, and the Vosniadou studies the developmental researchers (traditional or connectionistic) rule of thumb is that the more concrete change in the use of analogy. Because in their endeavor to find a a feature is, the easier it can be part 3 of the book is of marginal better and more cognitively plausible overridden. The system finds the interest to AI, I do not discuss it any representation scheme.

Artificial Intelligence, 41[#1]:1-63.

In IJCAI-87, Proc. Tenth Intl. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Milan, Italy: Morgan Kaufmann, 1987, Vol. 1, pp. 264-270.

Informal note INCSLI-85-4, Center for the Study of Language and Information. Not available online. Alternative: Davies, Todd R.; Russell, Stuart J. A Logical Approach to Reasoning by Analogy. SRI International Technical Note 385, July 1987. Determination, uniformity, and relevance: Normative criteria for generalization and reasoning by analogy. In D. H. Helman (ed.), Analogical Reasoning, 227-250. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.