A great deal of research has been conducted in the consideration of meta-heuristic optimisation methods that are able to find global optima in settings that gradient based optimisers have traditionally struggled. Of these, so-called particle swarm optimisation (PSO) approaches have proven to be highly effective in a number of application areas. Given the maturity of the PSO field, it is likely that novel variants of the PSO algorithm stand to offer only marginal gains in terms of performance -- there is, after all, no free lunch. Instead of only chasing performance on suites of benchmark optimisation functions, it is argued herein that research effort is better placed in the pursuit of algorithms that also have other useful properties. In this work, a highly-general, interpretable variant of the PSO algorithm -- particle attractor algorithm (PAO) -- is proposed. Furthermore, the algorithm is designed such that the transition densities (describing the motions of the particles from one generation to the next) can be computed exactly in closed form for each step. Access to closed-form transition densities has important ramifications for the closely-related field of Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC). In order to demonstrate that the useful properties do not come at the cost of performance, PAO is compared to several other state-of-the art heuristic optimisation algorithms in a benchmark comparison study.

Centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE) is a widely-used learning paradigm that has achieved significant success in complex tasks. However, partial observability issues and the absence of effectively shared signals between agents often limit its effectiveness in fostering cooperation. While communication can address this challenge, it simultaneously reduces the algorithm's practicality. Drawing inspiration from human team cooperative learning, we propose a novel paradigm that facilitates a gradual shift from explicit communication to tacit cooperation. In the initial training stage, we promote cooperation by sharing relevant information among agents and concurrently reconstructing this information using each agent's local trajectory. We then combine the explicitly communicated information with the reconstructed information to obtain mixed information. Throughout the training process, we progressively reduce the proportion of explicitly communicated information, facilitating a seamless transition to fully decentralized execution without communication. Experimental results in various scenarios demonstrate that the performance of our method without communication can approaches or even surpasses that of QMIX and communication-based methods.

Many decision-making problems feature multiple objectives. In such problems, it is not always possible to know the preferences of a decision-maker for different objectives. However, it is often possible to observe the behavior of decision-makers. In multi-objective decision-making, preference inference is the process of inferring the preferences of a decision-maker for different objectives. This research proposes a Dynamic Weight-based Preference Inference (DWPI) algorithm that can infer the preferences of agents acting in multi-objective decision-making problems, based on observed behavior trajectories in the environment. The proposed method is evaluated on three multi-objective Markov decision processes: Deep Sea Treasure, Traffic, and Item Gathering. The performance of the proposed DWPI approach is compared to two existing preference inference methods from the literature, and empirical results demonstrate significant improvements compared to the baseline algorithms, in terms of both time requirements and accuracy of the inferred preferences. The Dynamic Weight-based Preference Inference algorithm also maintains its performance when inferring preferences for sub-optimal behavior demonstrations. In addition to its impressive performance, the Dynamic Weight-based Preference Inference algorithm does not require any interactions during training with the agent whose preferences are inferred, all that is required is a trajectory of observed behavior.

We introduce a new problem formulation, Double-Deck Multi-Agent Pickup and Delivery (DD-MAPD), which models the multi-robot shelf rearrangement problem in automated warehouses. DD-MAPD extends both Multi-Agent Pickup and Delivery (MAPD) and Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) by allowing agents to move beneath shelves or lift and deliver a shelf to an arbitrary location, thereby changing the warehouse layout. We show that solving DD-MAPD is NP-hard. To tackle DD-MAPD, we propose MAPF-DECOMP, an algorithmic framework that decomposes a DD-MAPD instance into a MAPF instance for coordinating shelf trajectories and a subsequent MAPD instance with task dependencies for computing paths for agents. We also present an optimization technique to improve the performance of MAPF-DECOMP and demonstrate how to make MAPF-DECOMP complete for well-formed DD-MAPD instances, a realistic subclass of DD-MAPD instances. Our experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of MAPF-DECOMP, with the ability to compute high-quality solutions for large-scale instances with over one thousand shelves and hundreds of agents in just minutes of runtime.

Many complex scenarios require the coordination of agents possessing unique points of view and distinct semantic commitments. In response, standpoint logic (SL) was introduced in the context of knowledge integration, allowing one to reason with diverse and potentially conflicting viewpoints by means of indexed modalities. Another multi-modal logic of import is linear temporal logic (LTL) - a formalism used to express temporal properties of systems and processes, having prominence in formal methods and fields related to artificial intelligence. In this paper, we present standpoint linear temporal logic (SLTL), a new logic that combines the temporal features of LTL with the multi-perspective modelling capacity of SL. We define the logic SLTL, its syntax, and its semantics, establish its decidability and complexity, and provide a terminating tableau calculus to automate SLTL reasoning. Conveniently, this offers a clear path to extend existing LTL reasoners with practical reasoning support for temporal reasoning in multi-perspective settings.

This work studies the problem of ad hoc teamwork in teams composed of agents with differing computational capabilities. We consider cooperative multi-player games in which each agent's policy is constrained by a private capability parameter, and agents with higher capabilities are able to simulate the behavior of agents with lower capabilities (but not vice-versa). To address this challenge, we propose an algorithm that maintains a belief over the other agents' capabilities and incorporates this belief into the planning process. Our primary innovation is a novel framework based on capability type structures, which ensures that the belief updates remain consistent and informative without constructing the infinite hierarchy of beliefs. We also extend our techniques to settings where the agents' observations are subject to noise. We provide examples of games in which deviations in capability between oblivious agents can lead to arbitrarily poor outcomes, and experimentally validate that our capability-aware algorithm avoids the anti-cooperative behavior of the naive approach in these toy settings as well as a more complex cooperative checkers environment.

Abstract: In applications that involve human-robot interaction (HRI), human-robot teaming (HRT), and cooperative human-machine systems, the inference of the human partner's intent is of critical importance. This paper presents a method for the inference of the human operator's navigational intent, in the context of mobile robots that provide full or partial (e.g., shared control) teleoperation. We propose the Machine Learning Operator Intent Inference (MLOII) method, which a) processes spatial data collected by the robot's sensors; b) utilizes a supervised machine learning algorithm to estimate the operator's most probable navigational goal online. The proposed method's ability to reliably and efficiently infer the intent of the human operator is experimentally evaluated in realistically simulated exploration and remote inspection scenarios. The results in terms of accuracy and uncertainty indicate that the proposed method is comparable to another state-of-the-art method found in the literature.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is about making computers that do the sorts of things that minds can do, and as we progress towards this goal, we tend to increasingly delegate human tasks to machines. However, AI systems usually do these tasks with an unusual imbalance of insight and understanding: new, deeper insights are present, yet many important qualities that a human mind would have previously brought to the activity are utterly absent. Therefore, it is crucial to ask which features of minds have we replicated, which are missing, and if that matters. One core feature that humans bring to tasks, when dealing with the ambiguity, emergent knowledge, and social context presented by the world, is reflection. Yet this capability is utterly missing from current mainstream AI. In this paper we ask what reflective AI might look like. Then, drawing on notions of reflection in complex systems, cognitive science, and agents, we sketch an architecture for reflective AI agents, and highlight ways forward.

It is challenging to quantify numerical preferences for different objectives in a multi-objective decision-making problem. However, the demonstrations of a user are often accessible. We propose an algorithm to infer linear preference weights from either optimal or near-optimal demonstrations. The algorithm is evaluated in three environments with two baseline methods. Empirical results demonstrate significant improvements compared to the baseline algorithms, in terms of both time requirements and accuracy of the inferred preferences. In future work, we plan to evaluate the algorithm's effectiveness in a multi-agent system, where one of the agents is enabled to infer the preferences of an opponent using our preference inference algorithm.

Constrained multiagent reinforcement learning (C-MARL) is gaining importance as MARL algorithms find new applications in real-world systems ranging from energy systems to drone swarms. Most C-MARL algorithms use a primal-dual approach to enforce constraints through a penalty function added to the reward. In this paper, we study the structural effects of this penalty term on the MARL problem. First, we show that the standard practice of using the constraint function as the penalty leads to a weak notion of safety. However, by making simple modifications to the penalty term, we can enforce meaningful probabilistic (chance and conditional value at risk) constraints. Second, we quantify the effect of the penalty term on the value function, uncovering an improved value estimation procedure. We use these insights to propose a constrained multiagent advantage actor critic (C-MAA2C) algorithm. Simulations in a simple constrained multiagent environment affirm that our reinterpretation of the primal-dual method in terms of probabilistic constraints is effective, and that our proposed value estimate accelerates convergence to a safe joint policy.