We introduce EvalAI, an open source platform for evaluating and comparing machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence algorithms (AI) at scale. EvalAI is built to provide a scalable solution to the research community to fulfill the critical need of evaluating machine learning models and agents acting in an environment against annotations or with a human-in-the-loop. This will help researchers, students, and data scientists to create, collaborate, and participate in AI challenges organized around the globe. By simplifying and standardizing the process of benchmarking these models, EvalAI seeks to lower the barrier to entry for participating in the global scientific effort to push the frontiers of machine learning and artificial intelligence, thereby increasing the rate of measurable progress in this domain. Our code is available here.

Yvonne Hofstetter (* 1966 in Frankfurt am Main) is a German lawyer, essayist and non-fiction author. She attended a convent school of the Congregation of Jesus and studied law. Since 1999, she has been working internationally in software companies specializing in multi-agent systems for the defense and automated commerce industries, working in the fields of Artificial Intelligence, Industry 4.0 and Big Data.

Goal recognition is the problem of determining an agent's intent by observing her behaviour. Contemporary solutions for general task-planning relate the probability of a goal to the cost of reaching it. We adapt this approach to goal recognition in the strict context of path-planning. We show (1) that a simpler formula provides an identical result to current state-of-the-art in less than half the time under all but one set of conditions. Further, we prove (2) that the probability distribution based on this technique is independent of an agent's past behaviour and present a revised formula that achieves goal recognition by reference to the agent's starting point and current location only. Building on this, we demonstrate (3) that a Radius of Maximum Probability (i.e., the distance from a goal within which that goal is guaranteed to be the most probable) can be calculated from relative cost-distances between the candidate goals and a start location, without needing to calculate any actual probabilities. In this extended version of earlier work, we generalise our framework to the continuous domain and discuss our results, including the conditions under which our findings can be generalised back to goal recognition in general task-planning.

We investigate the problem of learning description logic ontologies from entailments via queries, using epistemic reasoning. We introduce a new learning model consisting of epistemic membership and example queries and show that polynomial learnability in this model coincides with polynomial learnability in Angluin's exact learning model with membership and equivalence queries. We then instantiate our learning framework to EL and show some complexity results for an epistemic extension of EL where epistemic operators can be applied over the axioms. Finally, we transfer known results for EL ontologies and its fragments to our learning model based on epistemic reasoning.

Although artificial intelligence holds promise for addressing societal challenges, issues of exactly which tasks to automate and the extent to do so remain understudied. We approach the problem of task delegability from a human-centered perspective by developing a framework on human perception of task delegation to artificial intelligence. We consider four high-level factors that can contribute to a delegation decision: motivation, difficulty, risk, and trust. To obtain an empirical understanding of human preferences in different tasks, we build a dataset of 100 tasks from academic papers, popular media portrayal of AI, and everyday life. For each task, we administer a survey to collect judgments of each factor and ask subjects to pick the extent to which they prefer AI involvement. We find little preference for full AI control and a strong preference for machine-in-the-loop designs, in which humans play the leading role. Our framework can effectively predict human preferences in degrees of AI assistance. Among the four factors, trust is the most predictive of human preferences of optimal human-machine delegation. This framework represents a first step towards characterizing human preferences of automation across tasks. We hope this work may encourage and aid in future efforts towards understanding such individual attitudes; our goal is to inform the public and the AI research community rather than dictating any direction in technology development.

Actor-critic algorithms learn an explicit policy (actor), and an accompanying value function (critic). The actor performs actions in the environment, while the critic evaluates the actor's current policy. However, despite their stability and promising convergence properties, current actor-critic algorithms do not outperform critic-only ones in practice. We believe that the fact that the critic learns Q^pi, instead of the optimal Q-function Q*, prevents state-of-the-art robust and sample-efficient off-policy learning algorithms from being used. In this paper, we propose an elegant solution, the Actor-Advisor architecture, in which a Policy Gradient actor learns from unbiased Monte-Carlo returns, while being shaped (or advised) by the Softmax policy arising from an off-policy critic. The critic can be learned independently from the actor, using any state-of-the-art algorithm. Being advised by a high-quality critic, the actor quickly and robustly learns the task, while its use of the Monte-Carlo return helps overcome any bias the critic may have. In addition to a new Actor-Critic formulation, the Actor-Advisor, a method that allows an external advisory policy to shape a Policy Gradient actor, can be applied to many other domains. By varying the source of advice, we demonstrate the wide applicability of the Actor-Advisor to three other important subfields of RL: safe RL with backup policies, efficient leverage of domain knowledge, and transfer learning in RL. Our experimental results demonstrate the benefits of the Actor-Advisor compared to state-of-the-art actor-critic methods, illustrate its applicability to the three other application scenarios listed above, and show that many important challenges of RL can now be solved using a single elegant solution.

Section is a key area of investigation for video game research 2 describes the large amount of background and related (Hendrikx et al. 2013; Togelius et al. 2011). PLG work, both for Angry Birds and adaptive level generation in can be extremely useful for increasing a game's length and general. Section 3 presents our proposed adaptive generation replayability, as it allows a large number of levels to be created method. Section 4 describes our conducted experiments and in a relatively short time. It is also possible to tailor the results. Sections 5 discusses what these results could mean generated levels towards specific user's playstyles, known as for both human players and agents, Section 6 concludes this adaptive level generation, which allows for a unique and personalised work and outlines future possibilities.

We achieve four objectives: (1) each agent is allowed to make a report that expresses her preference about violating her budget constraint, a feature not achieved by mechanisms that only elicit quasi-linear reports; (2) these reports are finite dimensional; (3) computation is feasible in polynomial time; and (4) incentive properties of envy-free mechanisms that elicit quasi-linear reports are preserved.

We consider the reinforcement learning problem of training multiple agents in order to maximize a shared reward. In this multi-agent system, each agent seeks to maximize the reward while interacting with other agents, and they may or may not be able to communicate. Typically the agents do not have access to other agent policies and thus each agent observes a non-stationary and partially-observable environment. In order to resolve this issue, we demonstrate a novel multi-agent training framework that first turns a multi-agent problem into a single-agent problem to obtain a centralized expert that is then used to guide supervised learning for multiple independent agents with the goal of decentralizing the policy. We additionally demonstrate a way to turn the exponential growth in the joint action space into a linear growth for the centralized policy. Overall, the problem is twofold: the problem of obtaining a centralized expert, and then the problem of supervised learning to train the multi-agents. We demonstrate our solutions to both of these tasks, and show that supervised learning can be used to decentralize a multi-agent policy.

A central challenge in reinforcement learning is discovering effective policies for tasks where rewards are sparsely distributed. We postulate that in the absence of useful reward signals, an effective exploration strategy should seek out {\it decision states}. These states lie at critical junctions in the state space from where the agent can transition to new, potentially unexplored regions. We propose to learn about decision states from prior experience. By training a goal-conditioned policy with an information bottleneck, we can identify decision states by examining where the model actually leverages the goal state. We find that this simple mechanism effectively identifies decision states, even in partially observed settings. In effect, the model learns the sensory cues that correlate with potential subgoals. In new environments, this model can then identify novel subgoals for further exploration, guiding the agent through a sequence of potential decision states and through new regions of the state space.