Agent-based Models (ABMs) are valuable tools for policy analysis. ABMs help analysts explore the emergent consequences of policy interventions in multi-agent decision-making settings. But the validity of inferences drawn from ABM explorations depends on the quality of the ABM agents' behavioral models. Standard specifications of agent behavioral models rely either on heuristic decision-making rules or on regressions trained on past data. Both prior specification modes have limitations. This paper examines the value of reinforcement learning (RL) models as adaptive, high-performing, and behaviorally-valid models of agent decision-making in ABMs. We test the hypothesis that RL agents are effective as utility-maximizing agents in policy ABMs. We also address the problem of adapting RL algorithms to handle multi-agency in games by adapting and extending methods from recent literature. We evaluate the performance of such RL-based ABM agents via experiments on two policy-relevant ABMs: a minority game ABM, and an ABM of Influenza Transmission. We run some analytic experiments on our AI-equipped ABMs e.g. explorations of the effects of behavioral heterogeneity in a population and the emergence of synchronization in a population. The experiments show that RL behavioral models are effective at producing reward-seeking or reward-maximizing behaviors in ABM agents. Furthermore, RL behavioral models can learn to outperform the default adaptive behavioral models in the two ABMs examined.

Chatbots are becoming ubiquitous in our lives. But many more of us communicate with them via the web, mobile applications, the telephone, text and other channels to gain access to both internal and external customer support. Indeed, 80% of companies plan to use some form of a chatbot by 2020. The value and benefits of this technology are especially strong with more intelligent chatbots, often called Virtual Agents. These Virtual Agents leverage natural language processing and advanced machine learning to automate service delivery, answer our questions, provide resolution, and free up analysts and service reps to concentrate on more complex and compelling requests and projects.

Throughout scientific history, overarching theoretical frameworks have allowed researchers to grow beyond personal intuitions and culturally biased theories. They allow to verify and replicate existing findings, and to link is connected results. The notion of self-play, albeit often cited in multiagent Reinforcement Learning, has never been grounded in a formal model. We present a formalized framework, with clearly defined assumptions, which encapsulates the meaning of self-play as abstracted from various existing self-play algorithms. This framework is framed as an approximation to a theoretical solution concept for multiagent training. On a simple environment, we qualitatively measure how well a subset of the captured self-play methods approximate this solution when paired with the famous PPO algorithm. We also provide insights on interpreting quantitative metrics of performance for self-play training. Our results indicate that, throughout training, various self-play definitions exhibit cyclic policy evolutions.

Automated game balancing has often focused on single-agent scenarios. In this paper we present a tool for balancing multi-player games during game design. Our approach requires a designer to construct an intuitive graphical representation of their meta-game target, representing the relative scores that high-level strategies (or decks, or character types) should experience. This permits more sophisticated balance targets to be defined beyond a simple requirement of equal win chances. We then find a parameterization of the game that meets this target using simulation-based optimization to minimize the distance to the target graph. We show the capabilities of this tool on examples inheriting from Rock-Paper-Scissors, and on a more complex asymmetric fighting game.

In this paper, we tackle multi-robot planning (MRP), which aims to route a fleet of robots in a warehouse so as to achieve the maximum reward in a limited amount of time, while not having the robots collide and obeying the constraints of individual robots. In MRP, individual robots may make multiple trips over a given time window and may carry multiple items on each trip. We optimize the efficiency of the warehouse, not the makespan, since we expect new orders to be continuously added. Our contributions are that (1) we adapt the integer linear programming (ILP) formulation and column generation (CG) approach for (prize collecting) vehicle routing (Desrochers et al. 1992, Stenger et al. 2013) to MRP and (2) adapt the seminal work of (Boland et al. 2017) to permit efficient optimization by avoiding consideration of every time increment. Routing problems for a fleet of robots in a warehouse are often treated as Multi-Agent Pathfinding problems (MAPF) (Stern et al. 2019).

This paper describes the application of reinforcement learning (RL) to multi-product inventory management in supply chains. The problem description and solution are both adapted from a real-world business solution. The novelty of this problem with respect to supply chain literature is (i) we consider concurrent inventory management of a large number (50 to 1000) of products with shared capacity, (ii) we consider a multi-node supply chain consisting of a warehouse which supplies three stores, (iii) the warehouse, stores, and transportation from warehouse to stores have finite capacities, (iv) warehouse and store replenishment happen at different time scales and with realistic time lags, and (v) demand for products at the stores is stochastic. We describe a novel formulation in a multi-agent (hierarchical) reinforcement learning framework that can be used for parallelised decision-making, and use the advantage actor critic (A2C) algorithm with quantised action spaces to solve the problem. Experiments show that the proposed approach is able to handle a multi-objective reward comprised of maximising product sales and minimising wastage of perishable products.

Human feedback is widely used to train agents in many domains. However, previous works rarely consider the uncertainty when humans provide feedback, especially in cases that the optimal actions are not obvious to the trainers. For example, the reward of a sub-optimal action can be stochastic and sometimes exceeds that of the optimal action, which is common in games or real-world. Trainers are likely to provide positive feedback to sub-optimal actions, negative feedback to the optimal actions and even do not provide feedback in some confusing situations. Existing works, which utilize the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm and treat the feedback model as hidden parameters, do not consider uncertainties in the learning environment and human feedback. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel feedback model that considers the uncertainty of human feedback. However, this incurs intractable calculus in the EM algorithm. To this end, we propose a novel approximate EM algorithm, in which we approximate the expectation step with the Gradient Descent method. Experimental results in both synthetic scenarios and two real-world scenarios with human participants demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed approach.

Emergentism and pragmatics are two research fields that study the dynamics of linguistic communication along substantially different timescales and intelligence levels. From the perspective of multi-agent reinforcement learning, they correspond to stochastic games with reinforcement training and stage games with opponent awareness. Given that their combination has been explored in linguistics, we propose computational models that combine short-term mutual reasoning-based pragmatics with long-term language emergentism. We explore this for agent communication referential games as well as in Starcraft II, assessing the relative merits of different kinds of mutual reasoning pragmatics models both empirically and theoretically. Our results shed light on their importance for making inroads towards getting more natural, accurate, robust, fine-grained, and succinct utterances.

Learning models of user behaviour is an important problem that is broadly applicable across many application domains requiring human-robot interaction. In this work, we show that it is possible to learn generative models for distinct user behavioural types, extracted from human demonstrations, by enforcing clustering of preferred task solutions within the latent space. We use these models to differentiate between user types and to find cases with overlapping solutions. Moreover, we can alter an initially guessed solution to satisfy the preferences that constitute a particular user type by backpropagating through the learned differentiable models. An advantage of structuring generative models in this way is that we can extract causal relationships between symbols that might form part of the user's specification of the task, as manifested in the demonstrations. We further parameterize these specifications through constraint optimization in order to find a safety envelope under which motion planning can be performed. We show that the proposed method is capable of correctly distinguishing between three user types, who differ in degrees of cautiousness in their motion, while performing the task of moving objects with a kinesthetically driven robot in a tabletop environment. Our method successfully identifies the correct type, within the specified time, in 99% [97.8 - 99.8] of the cases, which outperforms an IRL baseline. We also show that our proposed method correctly changes a default trajectory to one satisfying a particular user specification even with unseen objects. The resulting trajectory is shown to be directly implementable on a PR2 humanoid robot completing the same task.

Real world multi-agent tasks often involve varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities. Agents frequently do not know a priori how many other agents and non-agent entities they will need to interact with in order to complete a given task, requiring agents to generalize across a combinatorial number of task configurations with each potentially requiring different strategies. In this work, we tackle the problem of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) in such dynamic scenarios. We hypothesize that, while the optimal behaviors in these scenarios with varying quantities and types of agents/entities are diverse, they may share common patterns within sub-teams of agents that are combined to form team behavior. As such, we propose a method that can learn these subgroup relationships and how they can be combined, ultimately improving knowledge sharing and generalization across scenarios. This method, Attentive-Imaginative QMIX, extends QMIX for dynamic MARL in two ways: 1) an attention mechanism that enables model sharing across variable sized scenarios and 2) a training objective that improves learning across scenarios with varying combinations of agent/entity types by factoring the value function into imagined sub-scenarios. We validate our approach on both a novel grid-world task as well as a version of the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge [28] minimally modified for the dynamic scenario setting.