Incorporating symmetry as an inductive bias into multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has led to improvements in generalization, data efficiency, and physical consistency. While prior research has succeeded in using perfect symmetry prior, the realm of partial symmetry in the multi-agent domain remains unexplored. To fill in this gap, we introduce the partially symmetric Markov game, a new subclass of the Markov game. We then theoretically show that the performance error introduced by utilizing symmetry in MARL is bounded, implying that the symmetry prior can still be useful in MARL even in partial symmetry situations. Motivated by this insight, we propose the Partial Symmetry Exploitation (PSE) framework that is able to adaptively incorporate symmetry prior in MARL under different symmetry-breaking conditions. Specifically, by adaptively adjusting the exploitation of symmetry, our framework is able to achieve superior sample efficiency and overall performance of MARL algorithms. Extensive experiments are conducted to demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed framework over baselines. Finally, we implement the proposed framework in real-world multi-robot testbed to show its superiority.

The social world is replete with norms, an important aspect Going beyond continuous game theory, Aubert-Kato et al. of organising societies. Social norms reduce the degrees (2015) investigated the emergence of frugal and greedy of freedom in the actions of individuals, making them behaviours in an embodied version of a dilemma where more predictable and stabilising societies (FeldmanHall and agents varied in how long they exploited a food source Shenhav, 2019). Norms also enable unrelated agents to - the longer it exploits the food source, the more selfish manage shared resources (Mathew et al., 2013), thereby the agent is. Michaeli and Spiro (2015) showed how extending cooperation beyond genetic relatives (Richerson "liberal" and "conservative" punishment regimes can affect et al., 2016).

Many human-facing algorithms -- including those that power recommender systems or hiring decision tools -- are trained on data provided by their users. The developers of these algorithms commonly adopt the assumption that the data generating process is exogenous: that is, how a user reacts to a given prompt (e.g., a recommendation or hiring suggestion) depends on the prompt and not on the algorithm that generated it. For example, the assumption that a person's behavior follows a ground-truth distribution is an exogeneity assumption. In practice, when algorithms interact with humans, this assumption rarely holds because users can be strategic. Recent studies document, for example, TikTok users changing their scrolling behavior after learning that TikTok uses it to curate their feed, and Uber drivers changing how they accept and cancel rides in response to changes in Uber's algorithm. Our work studies the implications of this strategic behavior by modeling the interactions between a user and their data-driven platform as a repeated, two-player game. We first find that user strategization can actually help platforms in the short term. We then show that it corrupts platforms' data and ultimately hurts their ability to make counterfactual decisions. We connect this phenomenon to user trust, and show that designing trustworthy algorithms can go hand in hand with accurate estimation. Finally, we provide a formalization of trustworthiness that inspires potential interventions.

Ever-increasing ubiquity of data and computational resources in the last decade have propelled a notable transition in the machine learning paradigm towards more distributed approaches. Such a transition seeks to not only tackle the scalability and resource distribution challenges but also to address pressing privacy and security concerns. To contribute to the ongoing discourse, this paper introduces Holonic Learning (HoL), a collaborative and privacy-focused learning framework designed for training deep learning models. By leveraging holonic concepts, the HoL framework establishes a structured self-similar hierarchy in the learning process, enabling more nuanced control over collaborations through the individual model aggregation approach of each holon, along with their intra-holon commitment and communication patterns. HoL, in its general form, provides extensive design and flexibility potentials. For empirical analysis and to demonstrate its effectiveness, this paper implements HoloAvg, a special variant of HoL that employs weighted averaging for model aggregation across all holons. The convergence of the proposed method is validated through experiments on both IID and Non-IID settings of the standard MNISt dataset. Furthermore, the performance behaviors of HoL are investigated under various holarchical designs and data distribution scenarios. The presented results affirm HoL's prowess in delivering competitive performance particularly, in the context of the Non-IID data distribution.

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful technique for training intelligent agents, but understanding why these agents make specific decisions can be quite challenging. This lack of transparency in RL models has been a long-standing problem, making it difficult for users to grasp the reasons behind an agent's behaviour. Various approaches have been explored to address this problem, with one promising avenue being reward decomposition (RD). RD is appealing as it sidesteps some of the concerns associated with other methods that attempt to rationalize an agent's behaviour in a post-hoc manner. RD works by exposing various facets of the rewards that contribute to the agent's objectives during training. However, RD alone has limitations as it primarily offers insights based on sub-rewards and does not delve into the intricate cause-and-effect relationships that occur within an RL agent's neural model. In this paper, we present an extension of RD that goes beyond sub-rewards to provide more informative explanations. Our approach is centred on a causal learning framework that leverages information-theoretic measures for explanation objectives that encourage three crucial properties of causal factors: \emph{causal sufficiency}, \emph{sparseness}, and \emph{orthogonality}. These properties help us distill the cause-and-effect relationships between the agent's states and actions or rewards, allowing for a deeper understanding of its decision-making processes. Our framework is designed to generate local explanations and can be applied to a wide range of RL tasks with multiple reward channels. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate that our approach offers more meaningful and insightful explanations for the agent's action selections.

Synthetic data has made tremendous strides in various commercial settings including finance, healthcare, and virtual reality. We present a broad overview of prototypical applications of synthetic data in the financial sector and in particular provide richer details for a few select ones. These cover a wide variety of data modalities including tabular, time-series, event-series, and unstructured arising from both markets and retail financial applications. Since finance is a highly regulated industry, synthetic data is a potential approach for dealing with issues related to privacy, fairness, and explainability. Various metrics are utilized in evaluating the quality and effectiveness of our approaches in these applications. We conclude with open directions in synthetic data in the context of the financial domain.

Inter-agent relative localization is critical for many multi-robot systems operating in the absence of external positioning infrastructure or prior environmental knowledge. We propose a novel inter-agent relative 3D pose estimation system where each participating agent is equipped with several ultra-wideband (UWB) ranging tags. Prior work typically supplements noisy UWB range measurements with additional continuously transmitted data, such as odometry, leading to potential scaling issues with increased team size and/or decreased communication network capability. By equipping each agent with multiple UWB antennas, our approach addresses these concerns by using only locally collected UWB range measurements, a priori state constraints, and detections of when said constraints are violated. Leveraging our learned mean ranging bias correction, we gain a 19% positional error improvement giving us experimental mean absolute position and heading errors of 0.24m and 9.5 degrees respectively. When compared to other state-of-the-art approaches, our work demonstrates improved performance over similar systems, while remaining competitive with methods that have significantly higher communication costs. Additionally, we make our datasets available.

This study aims to explore the complex relationship between perceptual and cognitive interactions in multimodal data analysis,with a specific emphasis on spatial experience design in overseas Chinese gardens. It is found that evaluation content and images on social media can reflect individuals' concerns and sentiment responses, providing a rich data base for cognitive research that contains both sentimental and image-based cognitive information. Leveraging deep learning techniques, we analyze textual and visual data from social media, thereby unveiling the relationship between people's perceptions and sentiment cognition within the context of overseas Chinese gardens. In addition, our study introduces a multi-agent system (MAS)alongside AI agents. Each agent explores the laws of aesthetic cognition through chat scene simulation combined with web search. This study goes beyond the traditional approach of translating perceptions into sentiment scores, allowing for an extension of the research methodology in terms of directly analyzing texts and digging deeper into opinion data. This study provides new perspectives for understanding aesthetic experience and its impact on architecture and landscape design across diverse cultural contexts, which is an essential contribution to the field of cultural communication and aesthetic understanding.

This scoping survey focuses on our current understanding of the design space for task-oriented LLM systems and elaborates on definitions and relationships among the available design parameters. The paper begins by defining a minimal task-oriented LLM system and exploring the design space of such systems through a thought experiment contemplating the performance of diverse LLM system configurations (involving single LLMs, single LLM-based agents, and multiple LLM-based agent systems) on a complex software development task and hypothesizes the results. We discuss a pattern in our results and formulate them into three conjectures. While these conjectures may be partly based on faulty assumptions, they provide a starting point for future research. The paper then surveys a select few design parameters: covering and organizing research in LLM augmentation, prompting techniques, and uncertainty estimation, and discussing their significance. The paper notes the lack of focus on computational and energy efficiency in evaluating research in these areas. Our survey findings provide a basis for developing the concept of linear and non-linear contexts, which we define and use to enable an agent-centric projection of prompting techniques providing a lens through which prompting techniques can be viewed as multi-agent systems. The paper discusses the implications of this lens, for the cross-pollination of research between LLM prompting and LLM-based multi-agent systems; and also, for the generation of synthetic training data based on existing prompting techniques in research. In all, the scoping survey presents seven conjectures that can help guide future research efforts.

Multi-agent collaboration with Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrates proficiency in basic tasks, yet its efficiency in more complex scenarios remains unexplored. In gaming environments, these agents often face situations without established coordination protocols, requiring them to make intelligent inferences about teammates from limited data. This problem motivates the area of ad hoc teamwork, in which an agent may potentially cooperate with a variety of teammates to achieve a shared goal. Our study focuses on the ad hoc teamwork problem where the agent operates in an environment driven by natural language. Our findings reveal the potential of LLM agents in team collaboration, highlighting issues related to hallucinations in communication. To address this issue, we develop CodeAct, a general agent that equips LLM with enhanced memory and code-driven reasoning, enabling the repurposing of partial information for rapid adaptation to new teammates.