Contrastive learning has been proven to be effective in learning better sentence representations. However, to train a contrastive learning model, large numbers of labeled sentences are required to construct positive and negative pairs explicitly, such as those in natural language inference (NLI) datasets. Unfortunately, acquiring sufficient high-quality labeled data can be both time-consuming and resource-intensive, leading researchers to focus on developing methods for learning unsupervised sentence representations. As there is no clear relationship between these unstructured randomly-sampled sentences, building positive and negative pairs over them is tricky and problematic. To tackle these challenges, in this paper, we propose SemCSR, a semantic-aware contrastive sentence representation framework. By leveraging the generation and evaluation capabilities of large language models (LLMs), we can automatically construct a high-quality NLI-style corpus without any human annotation, and further incorporate the generated sentence pairs into learning a contrastive sentence representation model. Extensive experiments and comprehensive analyses demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework for learning a better sentence representation with LLMs.

As large language models (LLMs) become more prevalent, there is a growing need for new and improved quantization methods that can meet the computationalast layer demands of these modern architectures while maintaining the accuracy. In this paper, we present TEQ, a trainable equivalent transformation that preserves the FP32 precision of the model output while taking advantage of low-precision quantization, especially 3 and 4 bits weight-only quantization. The training process is lightweight, requiring only 1K steps and fewer than 0.1 percent of the original model's trainable parameters. Furthermore, the transformation does not add any computational overhead during inference. Our results are on-par with the state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods on typical LLMs. Our approach can be combined with other methods to achieve even better performance. The code is available at https://github.com/intel/neural-compressor.

As voice assistants cement their place in our technologically advanced society, there remains a need to cater to the diverse linguistic landscape, including colloquial forms of low-resource languages. Our study introduces the first-ever comprehensive dataset for intent detection and slot filling in formal Bangla, colloquial Bangla, and Sylheti languages, totaling 984 samples across 10 unique intents. Our analysis reveals the robustness of large language models for tackling downstream tasks with inadequate data. The GPT-3.5 model achieves an impressive F1 score of 0.94 in intent detection and 0.51 in slot filling for colloquial Bangla.

Software has eaten the world with many of the necessities and quality of life services people use requiring software. Therefore, tools that improve the software development experience can have a significant impact on the world such as generating code and test cases, detecting bugs, question and answering, etc. The success of Deep Learning (DL) over the past decade has shown huge advancements in automation across many domains, including Software Development processes. One of the main reasons behind this success is the availability of large datasets such as open-source code available through GitHub or image datasets of mobile Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) with RICO [112] and ReDRAW [267] to be trained on. Therefore, the central research question my dissertation explores is: In what ways can the software development process be improved through leveraging DL techniques on the vast amounts of unstructured software engineering artifacts? We coin the approaches that leverage DL to automate or augment various software development task as Intelligent Software Tools.

As LLMs have become increasingly popular, they have been used in almost every field. But as the application for LLMs expands from generic fields to narrow, focused science domains, there exists an ever-increasing gap in ways to evaluate their efficacy in those fields. For the benchmarks that do exist, a lot of them focus on questions that don't require proper understanding of the subject in question. In this paper, we present NuclearQA, a human-made benchmark of 100 questions to evaluate language models in the nuclear domain, consisting of a varying collection of questions that have been specifically designed by experts to test the abilities of language models. We detail our approach and show how the mix of several types of questions makes our benchmark uniquely capable of evaluating models in the nuclear domain. We also present our own evaluation metric for assessing LLM's performances due to the limitations of existing ones. Our experiments on state-of-the-art models suggest that even the best LLMs perform less than satisfactorily on our benchmark, demonstrating the scientific knowledge gap of existing LLMs.

The race to continually develop ever larger and deeper foundational models is underway. However, techniques like the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) method continue to play a pivotal role in achieving optimal downstream performance. In this work, we establish an approximate parallel between using chain-of-thought and employing a deeper transformer. Building on this insight, we introduce CoTFormer, a transformer variant that employs an implicit CoT-like mechanism to achieve capacity comparable to a deeper model. Our empirical findings demonstrate the effectiveness of CoTFormers, as they significantly outperform larger standard transformers.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are swiftly advancing in architecture and capability, and as they integrate more deeply into complex systems, the urgency to scrutinize their security properties grows. This paper surveys research in the emerging interdisciplinary field of adversarial attacks on LLMs, a subfield of trustworthy ML, combining the perspectives of Natural Language Processing and Security. Prior work has shown that even safety-aligned LLMs (via instruction tuning and reinforcement learning through human feedback) can be susceptible to adversarial attacks, which exploit weaknesses and mislead AI systems, as evidenced by the prevalence of `jailbreak' attacks on models like ChatGPT and Bard. In this survey, we first provide an overview of large language models, describe their safety alignment, and categorize existing research based on various learning structures: textual-only attacks, multi-modal attacks, and additional attack methods specifically targeting complex systems, such as federated learning or multi-agent systems. We also offer comprehensive remarks on works that focus on the fundamental sources of vulnerabilities and potential defenses. To make this field more accessible to newcomers, we present a systematic review of existing works, a structured typology of adversarial attack concepts, and additional resources, including slides for presentations on related topics at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'24).

It is commonly perceived that online fake news and reliable news exhibit stark differences in writing styles, such as the use of sensationalist versus objective language. However, we emphasize that style-related features can also be exploited for style-based attacks. Notably, the rise of powerful Large Language Models (LLMs) has enabled malicious users to mimic the style of trustworthy news outlets at minimal cost. Our analysis reveals that LLM-camouflaged fake news content leads to substantial performance degradation of state-of-the-art text-based detectors (up to 38% decrease in F1 Score), posing a significant challenge for automated detection in online ecosystems. To address this, we introduce SheepDog, a style-agnostic fake news detector robust to news writing styles. SheepDog achieves this adaptability through LLM-empowered news reframing, which customizes each article to match different writing styles using style-oriented reframing prompts. By employing style-agnostic training, SheepDog enhances its resilience to stylistic variations by maximizing prediction consistency across these diverse reframings. Furthermore, SheepDog extracts content-focused veracity attributions from LLMs, where the news content is evaluated against a set of fact-checking rationales. These attributions provide supplementary information and potential interpretability that assist veracity prediction. On three benchmark datasets, empirical results show that SheepDog consistently yields significant improvements over competitive baselines and enhances robustness against LLM-empowered style attacks.

Navigating in unseen environments is crucial for mobile robots. Enhancing them with the ability to follow instructions in natural language will further improve navigation efficiency in unseen cases. However, state-of-the-art (SOTA) vision-and-language navigation (VLN) methods are mainly evaluated in simulation, neglecting the complex and noisy real world. Directly transferring SOTA navigation policies trained in simulation to the real world is challenging due to the visual domain gap and the absence of prior knowledge about unseen environments. In this work, we propose a novel navigation framework to address the VLN task in the real world. Utilizing the powerful foundation models, the proposed framework includes four key components: (1) an LLMs-based instruction parser that converts the language instruction into a sequence of pre-defined macro-action descriptions, (2) an online visual-language mapper that builds a real-time visual-language map to maintain a spatial and semantic understanding of the unseen environment, (3) a language indexing-based localizer that grounds each macro-action description into a waypoint location on the map, and (4) a DD-PPO-based local controller that predicts the action. We evaluate the proposed pipeline on an Interbotix LoCoBot WX250 in an unseen lab environment. Without any fine-tuning, our pipeline significantly outperforms the SOTA VLN baseline in the real world.

The recent advent of powerful Large-Language Models (LLM) provides a new conversational form of inquiry into historical memory (or, training data, in this case). We show that by augmenting such LLMs with vector embeddings from highly specialized academic sources, a conversational methodology can be made accessible to historians and other researchers in the Humanities. Concretely, we evaluate and demonstrate how LLMs have the ability of assisting researchers while they examine a customized corpora of different types of documents, including, but not exclusive to: (1). primary sources, (2). secondary sources written by experts, and (3). the combination of these two. Compared to established search interfaces for digital catalogues, such as metadata and full-text search, we evaluate the richer conversational style of LLMs on the performance of two main types of tasks: (1). question-answering, and (2). extraction and organization of data. We demonstrate that LLMs semantic retrieval and reasoning abilities on problem-specific tasks can be applied to large textual archives that have not been part of the its training data. Therefore, LLMs can be augmented with sources relevant to specific research projects, and can be queried privately by researchers.