Agents
Technology:
Country:
- Asia > Middle East > Israel > Tel Aviv District > Tel Aviv (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
Industry:
- Transportation (0.93)
- Government > Regional Government (0.46)
Technology:
Country:
- North America > United States > California (0.14)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.94)
- Information Technology > Communications > Networks (0.93)
Country:
- North America > United States > California (0.14)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.96)
- Information Technology > Communications > Networks (0.68)
Country:
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region > Dawei (0.04)
Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents > Agent Societies (0.68)
Country:
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.04)
Country:
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.04)
- North America > Dominican Republic (0.04)
Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents > Agent Societies (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.74)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.68)
Country:
Technology:
- Information Technology > Game Theory (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.46)
Country:
- Oceania > New Zealand > North Island > Auckland Region > Auckland (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
Genre:
- Questionnaire & Opinion Survey (0.94)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.94)
Industry:
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games (1.00)
- Education (0.68)
Technology:
Supplementary Materials for " Multi-Agent Meta-Reinforcement Learning " AT echnical Lemmas
From the three-points identity of the Bregman divergence (Lemma 3.1 of [9]), KL (x y) KL ( x y) = KL (x x) + ln x ln y,x x (12) The first term in (12) can be bounded by KL (x x) = By the Hölder's inequality, the second term in (12) is bounded as ln x ln y,x x ln x ln y Lemma 5. Consider a block diagonal matrix We prove the lemma via induction on N . This completes the induction proof.Lemma 6. We introduce one more notation before presenting the proof. This leads us to the initialization-dependent convergence rate of Algorithm 1, which we re-state and prove as follows. In addition, if we initialize the players' policies to be uniform policies, i.e., The rest of the proof follows by putting all the aforementioned results together.