Differential privacy (DP), as a promising privacy-preserving model, has attracted great interest from researchers in recent years. Currently, the study on combination of machine learning and DP is vibrant. In contrast, another widely used artificial intelligence technique, the swarm intelligence (SI) algorithm, has received little attention in the context of DP even though it also triggers privacy concerns. For this reason, this paper attempts to combine DP and SI for the first time, and proposes a general differentially private swarm intelligence algorithm framework (DPSIAF). Based on the exponential mechanism, this framework can easily develop existing SI algorithms into the private versions. As examples, we apply the proposed DPSIAF to four popular SI algorithms, and corresponding analyses demonstrate its effectiveness. More interestingly, the experimental results show that, for our private algorithms, their performance is not strictly affected by the privacy budget, and one of the private algorithms even owns better performance than its non-private version in some cases. These findings are different from the conventional cognition, which indicates the uniqueness of SI with DP. Our study may provide a new perspective on DP, and promote the synergy between metaheuristic optimization community and privacy computing community.

Fully distributed estimation and tracking solutions to large-scale multi-agent networks suffer slow convergence and are vulnerable to network failures. In this paper, we aim to speed up the convergence and enhance the resilience of state estimation and tracking using a simple hierarchical system architecture wherein agents are clusters into smaller networks, and a parameter server exists to aid the information exchanges among networks. The information exchange among networks is expensive and occurs only once in a while. We propose two consensus + innovation algorithms for the state estimation and tracking problems, respectively. In both algorithms, we use a novel hierarchical push-sum consensus component. For the state estimation, we use dual averaging as the local innovation component. State tracking is much harder to tackle in the presence of dropping-link failures and the standard integration of the consensus and innovation approaches are no longer applicable. Moreover, dual averaging is no longer feasible. Our algorithm introduces a pair of additional variables per link and ensure the relevant local variables evolve according to the state dynamics, and use projected local gradient descent as the local innovation component. We also characterize the convergence rates of both of the algorithms under linear local observation model and minimal technical assumptions. We numerically validate our algorithm through simulation of both state estimation and tracking problems.

Learning-based control uses data to design efficient controllers for specific systems. When multiple systems are involved, experience transfer usually focuses on data availability and controller performance yet neglects robustness to variations between systems. In contrast, this letter explores experience transfer from a robustness perspective. We leverage the transfer to design controllers that are robust not only to the uncertainty regarding an individual agent's model but also to the choice of agent in a fleet. Experience transfer enables the design of safe and robust controllers that work out of the box for all systems in a heterogeneous fleet. Our approach combines scenario optimization and recent formulations for direct data-driven control without the need to estimate a model of the system or determine uncertainty bounds for its parameters. We demonstrate the benefits of our data-driven robustification method through a numerical case study and obtain learned controllers that generalize well from a small number of open-loop trajectories in a quadcopter simulation.

This paper addresses a novel multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL)-based positioning algorithm for multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) collaboration (i.e., UAVs work as mobile base stations). The primary objective of the proposed algorithm is to establish dependable mobile access networks for cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) communication, thereby facilitating the realization of high-quality intelligent transportation systems (ITS). The reliable mobile access services can be achieved in following two ways, i.e., i) energy-efficient UAV operation and ii) reliable wireless communication services. For energy-efficient UAV operation, the reward of our proposed MADRL algorithm contains the features for UAV energy consumption models in order to realize efficient operations. Furthermore, for reliable wireless communication services, the quality of service (QoS) requirements of individual users are considered as a part of rewards and 60GHz mmWave radio is used for mobile access. This paper considers the 60GHz mmWave access for utilizing the benefits of i) ultra-wide-bandwidth for multi-Gbps high-speed communications and ii) high-directional communications for spatial reuse that is obviously good for densely deployed users. Lastly, the comprehensive and data-intensive performance evaluation of the proposed MADRL-based algorithm for multi-UAV positioning is conducted in this paper. The results of these evaluations demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms other existing algorithms.

In the celebrated stable-matching problem, there are two sets of agents M and W, and the members of M only have preferences over the members of W and vice versa. It is usually assumed that each member of M and W is a single entity. However, there are many cases in which each member of M or W represents a team that consists of several individuals with common interests. For example, students may need to be matched to professors for their final projects, but each project is carried out by a team of students. Thus, the students first form teams, and the matching is between teams of students and professors. When a team is considered as an agent from M or W, it needs to have a preference order that represents it. A voting rule is a natural mechanism for aggregating the preferences of the team members into a single preference order. In this paper, we investigate the problem of strategic voting in the context of stable-matching of teams. Specifically, we assume that members of each team use the Borda rule for generating the preference order of the team. Then, the Gale-Shapley algorithm is used for finding a stable-matching, where the set M is the proposing side. We show that the single-voter manipulation problem can be solved in polynomial time, both when the team is from M and when it is from W. We show that the coalitional manipulation problem is computationally hard, but it can be solved approximately both when the team is from M and when it is from W.

The field of human-human-robot interaction (HHRI) uses social robots to positively influence how humans interact with each other. This objective requires models of human understanding that consider multiple humans in an interaction as a collective entity and represent the group dynamics that exist within it. Understanding group dynamics is important because these can influence the behaviors, attitudes, and opinions of each individual within the group, as well as the group as a whole. Such an understanding is also useful when personalizing an interaction between a robot and the humans in its environment, where a group-level model can facilitate the design of robot behaviors that are tailored to a given group, the dynamics that exist within it, and the specific needs and preferences of the individual interactants. In this paper, we highlight the need for group-level models of human understanding in human-human-robot interaction research and how these can be useful in developing personalization techniques. We survey existing models of group dynamics and categorize them into models of social dominance, affect, social cohesion, and conflict resolution. We highlight the important features these models utilize, evaluate their potential to capture interpersonal aspects of a social interaction, and highlight their value for personalization techniques. Finally, we identify directions for future work, and make a case for models of relational affect as an approach that can better capture group-level understanding of human-human interactions and be useful in personalizing human-human-robot interactions.

Human supervisors in multi-robot systems are primarily responsible for monitoring robots, but can also be assigned with secondary tasks. These tasks can act as interruptions and can be categorized as either intrinsic, i.e., being directly related to the monitoring task, or extrinsic, i.e., being unrelated. In this paper, we investigate the impact of these two types of interruptions through a user study ($N=39$), where participants monitor a number of remote mobile robots while intermittently being interrupted by either a robot fault correction task (intrinsic) or a messaging task (extrinsic). We find that task performance of participants does not change significantly with the interruptions but depends greatly on the number of robots. However, interruptions result in an increase in perceived workload, and extrinsic interruptions have a more negative effect on workload across all NASA-TLX scales. Participants also reported switching between extrinsic interruptions and the primary task to be more difficult compared to the intrinsic interruption case. Statistical significance of these results is confirmed using ANOVA and one-sample t-test. These findings suggest that when deciding task assignment in such supervision systems, one should limit interruptions from secondary tasks, especially extrinsic ones, in order to limit user workload.

Geometric regularity, which leverages data symmetry, has been successfully incorporated into deep learning architectures such as CNNs, RNNs, GNNs, and Transformers. While this concept has been widely applied in robotics to address the curse of dimensionality when learning from high-dimensional data, the inherent reflectional and rotational symmetry of robot structures has not been adequately explored. Drawing inspiration from cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, we introduce novel network structures for deep learning algorithms that explicitly capture this geometric regularity. Moreover, we investigate the relationship between the geometric prior and the concept of Parameter Sharing in multi-agent reinforcement learning. Through experiments conducted on various challenging continuous control tasks, we demonstrate the significant potential of the proposed geometric regularity in enhancing robot learning capabilities.

When humans cooperate, they frequently coordinate their activity through both verbal communication and non-verbal actions, using this information to infer a shared goal and plan. How can we model this inferential ability? In this paper, we introduce a model of a cooperative team where one agent, the principal, may communicate natural language instructions about their shared plan to another agent, the assistant, using GPT-3 as a likelihood function for instruction utterances. We then show how a third person observer can infer the team's goal via multi-modal Bayesian inverse planning from actions and instructions, computing the posterior distribution over goals under the assumption that agents will act and communicate rationally to achieve them. We evaluate this approach by comparing it with human goal inferences in a multi-agent gridworld, finding that our model's inferences closely correlate with human judgments (R = 0.96). When compared to inference from actions alone, we also find that instructions lead to more rapid and less uncertain goal inference, highlighting the importance of verbal communication for cooperative agents.

While it has long been recognized that a team of individual learning agents can be greater than the sum of its parts, recent work has shown that larger teams are not necessarily more effective than smaller ones. In this paper, we study why and under which conditions certain team structures promote effective learning for a population of individual learning agents. We show that, depending on the environment, some team structures help agents learn to specialize into specific roles, resulting in more favorable global results. However, large teams create credit assignment challenges that reduce coordination, leading to large teams performing poorly compared to smaller ones. We support our conclusions with both theoretical analysis and empirical results.