The growing popularity of neural machine translation (NMT) and LLMs represented by ChatGPT underscores the need for a deeper understanding of their distinct characteristics and relationships. Such understanding is crucial for language professionals and researchers to make informed decisions and tactful use of these cutting-edge translation technology, but remains underexplored. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating three key questions: (1) the distinguishability of ChatGPT-generated translations from NMT and human translation (HT), (2) the linguistic characteristics of each translation type, and (3) the degree of resemblance between ChatGPT-produced translations and HT or NMT. To achieve these objectives, we employ statistical testing, machine learning algorithms, and multidimensional analysis (MDA) to analyze Spokesperson's Remarks and their translations. After extracting a wide range of linguistic features, supervised classifiers demonstrate high accuracy in distinguishing the three translation types, whereas unsupervised clustering techniques do not yield satisfactory results. Another major finding is that ChatGPT-produced translations exhibit greater similarity with NMT than HT in most MDA dimensions, which is further corroborated by distance computing and visualization. These novel insights shed light on the interrelationships among the three translation types and have implications for the future advancements of NMT and generative AI.

Vaccination is important to minimize the risk and spread of various diseases. In recent years, vaccination has been a key step in countering the COVID-19 pandemic. However, many people are skeptical about the use of vaccines for various reasons, including the politics involved, the potential side effects of vaccines, etc. The goal in this task is to build an effective multi-label classifier to label a social media post (particularly, a tweet) according to the specific concern(s) towards vaccines as expressed by the author of the post. We tried three different models-(a) Supervised BERT-large-uncased, (b) Supervised HateXplain model, and (c) Zero-Shot GPT-3.5 Turbo model. The Supervised BERT-large-uncased model performed best in our case. We achieved a macro-F1 score of 0.66, a Jaccard similarity score of 0.66, and received the sixth rank among other submissions.

Despite the remarkable performance of large language models (LLMs) in recent NLP tasks, their deployment poses substantial challenges due to high computational and memory demands. Recent research has concentrated on improving open-source smaller models through knowledge distillation from LLMs to reduce computational resource costs with promising outcomes. Nevertheless, they frequently fall short of attaining LLM-level performance, particularly in tasks demanding advanced reasoning. In this work, we introduce the \textbf{Mixed Distillation} framework, which capitalizes on the strengths of Program-of-Thought (PoT) and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) capabilities within LLMs and distills these capabilities to smaller models. Regarding these two capabilities, the PoT is dedicated to enhancing the performance of reasoning results generated by smaller models, while CoT simultaneously optimizes the results. Our Mixed Distillation framework offers a promising approach to enhance the capabilities of smaller models, bridging the gap with LLMs, and demonstrating better performance across various tasks. Specifically, on the SVAMP dataset, employing a 7 billion parameter Llama2 and CodeLlama in a mixed distillation framework not only boosts distillation capabilities beyond single-path distillation methods but also outperforms the LLM (GPT-3.5-turbo) in terms of reasoning accuracy. Through sampling in multiple-path reasoning, the models achieve impressive accuracy performances of 85% and 85.5%, respectively, signifying advancements over previous distillation methods.

Large Language Models (LLMs) like BERT have gained significant prominence due to their remarkable performance in various natural language processing tasks. However, they come with substantial computational and memory costs. Additionally, they are essentially black-box models, challenging to explain and interpret. In this article, we propose Optimus BERT Compression and Explainability (OBCE), a methodology to bring explainability to BERT models using persistent homology, aiming to measure the importance of each neuron by studying the topological characteristics of their outputs. As a result, we can compress BERT significantly by reducing the number of parameters (58.47% of the original parameters for BERT Base, 52.3% for BERT Large). We evaluated our methodology on the standard GLUE Benchmark, comparing the results with state-of-the-art techniques and achieving outstanding results. Consequently, our methodology can "whiten" BERT models by providing explainability to its neurons and reducing the model's size, making it more suitable for deployment on resource-constrained devices.

This paper explores preference distillation for large vision language models (LVLMs), improving their ability to generate helpful and faithful responses anchoring the visual context. We first build a vision-language feedback (VLFeedback) dataset utilizing AI annotation. Specifically, responses are generated by models sampled from 12 LVLMs, conditioned on multi-modal instructions sourced from various datasets. We adopt GPT-4V to assess the generated outputs regarding helpfulness, visual faithfulness, and ethical considerations. Furthermore, the preference supervision is distilled into Qwen-VL-Chat through the direct preference optimization (DPO) method. The resulting model Silkie, achieves 6.9% and 9.5% relative improvement on the MME benchmark regarding the perception and cognition capabilities, respectively. Silkie also demonstrates reduced hallucination by setting a new state-of-the-art score of 3.02 on the MMHal-Bench benchmark. Further analysis shows that DPO with our VLFeedback dataset mainly boosts the fine-grained perception and complex cognition abilities of LVLMs, leading to more comprehensive improvements compared to human-annotated preference datasets.

Foundation models, exemplified by GPT technology, are discovering new horizons in artificial intelligence by executing tasks beyond their designers' expectations. While the present generation provides fundamental advances in understanding language and images, the next frontier is video comprehension. Progress in this area must overcome the 1 Tb/s data rate demanded to grasp real-time multidimensional video information. This speed limit lies well beyond the capabilities of the existing generation of hardware, imposing a roadblock to further advances. This work introduces a hardware-accelerated integrated optoelectronic platform for multidimensional video understanding in real-time. The technology platform combines artificial intelligence hardware, processing information optically, with state-of-the-art machine vision networks, resulting in a data processing speed of 1.2 Tb/s with hundreds of frequency bands and megapixel spatial resolution at video rates. Such performance, validated in the AI tasks of video semantic segmentation and object understanding in indoor and aerial applications, surpasses the speed of the closest technologies with similar spectral resolution by three to four orders of magnitude. This platform opens up new avenues for research in real-time AI video understanding of multidimensional visual information, helping the empowerment of future human-machine interactions and cognitive processing developments.

A comprehensive evaluation is critical to assess the capabilities of large multimodal models (LMM). In this study, we evaluate the state-of-the-art LMMs, namely GPT-4V and Gemini, utilizing the VQAonline dataset. VQAonline is an end-to-end authentic VQA dataset sourced from a diverse range of everyday users. Compared previous benchmarks, VQAonline well aligns with real-world tasks. It enables us to effectively evaluate the generality of an LMM, and facilitates a direct comparison with human performance. To comprehensively evaluate GPT-4V and Gemini, we generate seven types of metadata for around 2,000 visual questions, such as image type and the required image processing capabilities. Leveraging this array of metadata, we analyze the zero-shot performance of GPT-4V and Gemini, and identify the most challenging questions for both models.

Beyond 5G networks provide solutions for next-generation communications, especially digital twins networks (DTNs) have gained increasing popularity for bridging physical space and digital space. However, current DTNs networking frameworks pose a number of challenges especially when applied in scenarios that require high communication efficiency and multimodal data processing. First, current DTNs frameworks are unavoidable regarding high resource consumption and communication congestion because of original bit-level communication and high-frequency computation, especially distributed learning-based DTNs. Second, current machine learning models for DTNs are domain-specific (e.g. E-health), making it difficult to handle DT scenarios with multimodal data processing requirements. Last but not least, current security schemes for DTNs, such as blockchain, introduce additional overheads that impair the efficiency of DTNs. To address the above challenges, we propose a large language model (LLM) empowered DTNs networking framework, LLM-Twin. First, we design the mini-giant model collaboration scheme to achieve efficient deployment of LLM in DTNs, since LLM are naturally conducive to processing multimodal data. Then, we design a semantic-level high-efficiency, and secure communication model for DTNs. The feasibility of LLM-Twin is demonstrated by numerical experiments and case studies. To our knowledge, this is the first to propose LLM-based semantic-level digital twin networking framework.

In the realm of public health, vaccination stands as the cornerstone for mitigating disease risks and controlling their proliferation. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted how vaccines play a crucial role in keeping us safe. However the situation involves a mix of perspectives, with skepticism towards vaccines prevailing for various reasons such as political dynamics, apprehensions about side effects, and more. The paper addresses the challenge of comprehensively understanding and categorizing these diverse concerns expressed in the context of vaccination. Our focus is on developing a robust multi-label classifier capable of assigning specific concern labels to tweets based on the articulated apprehensions towards vaccines. To achieve this, we delve into the application of a diverse set of advanced natural language processing techniques and machine learning algorithms including transformer models like BERT, state of the art GPT 3.5, Classifier Chains & traditional methods like SVM, Random Forest, Naive Bayes. We see that the cutting-edge large language model outperforms all other methods in this context.

Generating unit tests is a crucial task in software development, demanding substantial time and effort from programmers. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) introduces a novel avenue for unit test script generation. This research aims to experimentally investigate the effectiveness of LLMs, specifically exemplified by ChatGPT, for generating unit test scripts for Python programs, and how the generated test cases compare with those generated by an existing unit test generator (Pynguin). For experiments, we consider three types of code units: 1) Procedural scripts, 2) Function-based modular code, and 3) Class-based code. The generated test cases are evaluated based on criteria such as coverage, correctness, and readability. Our results show that ChatGPT's performance is comparable with Pynguin in terms of coverage. At the same time, ChatGPT's ability to generate tests is superior to Pynguin, as the latter is not able to generate test cases for Category 1. We also find that about 39% and 28% of assertions generated by ChatGPT for Category 2 and 3, respectively, were incorrect. Our results also show that there is minimal overlap in missed statements between ChatGPT and Pynguin, thus, suggesting that a combination of both tools may enhance unit test generation performance. Finally, prompt engineering improved ChatGPT's performance, achieving an average 28% coverage improvement in Category 2 and 15% improvement in Category 3 after about 4 iterations.