Feed-forward neural networks (FNNs) provide state-of-the-art deep learning regression models for actuarial pricing. FNNs can be seen as extensions of generalized linear models (GLMs), taking covariates as inputs to these FNNs, feature-engineering these covariates through several hidden FNN layers, and then using these feature-engineered covariates as inputs to a GLM. Advantages of FNNs over classical GLMs are that they are able to find functional forms and interactions in the covariates that cannot easily be captured by GLMs, and which typically require the modeler to have specific deeper insights into the data generation process. Since these specific deeper insights are not always readily available, FNNs may support the modeler in finding such structure and insight. Taking inspiration from the recent huge success of large language models (LLMs), the natural question arises whether there are network architectures other than FNNs that share more similarity with LLMs and which can further improve predictive performance of neural networks in actuarial pricing. LLMs are based on the Transformer architecture which has been invented by Vaswani et al. [31]. The Transformer architecture is based on attention layers which are special network modules that allow covariate components to communicate with each other.

Due to scarcity of time-series data annotated with descriptive texts, training a model to generate descriptive texts for time-series data is challenging. In this study, we propose a method to systematically generate domain-independent descriptive texts from time-series data. We identify two distinct approaches for creating pairs of time-series data and descriptive texts: the forward approach and the backward approach. By implementing the novel backward approach, we create the Temporal Automated Captions for Observations (TACO) dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that a contrastive learning based model trained using the TACO dataset is capable of generating descriptive texts for time-series data in novel domains.

Speech quality assessment typically requires evaluating audio from multiple aspects, such as mean opinion score (MOS) and speaker similarity (SIM) etc., which can be challenging to cover using one small model designed for a single task. In this paper, we propose leveraging recently introduced auditory large language models (LLMs) for automatic speech quality assessment. By employing task-specific prompts, auditory LLMs are finetuned to predict MOS, SIM and A/B testing results, which are commonly used for evaluating text-to-speech systems. Additionally, the finetuned auditory LLM is able to generate natural language descriptions assessing aspects like noisiness, distortion, discontinuity, and overall quality, providing more interpretable outputs. Extensive experiments have been performed on the NISQA, BVCC, SOMOS and VoxSim speech quality datasets, using open-source auditory LLMs such as SALMONN, Qwen-Audio, and Qwen2-Audio. For the natural language descriptions task, a commercial model Google Gemini 1.5 Pro is also evaluated. The results demonstrate that auditory LLMs achieve competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art task-specific small models in predicting MOS and SIM, while also delivering promising results in A/B testing and natural language descriptions. Our data processing scripts and finetuned model checkpoints will be released upon acceptance.

We test the robustness of debate as a method of scalable oversight by training models to debate with data generated via self-play. In a long-context reading comprehension task, we find that language model based evaluators answer questions more accurately when judging models optimized to win debates. By contrast, we find no such relationship for consultancy models trained to persuade a judge without an opposing debater present. In quantitative and qualitative comparisons between our debate models and novel consultancy baselines, we find evidence that debate training encourages stronger and more informative arguments, showing promise that it can help provide high-quality supervision for tasks that are difficult to directly evaluate.

This paper proposes a novel prompt engineering technique called Judgment of Thought (JoT) that is specifically tailored for binary logical reasoning tasks. JoT employs three roles$\unicode{x2014}$lawyer, prosecutor, and judge$\unicode{x2014}$to facilitate more reliable and accurate reasoning by the model. In this framework, the judge utilizes a high$\unicode{x2010}$level model, while the lawyer and prosecutor utilize low$\unicode{x2010}$level models. This structure helps the judge better understand the responses from both the lawyer and prosecutor, enabling a more accurate judgment. Experimental results on large language model (LLM) benchmark datasets, such as BigBenchHard and Winogrande, demonstrate that JoT outperforms existing methods, including Chain of Thought (CoT) and Self$\unicode{x2010}$Consistency (SC), in binary logical reasoning tasks. Additionally, in real$\unicode{x2010}$world tasks, such as Fake News Detection and SMS Spam Detection, JoT shows comparable or improved performance compared to existing techniques. JoT significantly enhances the accuracy and reliability of models in binary reasoning tasks and show potential for practical applicability across various domains. Future research should aim to further broaden the applicability of JoT and optimize its implementation for real$\unicode{x2010}$world problem$\unicode{x2010}$solving.

While many online services provide privacy policies for end users to read and understand what personal data are being collected, these documents are often lengthy and complicated. As a result, the vast majority of users do not read them at all, leading to data collection under uninformed consent. Several attempts have been made to make privacy policies more user friendly by summarising them, providing automatic annotations or labels for key sections, or by offering chat interfaces to ask specific questions. With recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), there is an opportunity to develop more effective tools to parse privacy policies and help users make informed decisions. In this paper, we propose an entailment-driven LLM based framework to classify paragraphs of privacy policies into meaningful labels that are easily understood by users. The results demonstrate that our framework outperforms traditional LLM methods, improving the F1 score in average by 11.2%. Additionally, our framework provides inherently explainable and meaningful predictions.

Recent advances in natural language processing and the increased use of large language models have exposed new security vulnerabilities, such as backdoor attacks. Previous backdoor attacks require input manipulation after model distribution to activate the backdoor, posing limitations in real-world applicability. Addressing this gap, we introduce a novel Claim-Guided Backdoor Attack (CGBA), which eliminates the need for such manipulations by utilizing inherent textual claims as triggers. CGBA leverages claim extraction, clustering, and targeted training to trick models to misbehave on targeted claims without affecting their performance on clean data. CGBA demonstrates its effectiveness and stealthiness across various datasets and models, significantly enhancing the feasibility of practical backdoor attacks. Our code and data will be available at https://github.com/PaperCGBA/CGBA.

Recent studies have evaluated the creativity/novelty of large language models (LLMs) primarily from a semantic perspective, using benchmarks from cognitive science. However, accessing the novelty in scholarly publications is a largely unexplored area in evaluating LLMs. In this paper, we introduce a scholarly novelty benchmark (SchNovel) to evaluate LLMs' ability to assess novelty in scholarly papers. SchNovel consists of 15000 pairs of papers across six fields sampled from the arXiv dataset with publication dates spanning 2 to 10 years apart. In each pair, the more recently published paper is assumed to be more novel. Additionally, we propose RAG-Novelty, which simulates the review process taken by human reviewers by leveraging the retrieval of similar papers to assess novelty. Extensive experiments provide insights into the capabilities of different LLMs to assess novelty and demonstrate that RAG-Novelty outperforms recent baseline models.

Recent developments in natural language generation have tremendous implications for healthcare. For instance, state-of-the-art systems could automate the generation of sections in clinical reports to alleviate physician workload and streamline hospital documentation. To explore these applications, we present a shared task consisting of two subtasks: (1) Radiology Report Generation (RRG24) and (2) Discharge Summary Generation ("Discharge Me!"). RRG24 involves generating the 'Findings' and 'Impression' sections of radiology reports given chest X-rays. "Discharge Me!" involves generating the 'Brief Hospital Course' and 'Discharge Instructions' sections of discharge summaries for patients admitted through the emergency department. "Discharge Me!" submissions were subsequently reviewed by a team of clinicians. Both tasks emphasize the goal of reducing clinician burnout and repetitive workloads by generating documentation. We received 201 submissions from across 8 teams for RRG24, and 211 submissions from across 16 teams for "Discharge Me!".

The integration of large language models (LLMs) with robotics has significantly advanced robots' abilities in perception, cognition, and task planning. The use of natural language interfaces offers a unified approach for expressing the capability differences of heterogeneous robots, facilitating communication between them, and enabling seamless task allocation and collaboration. Currently, the utilization of LLMs to achieve decentralized multi-heterogeneous robot collaborative tasks remains an under-explored area of research. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework that utilizes LLMs to achieve decentralized collaboration among multiple heterogeneous robots. Our framework supports three robot categories, mobile robots, manipulation robots, and mobile manipulation robots, working together to complete tasks such as exploration, transportation, and organization. We developed a rich set of textual feedback mechanisms and chain-of-thought (CoT) prompts to enhance task planning efficiency and overall system performance. The mobile manipulation robot can adjust its base position flexibly, ensuring optimal conditions for grasping tasks. The manipulation robot can comprehend task requirements, seek assistance when necessary, and handle objects appropriately. Meanwhile, the mobile robot can explore the environment extensively, map object locations, and communicate this information to the mobile manipulation robot, thus improving task execution efficiency. We evaluated the framework using PyBullet, creating scenarios with three different room layouts and three distinct operational tasks. We tested various LLM models and conducted ablation studies to assess the contributions of different modules. The experimental results confirm the effectiveness and necessity of our proposed framework.