Agents
Towards an Intelligent System for Risk Prevention and Management
Kebair, Fahem, Serin, Frederic
Making a decision in a changeable and dynamic environment is an arduous task owing to the lack of information, their uncertainties and the unawareness of planners about the future evolution of incidents. The use of a decision support system is an efficient solution of this issue. Such a system can help emergency planners and responders to detect possible emergencies, as well as to suggest and evaluate possible courses of action to deal with the emergency. We are interested in our work to the modeling of a monitoring preventive and emergency management system, wherein we stress the generic aspect. In this paper we propose an agent-based architecture of this system and we describe a first step of our approach which is the modeling of information and their representation using a multiagent system.
Driven by Compression Progress: A Simple Principle Explains Essential Aspects of Subjective Beauty, Novelty, Surprise, Interestingness, Attention, Curiosity, Creativity, Art, Science, Music, Jokes
I argue that data becomes temporarily interesting by itself to some self-improving, but computationally limited, subjective observer once he learns to predict or compress the data in a better way, thus making it subjectively simpler and more beautiful. Curiosity is the desire to create or discover more non-random, non-arbitrary, regular data that is novel and surprising not in the traditional sense of Boltzmann and Shannon but in the sense that it allows for compression progress because its regularity was not yet known. This drive maximizes interestingness, the first derivative of subjective beauty or compressibility, that is, the steepness of the learning curve. It motivates exploring infants, pure mathematicians, composers, artists, dancers, comedians, yourself, and (since 1990) artificial systems.
An Investigation Report on Auction Mechanism Design
Auctions are markets with strict regulations governing the information available to traders in the market and the possible actions they can take. Since well designed auctions achieve desirable economic outcomes, they have been widely used in solving real-world optimization problems, and in structuring stock or futures exchanges. Auctions also provide a very valuable testing-ground for economic theory, and they play an important role in computer-based control systems. Auction mechanism design aims to manipulate the rules of an auction in order to achieve specific goals. Economists traditionally use mathematical methods, mainly game theory, to analyze auctions and design new auction forms. However, due to the high complexity of auctions, the mathematical models are typically simplified to obtain results, and this makes it difficult to apply results derived from such models to market environments in the real world. As a result, researchers are turning to empirical approaches. This report aims to survey the theoretical and empirical approaches to designing auction mechanisms and trading strategies with more weights on empirical ones, and build the foundation for further research in the field.
Fuzzy inference based mentality estimation for eye robot agent
Yamazaki, Yoichi, Dong, Fangyan, Masuda, Yuta, Uehara, Yukiko, Kormushev, Petar, Vu, Hai An, Le, Phuc Quang, Hirota, Kaoru
Household robots need to communicate with human beings in a friendly fashion. To achieve better understanding of displayed information, an importance and a certainty of the information should be communicated together with the main information. The proposed intent expression system aims to convey this additional information using an eye robot. The eye motions are represented as states in a pleasure-arousal space model. Change of the model state is calculated by fuzzy inference according to the importance and certainty of the displayed information. This change influences the arousal-sleep coordinate in the space which corresponds to activeness in communication. The eye robot provides a basic interface for the mascot robot system which is an easy to understand information terminal for home environments in a humatronics society.
AAAI 2008 Workshop Reports
Anand, Sarabjot Singh (University of Warwick) | Bunescu, Razvan C. (Ohio University) | Carvalho, Vitor R. (Microsoft Live Labs) | Chomicki, Jan (University of Buffalo) | Conitzer, Vincent (Duke University) | Cox, Michael T. (BBN Technologies) | Dignum, Virginia (Utrecht University) | Dodds, Zachary (Harvey Mudd College) | Dredze, Mark (University of Pennsylvania) | Furcy, David (University of Wisconsin Oshkosh) | Gabrilovich, Evgeniy (Yahoo! Research) | Göker, Mehmet H. (PricewaterhouseCoopers) | Guesgen, Hans Werner (Massey University) | Hirsh, Haym (Rutgers University) | Jannach, Dietmar (Dortmund University of Technology) | Junker, Ulrich (ILOG) | Ketter, Wolfgang (Erasmus University) | Kobsa, Alfred (University of California, Irvine) | Koenig, Sven (University of Southern California) | Lau, Tessa (IBM Almaden Research Center) | Lewis, Lundy (Southern New Hampshire University) | Matson, Eric (Purdue University) | Metzler, Ted (Oklahoma City University) | Mihalcea, Rada (University of North Texas) | Mobasher, Bamshad (DePaul University) | Pineau, Joelle (McGill University) | Poupart, Pascal (University of Waterloo) | Raja, Anita (University of North Carolina at Charlotte) | Ruml, Wheeler (University of New Hampshire) | Sadeh, Norman M. (Carnegie Mellon University) | Shani, Guy (Microsoft Research) | Shapiro, Daniel (Applied Reactivity, Inc.) | Smith, Trey (Carnegie Mellon University West) | Taylor, Matthew E. (University of Southern California) | Wagstaff, Kiri (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) | Walsh, William (CombineNet) | Zhou, Ron (Palo Alto Research Center)
AAAI 2008 Workshop Reports
Anand, Sarabjot Singh (University of Warwick) | Bunescu, Razvan C. (Ohio University) | Carvalho, Vitor R. (Microsoft Live Labs) | Chomicki, Jan (University of Buffalo) | Conitzer, Vincent (Duke University) | Cox, Michael T. (BBN Technologies) | Dignum, Virginia (Utrecht University) | Dodds, Zachary (Harvey Mudd College) | Dredze, Mark (University of Pennsylvania) | Furcy, David (University of Wisconsin Oshkosh) | Gabrilovich, Evgeniy (Yahoo! Research) | Göker, Mehmet H. (PricewaterhouseCoopers) | Guesgen, Hans Werner (Massey University) | Hirsh, Haym (Rutgers University) | Jannach, Dietmar (Dortmund University of Technology) | Junker, Ulrich (ILOG) | Ketter, Wolfgang (Erasmus University) | Kobsa, Alfred (University of California, Irvine) | Koenig, Sven (University of Southern California) | Lau, Tessa (IBM Almaden Research Center) | Lewis, Lundy (Southern New Hampshire University) | Matson, Eric (Purdue University) | Metzler, Ted (Oklahoma City University) | Mihalcea, Rada (University of North Texas) | Mobasher, Bamshad (DePaul University) | Pineau, Joelle (McGill University) | Poupart, Pascal (University of Waterloo) | Raja, Anita (University of North Carolina at Charlotte) | Ruml, Wheeler (University of New Hampshire) | Sadeh, Norman M. (Carnegie Mellon University) | Shani, Guy (Microsoft Research) | Shapiro, Daniel (Applied Reactivity, Inc.) | Smith, Trey (Carnegie Mellon University West) | Taylor, Matthew E. (University of Southern California) | Wagstaff, Kiri (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) | Walsh, William (CombineNet) | Zhou, Ron (Palo Alto Research Center)
AAAI was pleased to present the AAAI-08 Workshop Program, held Sunday and Monday, July 13–14, in Chicago, Illinois, USA. The program included the following 15 workshops: Advancements in POMDP Solvers; AI Education Workshop Colloquium; Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems, Enhanced Messaging; Human Implications of Human-Robot Interaction; Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization and Recommender Systems; Metareasoning: Thinking about Thinking; Multidisciplinary Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling; Search in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics; Spatial and Temporal Reasoning; Trading Agent Design and Analysis; Transfer Learning for Complex Tasks; What Went Wrong and Why: Lessons from AI Research and Applications; and Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence: An Evolving Synergy.
The Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE 08): A Report
Hagras, Hani (University of Essex) | Callaghan, Vic (Washington State University) | Cook, Diane J. (University of Florida) | Helal, Abselsalam (Sumi)
The International Environments conference has been held four times now. The first meeting was held in 2005 at the University of Essex, the second in 2006 at the National Technical University of Athens, and the third in 2007 at the University of Ulm. The conference is unique in its field, providing a leading edge forum for the international community to present the latest academic research and commercial developments. The realization of intelligent environments requires the convergence of different prominent disciplines. As a result, the conference has relevance to individuals working in the fields of information and computer science, material engineering, artificial intelligence, architecture, health care, sociology, design, networking, and intelligent agents.
Report on the First Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI-08)
Garis, Hugo Roland de (Xiamen University) | Goertzel, Ben (Novamente LLC)
On a technical chaired by Sibley Verbeck (CEO of algorithmics hugely, for instance level, the work involved using a Electric Sheep Company); and the session we can now solve Boolean satisfaction logic-based AI system to control a humanoid on neural nets was chaired by problems with hundreds of virtual agent in the Second Randal Koene (a neuroscientist from thousands of variables. We can use automated Life virtual world, which interacted Boston University).
Using Game Theory for Los Angeles Airport Security
Pita, James (University of Southern California) | Jain, Manish (University of Southern California) | Ordóñez, Fernando (University of Southern California) | Portway, Christopher (University of Southern California) | Tambe, Milind (University of Southern California) | Western, Craig (University of Southern California) | Paruchuri, Praveen (Intelligent Automation, Inc.) | Kraus, Sarit (Bar Ilan University and University of Maryland)
Security at major locations of economic or political importance is a key concern around the world, particularly given the threat of terrorism. Limited security resources prevent full security coverage at all times, which allows adversaries to observe and exploit patterns in selective patrolling or monitoring, e.g. they can plan an attack avoiding existing patrols. Hence, randomized patrolling or monitoring is important, but randomization must provide distinct weights to different actions based on their complex costs and benefits. To this end, this paper describes a promising transition of the latest in multi-agent algorithms into a deployed application. In particular, it describes a software assistant agent called ARMOR (Assistant for Randomized Monitoring over Routes) that casts this patrolling/monitoring problem as a Bayesian Stackelberg game, allowing the agent to appropriately weigh the different actions in randomization, as well as uncertainty over adversary types. ARMOR combines two key features: (i) It uses the fastest known solver for Bayesian Stackelberg games called DOBSS, where the dominant mixed strategies enable randomization; (ii) Its mixed-initiative based interface allows users to occasionally adjust or override the automated schedule based on their local constraints. ARMOR has been successfully deployed since August 2007 at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to randomize checkpoints on the roadways entering the airport and canine patrol routes within the airport terminals. This paper examines the information, design choices, challenges, and evaluation that went into designing ARMOR.