We initiate the study of multidimensional Bayesian utility maximization, focusing on the unit-demand setting where values are i.i.d.

Autonomous UI agents powered by AI have tremendous potential to boost human productivity by automating routine tasks such as filing taxes and paying bills. However, a major challenge in unlocking their full potential is security, which is exacerbated by the agent's ability to take action on their user's behalf. Existing tests for prompt injections in web agents either over-simplify the threat by testing unrealistic scenarios or giving the attacker too much power, or look at single-step isolated tasks. To more accurately measure progress for secure web agents, we introduce WASP--a new publicly available benchmark for end-to-end evaluation of Web Agent Security against Prompt injection attacks. Evaluating with WASP shows that even top-tier AI models, including those with advanced reasoning capabilities, can be deceived by simple, low-effort human-written injections in very realistic scenarios. Our end-to-end evaluation reveals a previously unobserved insight: while attacks partially succeed in up to 86% of the case, even state-ofthe-art agents often struggle to fully complete the attacker goals--highlighting the current state of security by incompetence.

However, existing algorithms either require strict monotonicity or only guarantee the convergence of averaged iterates, as in Fictitious Play in continuous time. We address this gap with the following theoretical result. First, we prove that the last-iterated policy of a proximal-point (PP) update with KL regularization converges to an equilibrium of MFG under non-strict monotonicity. Second, we see that each PP update is equivalent to finding the equilibria of a KL-regularized MFG. We then prove that this equilibrium can be found using Mirror Descent (MD) with an exponential last-iterate convergence rate. Building on these insights, we propose the Approximate Proximal-Point (APP) algorithm, which approximately implements the PP update via a small number of MD steps. Numerical experiments on standard benchmarks confirm that the APP algorithm reliably converges to the unregularized mean-field equilibrium without time-averaging.

Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems are increasingly adopted for complex language processing tasks that require communication and coordination among agents. However, these systems often suffer substantial overhead from repeated reprocessing of overlapping contexts across agents. In typical pipelines, once an agent receives a message from its predecessor, the full context-including prior turns-must be reprocessed from scratch, leading to inefficient processing. While key-value (KV) caching is an effective solution for avoiding redundant computation in single-agent settings where prefixes remain unchanged, it cannot be directly reused in multi-agent scenarios due to diverging prefixes introduced by agent-specific context extensions. We identify that the core challenge lies in the offset variance of KV-caches across agents.

LLM-agent systems often decompose high-level objectives into subtask dependency graphs, assuming that each subtask's output is reliable and conditionally independent of others given its parent responses. However, this assumption frequently breaks during execution, as ground-truth responses are inaccessible, leading to inter-agent misalignment--failures caused by inconsistencies and coordination breakdowns among agents [1]. To address this, we propose SEQCV, a dynamic framework for reliable execution under violated conditional independence. SEQCV executes subtasks sequentially, each conditioned on all prior verified responses, and performs consistency checks immediately after agents generate short token sequences. At each checkpoint, a token sequence is accepted only if it represents shared knowledge consistently supported across diverse LLM models; otherwise, it is discarded, triggering recursive subtask decomposition for finer-grained reasoning. Despite its sequential nature, SEQCV avoids repeated corrections on the same misalignment and achieves higher effective throughput than parallel pipelines. Across multiple reasoning and coordination tasks, SEQCV improves accuracy by up to 30% over existing LLM-agent systems.

Variant and gene interpretation are fundamental to personalized medicine and translational biomedicine. However, traditional approaches are manual and labor-intensive. Generative language models (LMs) can facilitate this process, accelerating the translation of fundamental research into clinically-actionable insights. While existing benchmarks have attempted to quantify the capabilities of LMs for interpreting scientific data, these studies focus on narrow tasks that do not translate to real-world research. To meet these challenges, we introduce CGBENCH, a robust benchmark that tests reasoning capabilities of LMs on scientific publications.

Academic poster generation is a crucial yet challenging task in scientific communication, requiring the compression of long-context interleaved documents into a single, visually coherent page. To address this challenge, we introduce the first benchmark and metric suite for poster generation, which pairs recent conference papers with author-designed posters and evaluates outputs on (i) Visual Quality--semantic alignment with human posters, (ii) Textual Coherence--language fluency, (iii) Holistic Assessment--six fine-grained aesthetic and informational criteria scored by a VLM-as-judge, and notably (iv) PaperQuiz--the poster's ability to convey core paper content as measured by VLMs answering generated quizzes. Building on this benchmark, we propose PosterAgent, a top-down, visualin-the-loop multi-agent pipeline: the (a) Parser distills the paper into a structured asset library; the (b) Planner aligns text-visual pairs into a binary-tree layout that preserves reading order and spatial balance; and the (c) Painter-Commenter loop refines each panel by executing rendering code and using VLM feedback to eliminate overflow and ensure alignment. In our comprehensive evaluation, we find that GPT-4o outputs--though visually appealing at first glance--often exhibit noisy text and poor PaperQuiz scores, and we find that reader engagement is the primary aesthetic bottleneck, as human-designed posters rely largely on visual semantics to convey meaning. Our fully open-source variants (e.g., based on the Qwen-2.5 series) outperform existing 4o-driven multi-agent systems across nearly all metrics, while using 87%fewer tokens. It transforms a 22-page paper into a finalized yet editable '.pptx' poster -- all for just $0.005. These findings chart clear directions for the next generation of fully automated poster-generation models.

Modern code generation has made significant strides in functional correctness and execution efficiency. However, these systems often overlook a critical dimension in real-world software development: maintainability. To handle dynamic requirements with minimal rework, we propose MaintainCoder as a pioneering solution. It integrates the Waterfall model, design patterns, and multi-agent collaboration to systematically enhance cohesion, reduce coupling, achieving clear responsibility boundaries and better maintainability. We also introduce MaintainBench, a benchmark comprising requirement changes and novel dynamic metrics on maintenance efforts. Experiments demonstrate that existing code generation methods struggle to meet maintainability standards when requirements evolve. In contrast, MaintainCoder improves dynamic maintainability metrics by more than 60% with even higher correctness of initial codes. Furthermore, while static metrics fail to accurately reflect maintainability and even contradict each other, our proposed dynamic metrics exhibit high consistency. Our work not only provides the foundation for maintainable code generation, but also highlights the need for more realistic and comprehensive code generation research.

One of the principal challenges in building VLM-powered GUI agents is visual grounding--localizing the appropriate screen region for action execution based on both the visual content and the textual plans. Most existing work formulates this as a text-based coordinate generation task. However, these approaches suffer from several limitations: weak spatial-semantic alignment due to lack of explicit spatial supervision; inability to handle ambiguous supervision targets, as singlepoint predictions penalize valid variations; and a mismatch between the dense nature of screen coordinates and the coarse, patch-level granularity of visual features extracted by models like Vision Transformers. In this paper, we propose GUI-Actor, a VLM-based method for coordinate-free GUI grounding. At its core, GUI-Actorintroduces an attention-based action head that learns to align a dedicated token with all relevant visual patch tokens, enabling the model to propose one or more action regions in a single forward pass. In line with this, we further design a grounding verifier to evaluate and select the most plausible action region from the candidates proposed for action execution. Extensive experiments show that GUI-Actoroutperforms prior state-of-the-art methods on multiple GUI action grounding benchmarks, with improved generalization to unseen screen resolutions and layouts. Notably, GUI-Actor-7B achieves scores of 40.7 with Qwen2-VL and 44.6 with Qwen2.5-VL as backbones, outperforming UI-TARS72B (38.1) on ScreenSpot-Pro, with significantly fewer parameters and training data. Furthermore, by incorporating the verifier, we find that fine-tuning only the newly introduced action head ( 100M parameters for 7B model) while keeping the VLM backbone frozen is sufficient to achieve performance comparable to previous state-of-the-art models, highlighting that GUI-Actor can endow the underlying VLM with effective grounding capabilities without compromising its general-purpose strengths.

Learning from multi-agent expert demonstrations, known as Multi-Agent Imitation Learning (MAIL), provides a promising approach to sequential decision-making. However, existing MAIL methods including Behavior Cloning (BC) and Adversarial Imitation Learning (AIL) face significant challenges: BC suffers from the compounding error issue, while the very nature of adversarial optimization makes AIL prone to instability. In this work, we propose Multi-Agent imitation by learning and sampling from FactorIzed Soft Q-function (MAFIS), a novel method that addresses these limitations for both online and offline MAIL settings. Built upon the single-agent IQ-Learn framework, MAFIS introduces the value decomposition network to factorize the imitation objective at agent level, thus enabling scalable training for multi-agent systems. Moreover, we observe that the soft Q-function implicitly defines the optimal policy as an energy-based model, from which we can sample actions via stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. This allows us to estimate the gradient of the factorized optimization objective for continuous control tasks, avoiding the adversarial optimization between the soft Q-function and the policy required by prior work. By doing so, we obtain a tractable and non-adversarial objective for both discrete and continuous multi-agent control. Experiments on common benchmarks including the discrete control tasks StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge v2 (SMACv2), Gold Miner, and Multi Particle Environments (MPE), as well as the continuous control task Multi-Agent MuJoCo (MaMuJoCo), demonstrate that MAFIS achieves superior performance compared with baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/LAMDA-RL/MAFIS.