Clinical note classification is a common clinical NLP task. However, annotated data-sets are scarse. Prompt-based learning has recently emerged as an effective method to adapt pre-trained models for text classification using only few training examples. A critical component of prompt design is the definition of the template (i.e. prompt text). The effect of template position, however, has been insufficiently investigated. This seems particularly important in the clinical setting, where task-relevant information is usually sparse in clinical notes. In this study we develop a keyword-optimized template insertion method (KOTI) and show how optimizing position can improve performance on several clinical tasks in a zero-shot and few-shot training setting.

Personalization, the ability to tailor a system to individual users, is an essential factor in user experience with natural language processing (NLP) systems. With the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), a key question is how to leverage these models to better personalize user experiences. To personalize a language model's output, a straightforward approach is to incorporate past user data into the language model prompt, but this approach can result in lengthy inputs exceeding limitations on input length and incurring latency and cost issues. Existing approaches tackle such challenges by selectively extracting relevant user data (i.e. selective retrieval) to construct a prompt for downstream tasks. However, retrieval-based methods are limited by potential information loss, lack of more profound user understanding, and cold-start challenges. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel summary-augmented approach by extending retrieval-augmented personalization with task-aware user summaries generated by LLMs. The summaries can be generated and stored offline, enabling real-world systems with runtime constraints like voice assistants to leverage the power of LLMs. Experiments show our method with 75% less of retrieved user data is on-par or outperforms retrieval augmentation on most tasks in the LaMP personalization benchmark. We demonstrate that offline summarization via LLMs and runtime retrieval enables better performance for personalization on a range of tasks under practical constraints.

Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved various aspects of our daily lives. These models have impacted numerous domains, from healthcare to education, enhancing productivity, decision-making processes, and accessibility. As a result, they have influenced and, to some extent, reshaped people's lifestyles. However, the quadratic complexity of attention in transformer architectures poses a challenge when scaling up these models for processing long textual contexts. This issue makes it impractical to train very large models on lengthy texts or use them efficiently during inference. While a recent study by [KMZ23] introduced a technique that replaces the softmax with a polynomial function and polynomial sketching to speed up attention mechanisms, the theoretical understandings of this new approach are not yet well understood. In this paper, we offer a theoretical analysis of the expressive capabilities of polynomial attention. Our study reveals a disparity in the ability of high-degree and low-degree polynomial attention. Specifically, we construct two carefully designed datasets, namely $\mathcal{D}_0$ and $\mathcal{D}_1$, where $\mathcal{D}_1$ includes a feature with a significantly larger value compared to $\mathcal{D}_0$. We demonstrate that with a sufficiently high degree $\beta$, a single-layer polynomial attention network can distinguish between $\mathcal{D}_0$ and $\mathcal{D}_1$. However, with a low degree $\beta$, the network cannot effectively separate the two datasets. This analysis underscores the greater effectiveness of high-degree polynomials in amplifying large values and distinguishing between datasets. Our analysis offers insight into the representational capacity of polynomial attention and provides a rationale for incorporating higher-degree polynomials in attention mechanisms to capture intricate linguistic correlations.

Large Language Models (LLMs) can adapt to new tasks via in-context learning (ICL). ICL is efficient as it does not require any parameter updates to the trained LLM, but only few annotated examples as input for the LLM. In this work, we investigate an active learning approach for ICL, where there is a limited budget for annotating examples. We propose a model-adaptive optimization-free algorithm, termed AdaICL, which identifies examples that the model is uncertain about, and performs semantic diversity-based example selection. Diversity-based sampling improves overall effectiveness, while uncertainty sampling improves budget efficiency and helps the LLM learn new information. Moreover, AdaICL poses its sampling strategy as a Maximum Coverage problem, that dynamically adapts based on the model's feedback and can be approximately solved via greedy algorithms. Extensive experiments on nine datasets and seven LLMs show that AdaICL improves performance by 4.4% accuracy points over SOTA (7.7% relative improvement), is up to 3x more budget-efficient than performing annotations uniformly at random, while it outperforms SOTA with 2x fewer ICL examples.

The CLEF eRisk Laboratory explores solutions to different tasks related to risk detection on the Internet. In the 2023 edition, Task 1 consisted of searching for symptoms of depression, the objective of which was to extract user writings according to their relevance to the BDI Questionnaire symptoms. Task 2 was related to the problem of early detection of pathological gambling risks, where the participants had to detect users at risk as quickly as possible. Finally, Task 3 consisted of estimating the severity levels of signs of eating disorders. Our research group participated in the first two tasks, proposing solutions based on Transformers. For Task 1, we applied different approaches that can be interesting in information retrieval tasks. Two proposals were based on the similarity of contextualized embedding vectors, and the other one was based on prompting, an attractive current technique of machine learning. For Task 2, we proposed three fine-tuned models followed by decision policy according to criteria defined by an early detection framework. One model presented extended vocabulary with important words to the addressed domain. In the last task, we obtained good performances considering the decision-based metrics, ranking-based metrics, and runtime. In this work, we explore different ways to deploy the predictive potential of Transformers in eRisk tasks.

With the rise of Transformers and Large Language Models (LLMs) in Chemistry and Biology, new avenues for the design and understanding of therapeutics have opened up to the scientific community. Protein sequences can be modeled as language and can take advantage of recent advances in LLMs, specifically with the abundance of our access to the protein sequence datasets. In this paper, we developed the GPCR-BERT model for understanding the sequential design of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs are the target of over one-third of FDA-approved pharmaceuticals. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the relationship between amino acid sequence, ligand selectivity, and conformational motifs (such as NPxxY, CWxP, E/DRY). By utilizing the pre-trained protein model (Prot-Bert) and fine-tuning with prediction tasks of variations in the motifs, we were able to shed light on several relationships between residues in the binding pocket and some of the conserved motifs. To achieve this, we took advantage of attention weights, and hidden states of the model that are interpreted to extract the extent of contributions of amino acids in dictating the type of masked ones. The fine-tuned models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting hidden residues within the motifs. In addition, the analysis of embedding was performed over 3D structures to elucidate the higher-order interactions within the conformations of the receptors.

Currently, over a thousand LLMs exist that are multi-purpose and are capable of performing real world tasks, including Q&A, text summarization, content generation, etc. However, accessibility, scale and reliability of free models prevents them from being widely deployed in everyday use cases. To address the first two issues of access and scale, organisations such as HuggingFace have created model repositories where users have uploaded model weights and quantized versions of models trained using different paradigms, as well as model cards describing their training process. While some models report performance on commonly used benchmarks, not all do, and interpreting the real world impact of trading off performance on a benchmark for model deployment cost, is unclear. Here, we show that a herd of open source models can match or exceed the performance of proprietary models via an intelligent router. We show that a Herd of open source models is able to match the accuracy of ChatGPT, despite being composed of models that are effectively 2.5x smaller. We show that in cases where GPT is not able to answer the query, Herd is able to identify a model that can, at least 40% of the time.

With an increasing number of parameters and pre-training data, generative large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities to solve tasks with minimal or no task-related examples. Notably, LLMs have been successfully employed as evaluation metrics in text generation tasks. Within this context, we introduce the Eval4NLP 2023 shared task that asks participants to explore prompting and score extraction for machine translation (MT) and summarization evaluation. Specifically, we propose a novel competition setting in which we select a list of allowed LLMs and disallow fine-tuning to ensure a focus on prompting. We present an overview of participants' approaches and evaluate them on a new reference-free test set spanning three language pairs for MT and a summarization dataset. Notably, despite the task's restrictions, the best-performing systems achieve results on par with or even surpassing recent reference-free metrics developed using larger models, including GEMBA and Comet-Kiwi-XXL. Finally, as a separate track, we perform a small-scale human evaluation of the plausibility of explanations given by the LLMs.

While large language models (LLMs) now excel at code generation, a key aspect of software development is the art of refactoring: consolidating code into libraries of reusable and readable programs. In this paper, we introduce LILO, a neurosymbolic framework that iteratively synthesizes, compresses, and documents code to build libraries tailored to particular problem domains. LILO combines LLM-guided program synthesis with recent algorithmic advances in automated refactoring from Stitch: a symbolic compression system that efficiently identifies optimal lambda abstractions across large code corpora. To make these abstractions interpretable, we introduce an auto-documentation (AutoDoc) procedure that infers natural language names and docstrings based on contextual examples of usage. In addition to improving human readability, we find that AutoDoc boosts performance by helping LILO's synthesizer to interpret and deploy learned abstractions. We evaluate LILO on three inductive program synthesis benchmarks for string editing, scene reasoning, and graphics composition. Compared to existing neural and symbolic methods - including the state-of-the-art library learning algorithm DreamCoder - LILO solves more complex tasks and learns richer libraries that are grounded in linguistic knowledge.

Vision-language pre-training methods, e.g., CLIP, demonstrate an impressive zero-shot performance on visual categorizations with the class proxy from the text embedding of the class name. However, the modality gap between the text and vision space can result in a sub-optimal performance. We theoretically show that the gap cannot be reduced sufficiently by minimizing the contrastive loss in CLIP and the optimal proxy for vision tasks may reside only in the vision space. Therefore, given unlabeled target vision data, we propose to learn the vision proxy directly with the help from the text proxy for zero-shot transfer. Moreover, according to our theoretical analysis, strategies are developed to further refine the pseudo label obtained by the text proxy to facilitate the intra-modal proxy learning (InMaP) for vision. Experiments on extensive downstream tasks confirm the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposal. Concretely, InMaP can obtain the vision proxy within one minute on a single GPU while improving the zero-shot accuracy from $77.02\%$ to $80.21\%$ on ImageNet with ViT-L/14@336 pre-trained by CLIP. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/idstcv/InMaP}.