Question Answering
Fine-grained Late-interaction Multi-modal Retrieval for Retrieval Augmented Visual Question Answering (Appendix)
We chose the Google Search corpus [Luo et al., 2021] for our question-answering system as it provides good coverage of the knowledge needed and is publicly available. However, as noted by the authors of RA-VQA, additional knowledge bases may be required to answer some questions correctly. Future work may address the issue by improving the quality and expanding the coverage of knowledge. We do not perceive any immediate ethical concerns associated with the misuse of our proposed system. There is a possibility that the trained KB-VQA system might generate inappropriate or biased content as a result of the training data biases during LLM and LMM pre-training and fine-tuning.
Fine-grained Late-interaction Multi-modal Retrieval for Retrieval Augmented Visual Question Answering
Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) requires VQA systems to utilize knowledge from external knowledge bases to answer visually-grounded questions. Retrieval-Augmented Visual Question Answering (RA-VQA), a strong framework to tackle KB-VQA, first retrieves related documents with Dense Passage Retrieval (DPR) and then uses them to answer questions. This paper proposes Fine-grained Late-interaction Multi-modal Retrieval (FLMR) which significantly improves knowledge retrieval in RA-VQA. FLMR addresses two major limitations in RA-VQA's retriever: (1) the image representations obtained via image-to-text transforms can be incomplete and inaccurate and (2) relevance scores between queries and documents are computed with one-dimensional embeddings, which can be insensitive to finer-grained relevance. FLMR overcomes these limitations by obtaining image representations that complement those from the image-totext transforms using a vision model aligned with an existing text-based retriever through a simple alignment network. FLMR also encodes images and questions using multi-dimensional embeddings to capture finer-grained relevance between queries and documents. FLMR significantly improves the original RA-VQA retriever's PRRecall@5 by approximately 8%. Finally, we equipped RA-VQA with two state-of-the-art large multi-modal/language models to achieve 61% VQA score in the OK-VQA dataset.
Debiased Visual Question Answering from Feature and Sample Perspectives
Visual question answering (VQA) is designed to examine the visual-textual reasoning ability of an intelligent agent. However, recent observations show that many VQA models may only capture the biases between questions and answers in a dataset rather than showing real reasoning abilities. For example, given a question, some VQA models tend to output the answer that occurs frequently in the dataset and ignore the images. To reduce this tendency, existing methods focus on weakening the language bias. Meanwhile, only a few works also consider vision bias implicitly.
Dialog-to-Action: Conversational Question Answering Over a Large-Scale Knowledge Base
Daya Guo, Duyu Tang, Nan Duan, Ming Zhou, Jian Yin
We present an approach to map utterances in conversation to logical forms, which will be executed on a large-scale knowledge base. To handle enormous ellipsis phenomena in conversation, we introduce dialog memory management to manipulate historical entities, predicates, and logical forms when inferring the logical form of current utterances. Dialog memory management is embodied in a generative model, in which a logical form is interpreted in a top-down manner following a small and flexible grammar. We learn the model from denotations without explicit annotation of logical forms, and evaluate it on a large-scale dataset consisting of 200K dialogs over 12.8M entities. Results verify the benefits of modeling dialog memory, and show that our semantic parsing-based approach outperforms a memory network based encoder-decoder model by a huge margin.
Supplementary Materials for MEQA: A Benchmark for Multi-hop Event-centric Question Answering with Explanations
We utilize an open and widely used data format, i.e., JSON format, for the MEQA dataset. "context": "Roadside IED kills Russian major general [...]", # The context of the question "question": "Who died before AI-monitor reported it online?", "What event contains Al-Monitor is the communicator? "What event is after #1 has a victim? "Who died in the #2? major general,local commander,lieutenant general" We present a list of Datasheets [Gebru et al., 2021] for the MEQA dataset, synthesizing many of the For what purpose was the dataset created?