Bard is powered by a research large language model (LLM), specifically a lightweight and optimized version of LaMDA, and will be updated with newer, more capable models over time. It's grounded in Google's understanding of quality information. You can think of an LLM as a prediction engine. When given a prompt, it generates a response by selecting, one word at a time, from words that are likely to come next. We continue to see that the more people use them, the better LLMs get at predicting what responses might be helpful.

Google has a lot riding on this launch. Microsoft partnered with OpenAI to make an aggressive play for Google's top spot in search. Meanwhile, Google blundered straight out of the gate when it first tried to respond. In a teaser clip for Bard that the company put out in February, the chatbot was shown making a factual error. Google's value fell by $100 billion overnight.

Bard is a descendant of an earlier language model of Google's called Lamda, which was never fully released to the public. It did, however, attract a lot of attention when one of the engineers who worked on it claimed its answers were so compelling that he believed it was sentient. Google denied the claims and he was fired.

Can Google save its golden goose or will it simply kill it trying? That's the question that lurks behind the launch of the company's Bard chatbot, hurriedly announced after the overnight success of ChatGPT in early 2023. With Bard, Google has to walk a tightrope: offer users an experience that can compete with the AI-powered Bing Chat and ChatGPT without cannibalising its enormously profitable search business in the process. And it has to do all that under the sort of scrutiny an upstart competitor may be able to avoid, but a market leader has to tackle head-on. It's an interesting quirk when ChatGPT "hallucinates" false information, but it's a very different feeling when AI backed by the third-largest company in the world does the same. At the bottom of every Bard conversation is a disclaimer: "Bard may display inaccurate or offensive information that doesn't represent Google's views."

Google isn't used to playing catch-up in either artificial intelligence or search, but today the company is hustling to show that it hasn't lost its edge. It's starting the rollout of a chatbot called Bard to do battle with the sensationally popular ChatGPT. Bard, like ChatGPT, will respond to questions about and discuss an almost inexhaustible range of subjects with what sometimes seems like humanlike understanding. Google showed WIRED several examples, including asking for activities for a child who is interested in bowling and requesting 20 books to read this year. Bard is also like ChatGPT in that it will sometimes make things up and act weird.

Time is running short to limit global warming to 1.5 C (2.7 F) above preindustrial levels, but there are feasible and effective solutions on the table, according to a new UN climate report. Despite decades of warnings from scientists, global greenhouse-gas emissions are still climbing, hitting a record high in 2022. If humanity wants to limit the worst effects of climate change, annual greenhouse-gas emissions will need to be cut by nearly half between now and 2030, according to the report. That will be complicated and expensive. But it is nonetheless doable, and the UN listed a number of specific ways we can achieve it.

Are you someone who values reliable and insightful information? If so, then you know that quality content takes time, effort, and resources to produce. That's where you come in! Your support helps us keep our content flowing and accessible to all. Our mission is to deliver valuable insights on a variety of subjects, and we can't do it without you.

AI technology is becoming so popular in the business sector, as it can be used to automate processes and create new, creative solutions. For example, chatbots and virtual assistants that can help businesses improve customer service. By the end of 2023, AI is expected to become even more standard in the workplace, with mind blowing tools such as OpenAI's ChatGPT becoming readily available AI is revolutionising the way businesses operate and allowing them to make better decisions faster than ever before. AI is not new, but it has become a hot trend in recent years, and more, so in the last few months with the introduction of ChatGPT there's countless potential applications across various industries, in particular the creative arts. It is significantly changing the way creatives work and has the potential to revolutionise the creative industry by automating certain tasks, providing new tools for creativity, and increasing efficiency in production for artists, designers, writers, photographers, musicians or, directors.

ChatGPT went offline and temporarily became inaccessible on Monday after some users discovered that they could see the titles of other people's chat histories. People posted screenshots of their ChatGPT UI on social networks like Reddit and Twitter, showing sidebars populated with chats they said weren't theirs. While they could only see the titles and not the entirety of other people's conversations, the incident still highlights the need to be mindful when it comes with sharing details with or writing up questions for the chatbot. An OpenAI spokesperson told Bloomberg that the company temporarily disabled ChatGPT after it became aware of these reports. Apparently, a bug in an open source software that the company has yet to name had caused the issue, but OpenAI is still investigating to figure out what triggered it exactly.

If you have been using twitter recently I bet that from the last 10 tweets 5 of them are linked to AI and the rise of chatGPT. Looking at those tweets AI tools are going to change the world as we know it. This is even more significant in the case of Education and in particular in Higher Education where most of the traditional methods of assessments are based on essay that consists on pieces of written work where students have to answer questions in a specific number of words. A lot of messages that I hear from institutions, and normally from traditional institutions, is that we need to ban chatGPT as this is a danger and a temptation to student to cheat and create this contractual cheating situation were students are submitting work that is not they original work. I think that this view is completely wrong and it is just a way to avoid the problem without thinking first why there is a problem and second what is actually AI and the possible benefits that can bring to education, learning outcomes and yes to assessments.