When presented with questions involving visual thinking, humans naturally switch reasoning modalities, often forming mental images or drawing visual aids. Large language models have shown promising results in arithmetic and symbolic reasoning by expressing intermediate reasoning in text as a chain of thought, yet struggle to extend this capability to answer text queries that are easily solved by visual reasoning, even with extensive multimodal pretraining. We introduce a simple method, whiteboard-of-thought prompting, to unlock the visual reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models across modalities. Whiteboard-of-thought prompting provides multimodal large language models with a metaphorical `whiteboard' to draw out reasoning steps as images, then returns these images back to the model for further processing. We find this can be accomplished with no demonstrations or specialized modules, instead leveraging models' existing ability to write code with libraries such as Matplotlib and Turtle. This simple approach shows state-of-the-art results on four difficult natural language tasks that involve visual and spatial reasoning. We identify multiple settings where GPT-4o using chain-of-thought fails dramatically, including more than one where it achieves $0\%$ accuracy, while whiteboard-of-thought enables up to $92\%$ accuracy in these same settings. We present a detailed exploration of where the technique succeeds as well as its sources of error.

The rapid growth in the scale of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to significant computational and memory costs, making model compression techniques such as network pruning increasingly crucial for their efficient deployment. Recent LLMs such as LLaMA2 and Mistral have adopted GLU-based MLP architectures. However, current LLM pruning strategies are primarily based on insights from older LLM architectures, necessitating a reevaluation of these strategies to suit the new architectural characteristics. Contrary to traditional beliefs, we find that outliers play a diminished role in the input projections of GLU-based MLPs. Leveraging this new insight, we propose Dependency-aware Semi-structured Sparsity (DaSS), a novel pruning method for GLU-based LLMs. DaSS balances the flexibility of unstructured pruning and the structural consistency of dependency-based structured pruning by considering both of weight magnitude and corresponding intermediate activation norms in weight pruning metric. Empirical evaluations on the Mistral, Gemma, and LLaMA2 model families demonstrate the consistent effectiveness of DaSS in the prevailing GLU variants.

Despite their success, Large-Language Models (LLMs) still face criticism as their lack of interpretability limits their controllability and reliability. Traditional post-hoc interpretation methods, based on attention and gradient-based analysis, offer limited insight into the model's decision-making processes. In the image field, Concept-based models have emerged as explainable-by-design architectures, employing human-interpretable features as intermediate representations. However, these methods have not been yet adapted to textual data, mainly because they require expensive concept annotations, which are impractical for real-world text data. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing a self-supervised Interpretable Concept Embedding Models (ICEMs). We leverage the generalization abilities of LLMs to predict the concepts labels in a self-supervised way, while we deliver the final predictions with an interpretable function. The results of our experiments show that ICEMs can be trained in a self-supervised way achieving similar performance to fully supervised concept-based models and end-to-end black-box ones. Additionally, we show that our models are (i) interpretable, offering meaningful logical explanations for their predictions; (ii) interactable, allowing humans to modify intermediate predictions through concept interventions; and (iii) controllable, guiding the LLMs' decoding process to follow a required decision-making path.

Persona assignment has become a common strategy for customizing LLM use to particular tasks and contexts. In this study, we explore how perceptions of different nations change when LLMs are assigned specific nationality personas. We assign 193 different nationality personas (e.g., an American person) to four LLMs and examine how the LLM perceptions of countries change. We find that all LLM-persona combinations tend to favor Western European nations, though nation-personas push LLM behaviors to focus more on and view more favorably the nation-persona's own region. Eastern European, Latin American, and African nations are viewed more negatively by different nationality personas. Our study provides insight into how biases and stereotypes are realized within LLMs when adopting different national personas. In line with the "Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights", our findings underscore the critical need for developing mechanisms to ensure LLMs uphold fairness and not over-generalize at a global scale.

Large language models play a crucial role in modern natural language processing technologies. However, their extensive use also introduces potential security risks, such as the possibility of black-box attacks. These attacks can embed hidden malicious features into the model, leading to adverse consequences during its deployment. This paper investigates methods for black-box attacks on large language models with a three-tiered defense mechanism. It analyzes the challenges and significance of these attacks, highlighting their potential implications for language processing system security. Existing attack and defense methods are examined, evaluating their effectiveness and applicability across various scenarios. Special attention is given to the detection algorithm for black-box attacks, identifying hazardous vulnerabilities in language models and retrieving sensitive information. This research presents a methodology for vulnerability detection and the development of defensive strategies against black-box attacks on large language models.

Question answering (QA) over tables and text has gained much popularity over the years. Multi-hop table-text QA requires multiple hops between the table and text, making it a challenging QA task. Although several works have attempted to solve the table-text QA task, most involve training the models and requiring labeled data. In this paper, we have proposed a model - TTQA-RS: A break-down prompting approach for Multi-hop Table-Text Question Answering with Reasoning and Summarization. Our model uses augmented knowledge including table-text summary with decomposed sub-question with answer for a reasoning-based table-text QA. Using open-source language models our model outperformed all existing prompting methods for table-text QA tasks on existing table-text QA datasets like HybridQA and OTT-QA's development set. Our results are comparable with the training-based state-of-the-art models, demonstrating the potential of prompt-based approaches using open-source LLMs. Additionally, by using GPT-4 with LLaMA3-70B, our model achieved state-of-the-art performance for prompting-based methods on multi-hop table-text QA.

CryptoGPT: a 7B model competing with GPT-4 in a specific task -- The Impact of Automatic Annotation and Strategic Fine-Tuning via QLoRAIn this article, we present a method aimed at refining a dedicated LLM of reasonable quality with limited resources in an industrial setting via CryptoGPT. It is an LLM designed for financial news analysis for the cryptocurrency market in real-time. This project was launched in an industrial context. This model allows not only for the classification of financial information but also for providing comprehensive analysis. We refined different LLMs of the same size such as Mistral-7B and LLama-7B using semi-automatic annotation and compared them with various LLMs such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Our goal is to find a balance among several needs: 1. Protecting data (by avoiding their transfer to external servers), 2. Limiting annotation cost and time, 3. Controlling the model's size (to manage deployment costs), and 4. Maintaining better analysis quality.

Large-scale knowledge bases (KBs) like Freebase and Wikidata house millions of structured knowledge. Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) provides a user-friendly way to access these valuable KBs via asking natural language questions. In order to improve the generalization capabilities of KBQA models, extensive research has embraced a retrieve-then-reason framework to retrieve relevant evidence for logical expression generation. These multi-stage efforts prioritize acquiring external sources but overlook the incorporation of new knowledge into their model parameters. In effect, even advanced language models and retrievers have knowledge boundaries, thereby limiting the generalization capabilities of previous KBQA models. Therefore, this paper develops KBLLaMA, which follows a learn-then-reason framework to inject new KB knowledge into a large language model for flexible end-to-end KBQA. At the core of KBLLaMA, we study (1) how to organize new knowledge about KBQA and (2) how to facilitate the learning of the organized knowledge. Extensive experiments on various KBQA generalization tasks showcase the state-of-the-art performance of KBLLaMA. Especially on the general benchmark GrailQA and domain-specific benchmark Bio-chemical, KBLLaMA respectively derives a performance gain of up to 3.8% and 9.8% compared to the baselines.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across a wide variety of tasks. However, they still face challenges with long-horizon planning. To study this, we propose path planning tasks as a platform to evaluate LLMs' ability to navigate long trajectories under geometric constraints. Our proposed benchmark systematically tests path-planning skills in complex settings. Using this, we examined GPT-4's planning abilities using various task representations and prompting approaches. We found that framing prompts as Python code and decomposing long trajectory tasks improve GPT-4's path planning effectiveness. However, while these approaches show some promise toward improving the planning ability of the model, they do not obtain optimal paths and fail at generalizing over extended horizons.

Dialogue-based Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) have significantly advanced adaptive and personalized learning by automating sophisticated human tutoring strategies within interactive dialogues. However, replicating the nuanced patterns of expert human communication remains a challenge in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Recent advancements in NLP, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's GPT-4, offer promising solutions by providing human-like and context-aware responses based on extensive pre-trained knowledge. Motivated by the effectiveness of LLMs in various educational tasks (e.g., content creation and summarization, problem-solving, and automated feedback provision), our study introduces the Socratic Playground for Learning (SPL), a dialogue-based ITS powered by the GPT-4 model, which employs the Socratic teaching method to foster critical thinking among learners. Through extensive prompt engineering, SPL can generate specific learning scenarios and facilitates efficient multi-turn tutoring dialogues. The SPL system aims to enhance personalized and adaptive learning experiences tailored to individual needs, specifically focusing on improving critical thinking skills. Our pilot experimental results from essay writing tasks demonstrate SPL has the potential to improve tutoring interactions and further enhance dialogue-based ITS functionalities. Our study, exemplified by SPL, demonstrates how LLMs enhance dialogue-based ITSs and expand the accessibility and efficacy of educational technologies.