Discriminative methods focus on modeling the conditional probability of outcome(s) given a context (such as a feature vector). In contrast, generative methods focus on modeling the joint distribution of data. Discriminative models have historically found success in classification and regression tasks in various domains (e.g., finance, healthcare, automotive, etc). On the other hand, newer generative models, such as Large Language Models (LLMs) and diffusion models, have succeeded in open-ended tasks that require versatility and creativity in addition to traditional prediction tasks. We hypothesize that the value of these new generative models is enhanced because they are user-friendly and highly adaptable, making it easier for non-experts to interact with them and produce valuable results with minimal effort. However, this is not the case with current discriminative models. In this work, we explore ways to make discriminative models more user-friendly and adaptable, which we hypothesize will increase their adoption in more applications and bring them on par with the success levels seen with generative AI tools.

Abstract--Medical Vision Language Pretraining (VLP) has recently emerged as a promising solution to the scarcity of labeled data in the medical domain. By leveraging paired/unpaired vision and text datasets through self-supervised learning, models can be trained to acquire vast knowledge and learn robust feature representations. Such pretrained models have the potential to enhance multiple downstream medical tasks simultaneously, reducing the dependency on labeled data. However, despite recent progress and its potential, there is no such comprehensive survey paper that has explored the various aspects and advancements in medical VLP. In this paper, we specifically review existing works through the lens of different pretraining objectives, architectures, downstream evaluation tasks, and datasets utilized for pretraining and downstream tasks. Subsequently, we delve into current challenges in medical VLP, discussing existing and potential solutions, and conclude by highlighting future directions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey focused on medical VLP. Data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone rapid advancement in recent years, bringing transformative changes to various domains, including computer vision and natural language processing [1]-[5]. The availability of large-scale Figure 1: Various aspects of Medical Vision Language Pretraining data has played a pivotal role in driving this progress. With (VLP) discussed in this paper. AI is no longer confined to single-modality systems; instead, these multimodal datasets can play a crucial role in training there has been a notable shift towards multimodal learning [6]- large-scale, generalized AI models. Similar trends are quickly emerging, even within the In recent years, self-supervised learning has become a medical domain [10]-[13]. There is a particular emphasis on Often, medical experts rely on information from multiple vision-language models in both the general domain [9], [20], modalities for diagnostic decision-making. For instance, [21] and the medical domain [22]-[27], given that vision physicians consider various factors, including medical images, and language are two key data modalities. By employing blood test results, and sensor data, to recommend treatments.

We consider the problem of building an assistive robotic system that can help humans in daily household cleanup tasks. Creating such an autonomous system in real-world environments is inherently quite challenging, as a general solution may not suit the preferences of a particular customer. Moreover, such a system consists of multi-objective tasks comprising -- (i) Detection of misplaced objects and prediction of their potentially correct placements, (ii) Fine-grained manipulation for stable object grasping, and (iii) Room-to-room navigation for transferring objects in unseen environments. This work systematically tackles each component and integrates them into a complete object rearrangement pipeline. To validate our proposed system, we conduct multiple experiments on a real robotic platform involving multi-room object transfer, user preference-based placement, and complex pick-and-place tasks. Project page: https://sites.google.com/eng.ucsd.edu/home-robot

Open-world survival games pose significant challenges for AI algorithms due to their multi-tasking, deep exploration, and goal prioritization requirements. Despite reinforcement learning (RL) being popular for solving games, its high sample complexity limits its effectiveness in complex open-world games like Crafter or Minecraft. We propose a novel approach, SPRING, to read the game's original academic paper and use the knowledge learned to reason and play the game through a large language model (LLM). Prompted with the LaTeX source as game context and a description of the agent's current observation, our SPRING framework employs a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with game-related questions as nodes and dependencies as edges. We identify the optimal action to take in the environment by traversing the DAG and calculating LLM responses for each node in topological order, with the LLM's answer to final node directly translating to environment actions. In our experiments, we study the quality of in-context "reasoning" induced by different forms of prompts under the setting of the Crafter open-world environment. Our experiments suggest that LLMs, when prompted with consistent chain-of-thought, have great potential in completing sophisticated high-level trajectories. Quantitatively, SPRING with GPT-4 outperforms all state-of-the-art RL baselines, trained for 1M steps, without any training. Finally, we show the potential of games as a test bed for LLMs.

Bidirectional attention $\unicode{x2013}$ composed of self-attention with positional encodings and the masked language model (MLM) objective $\unicode{x2013}$ has emerged as a key component of modern large language models (LLMs). Despite its empirical success, few studies have examined its statistical underpinnings: What statistical model is bidirectional attention implicitly fitting? What sets it apart from its non-attention predecessors? We explore these questions in this paper. The key observation is that fitting a single-layer single-head bidirectional attention, upon reparameterization, is equivalent to fitting a continuous bag of words (CBOW) model with mixture-of-experts (MoE) weights. Further, bidirectional attention with multiple heads and multiple layers is equivalent to stacked MoEs and a mixture of MoEs, respectively. This statistical viewpoint reveals the distinct use of MoE in bidirectional attention, which aligns with its practical effectiveness in handling heterogeneous data. It also suggests an immediate extension to categorical tabular data, if we view each word location in a sentence as a tabular feature. Across empirical studies, we find that this extension outperforms existing tabular extensions of transformers in out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. Finally, this statistical perspective of bidirectional attention enables us to theoretically characterize when linear word analogies are present in its word embeddings. These analyses show that bidirectional attention can require much stronger assumptions to exhibit linear word analogies than its non-attention predecessors.

Large language models (LLMs) with billions of parameters and pretrained on massive amounts of data are now capable of near or better than state-of-the-art performance in a variety of downstream natural language processing tasks. Neural machine translation (NMT) is one such task that LLMs have been applied to with great success. However, little research has focused on applying LLMs to the more difficult subset of NMT called simultaneous translation (SimulMT), where translation begins before the entire source context is available to the model. In this paper, we address key challenges facing LLMs fine-tuned for SimulMT, validate classical SimulMT concepts and practices in the context of LLMs, explore adapting LLMs that are fine-tuned for NMT to the task of SimulMT, and introduce Simul-LLM, the first open-source fine-tuning and evaluation pipeline development framework for LLMs focused on SimulMT.

In the current era, a multitude of language models has emerged to cater to user inquiries. Notably, the GPT-3.5 Turbo language model has gained substantial attention as the underlying technology for ChatGPT. Leveraging extensive parameters, this model adeptly responds to a wide range of questions. However, due to its reliance on internal knowledge, the accuracy of responses may not be absolute. This article scrutinizes ChatGPT as a Question Answering System (QAS), comparing its performance to other existing QASs. The primary focus is on evaluating ChatGPT's proficiency in extracting responses from provided paragraphs, a core QAS capability. Additionally, performance comparisons are made in scenarios without a surrounding passage. Multiple experiments, exploring response hallucination and considering question complexity, were conducted on ChatGPT. Evaluation employed well-known Question Answering (QA) datasets, including SQuAD, NewsQA, and PersianQuAD, across English and Persian languages. Metrics such as F-score, exact match, and accuracy were employed in the assessment. The study reveals that, while ChatGPT demonstrates competence as a generative model, it is less effective in question answering compared to task-specific models. Providing context improves its performance, and prompt engineering enhances precision, particularly for questions lacking explicit answers in provided paragraphs. ChatGPT excels at simpler factual questions compared to "how" and "why" question types. The evaluation highlights occurrences of hallucinations, where ChatGPT provides responses to questions without available answers in the provided context.

We are introducing SM70, a 70 billion-parameter Large Language Model that is specifically designed for SpassMed's medical devices under the brand name 'JEE1' (pronounced as G1 and means 'Life'). This large language model provides more accurate and safe responses to medical-domain questions. To fine-tune SM70, we used around 800K data entries from the publicly available dataset MedAlpaca. The Llama2 70B open-sourced model served as the foundation for SM70, and we employed the QLoRA technique for fine-tuning. The evaluation is conducted across three benchmark datasets - MEDQA - USMLE, PUBMEDQA, and USMLE - each representing a unique aspect of medical knowledge and reasoning. The performance of SM70 is contrasted with other notable LLMs, including Llama2 70B, Clinical Camel 70 (CC70), GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and Med-Palm, to provide a comparative understanding of its capabilities within the medical domain. Our results indicate that SM70 outperforms several established models in these datasets, showcasing its proficiency in handling a range of medical queries, from fact-based questions derived from PubMed abstracts to complex clinical decision-making scenarios. The robust performance of SM70, particularly in the USMLE and PUBMEDQA datasets, suggests its potential as an effective tool in clinical decision support and medical information retrieval. Despite its promising results, the paper also acknowledges the areas where SM70 lags behind the most advanced model, GPT 4, thereby highlighting the need for further development, especially in tasks demanding extensive medical knowledge and intricate reasoning.

This study investigates the forecasting accuracy of human experts versus Large Language Models (LLMs) in the retail sector, particularly during standard and promotional sales periods. Utilizing a controlled experimental setup with 123 human forecasters and five LLMs, including ChatGPT4, ChatGPT3.5, Bard, Bing, and Llama2, we evaluated forecasting precision through Mean Absolute Percentage Error. Our analysis centered on the effect of the following factors on forecasters performance: the supporting statistical model (baseline and advanced), whether the product was on promotion, and the nature of external impact. The findings indicate that LLMs do not consistently outperform humans in forecasting accuracy and that advanced statistical forecasting models do not uniformly enhance the performance of either human forecasters or LLMs. Both human and LLM forecasters exhibited increased forecasting errors, particularly during promotional periods and under the influence of positive external impacts. Our findings call for careful consideration when integrating LLMs into practical forecasting processes.

Recent developments in balancing the usefulness and safety of Large Language Models (LLMs) have raised a critical question: Are mainstream NLP tasks adequately aligned with safety consideration? Our study, focusing on safety-sensitive documents obtained through adversarial attacks, reveals significant disparities in the safety alignment of various NLP tasks. For instance, LLMs can effectively summarize malicious long documents but often refuse to translate them. This discrepancy highlights a previously unidentified vulnerability: attacks exploiting tasks with weaker safety alignment, like summarization, can potentially compromise the integraty of tasks traditionally deemed more robust, such as translation and question-answering (QA). Moreover, the concurrent use of multiple NLP tasks with lesser safety alignment increases the risk of LLMs inadvertently processing harmful content. We demonstrate these vulnerabilities in various safety-aligned LLMs, particularly Llama2 models and GPT-4, indicating an urgent need for strengthening safety alignments across a broad spectrum of NLP tasks.