Neurological disorders that affect speech production, such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD), significantly impact the lives of both patients and caregivers, whether through social, psycho-emotional effects or other aspects not yet fully understood. Recent advancements in Large Language Model (LLM) architectures have developed many tools to identify representative features of neurological disorders through spontaneous speech. However, LLMs typically lack interpretability, meaning they do not provide clear and specific reasons for their decisions. Therefore, there is a need for methods capable of identifying the representative features of neurological disorders in speech and explaining clearly why these features are relevant. This paper presents an explainable LLM method, named SLIME (Statistical and Linguistic Insights for Model Explanation), capable of identifying lexical components representative of AD and indicating which components are most important for the LLM's decision. In developing this method, we used an English-language dataset consisting of transcriptions from the Cookie Theft picture description task. The LLM Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) classified the textual descriptions as either AD or control groups. To identify representative lexical features and determine which are most relevant to the model's decision, we used a pipeline involving Integrated Gradients (IG), Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), and statistical analysis. Our method demonstrates that BERT leverages lexical components that reflect a reduction in social references in AD and identifies which further improve the LLM's accuracy. Thus, we provide an explainability tool that enhances confidence in applying LLMs to neurological clinical contexts, particularly in the study of neurodegeneration.

Entity resolution (ER) is the process of determining whether two representations refer to the same real-world entity and plays a crucial role in data curation and data cleaning. Recent studies have introduced the KAER framework, aiming to improve pre-trained language models by augmenting external knowledge. However, identifying and documenting the external knowledge that is being augmented and understanding its contribution to the model's predictions have received little to no attention in the research community. This paper addresses this gap by introducing T-KAER, the Transparency-enhanced Knowledge-Augmented Entity Resolution framework. To enhance transparency, three Transparency-related Questions (T-Qs) have been proposed: T-Q(1): What is the experimental process for matching results based on data inputs? T-Q(2): Which semantic information does KAER augment in the raw data inputs? T-Q(3): Which semantic information of the augmented data inputs influences the predictions? To address the T-Qs, T-KAER is designed to improve transparency by documenting the entity resolution processes in log files. In experiments, a citation dataset is used to demonstrate the transparency components of T-KAER. This demonstration showcases how T-KAER facilitates error analysis from both quantitative and qualitative perspectives, providing evidence on "what" semantic information is augmented and "why" the augmented knowledge influences predictions differently.

This research investigates the classification of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) information within textual disclosures. The aim is to develop and evaluate binary classification models capable of accurately identifying and categorizing E, S and G-related content respectively. The motivation for this research stems from the growing importance of ESG considerations in investment decisions and corporate accountability. Accurate and efficient classification of ESG information is crucial for stakeholders to understand the impact of companies on sustainability and to make informed decisions. The research uses a quantitative approach involving data collection, data preprocessing, and the development of ESG-focused Large Language Models (LLMs) and traditional machine learning (Support Vector Machines, XGBoost) classifiers. Performance evaluation guides iterative refinement until satisfactory metrics are achieved. The research compares traditional machine learning techniques (Support Vector Machines, XGBoost), state-of-the-art language model (FinBERT-ESG) and fine-tuned LLMs like Llama 2, by employing standard Natural Language Processing performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score. A novel fine-tuning method, Qlora, is applied to LLMs, resulting in significant performance improvements across all ESG domains. The research also develops domain-specific fine-tuned models, such as EnvLlama 2-Qlora, SocLlama 2-Qlora, and GovLlama 2-Qlora, which demonstrate impressive results in ESG text classification.

Enabling machines to understand structured visuals like slides and user interfaces is essential for making them accessible to people with disabilities. However, achieving such understanding computationally has required manual data collection and annotation, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To overcome this challenge, we present a method to generate synthetic, structured visuals with target labels using code generation. Our method allows people to create datasets with built-in labels and train models with a small number of human-annotated examples. We demonstrate performance improvements in three tasks for understanding slides and UIs: recognizing visual elements, describing visual content, and classifying visual content types.

Visual language is a system of communication that conveys information through symbols, shapes, and spatial arrangements. Diagrams are a typical example of a visual language depicting complex concepts and their relationships in the form of an image. The symbolic nature of diagrams presents significant challenges for building models capable of understanding them. Yet, recent studies seem to suggest that Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) can even tackle complex reasoning tasks involving diagrams. In this paper, we investigate this phenomenon by developing a comprehensive test suite to evaluate the diagram comprehension capability of LVLMs. Our test suite uses a variety of questions focused on concept entities and their relationships over a set of synthetic as well as real diagrams across several domains to evaluate the recognition and reasoning abilities of models. Our evaluation of three LVLMs (GPT-4V, GPT-4o, and Gemini) shows that while these models can accurately identify and reason about entities, their ability to understand relationships is notably limited. Further testing reveals that the decent performance on diagram understanding largely stems from leveraging their background knowledge as shortcuts to identify and reason about the relational information. Thus, we conclude that LVLMs have a limited capability for genuine diagram understanding, and their impressive performance in diagram reasoning is an illusion emanating from other confounding factors, such as the background knowledge in the models.

Social media posts are frequently identified as a valuable source of open-source intelligence for disaster response, and pre-LLM NLP techniques have been evaluated on datasets of crisis tweets. We assess three commercial large language models (OpenAI GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5-flash-001 and Anthropic Claude-3-5 Sonnet) capabilities in zero-shot classification of short social media posts. In one prompt, the models are asked to perform two classification tasks: 1) identify if the post is informative in a humanitarian context; and 2) rank and provide probabilities for the post in relation to 16 possible humanitarian classes. The posts being classified are from the consolidated crisis tweet dataset, CrisisBench. Results are evaluated using macro, weighted, and binary F1-scores. The informative classification task, generally performed better without extra information, while for the humanitarian label classification providing the event that occurred during which the tweet was mined, resulted in better performance. Further, we found that the models have significantly varying performance by dataset, which raises questions about dataset quality.

This work provides an explanatory view of how LLMs can apply moral reasoning to both criticize and defend sexist language. We assessed eight large language models, all of which demonstrated the capability to provide explanations grounded in varying moral perspectives for both critiquing and endorsing views that reflect sexist assumptions. With both human and automatic evaluation, we show that all eight models produce comprehensible and contextually relevant text, which is helpful in understanding diverse views on how sexism is perceived. Also, through analysis of moral foundations cited by LLMs in their arguments, we uncover the diverse ideological perspectives in models' outputs, with some models aligning more with progressive or conservative views on gender roles and sexism. Based on our observations, we caution against the potential misuse of LLMs to justify sexist language. We also highlight that LLMs can serve as tools for understanding the roots of sexist beliefs and designing well-informed interventions. Given this dual capacity, it is crucial to monitor LLMs and design safety mechanisms for their use in applications that involve sensitive societal topics, such as sexism.

Fusing speech into pre-trained language model (SpeechLM) usually suffers from inefficient encoding of long-form speech and catastrophic forgetting of pre-trained text modality. Leveraging speech-text alignments, our approach segments and compresses speech features to match the granularity of text embeddings. Additionally, we introduce a two-stage training pipeline that includes the distillation and fine-tuning phases to mitigate catastrophic forgetting. In this work, we focus on integrating speech into pre-trained language models (SpeechLMs). A straightforward approach is to transcribe speech into text and use these transcriptions as prompts for large language models (Huang et al., 2023); however, such cascaded systems suffer from error propagation, higher latency, and cannot leverage raw speech information like emotion, speaker identity, and other paralinguistic cues (Faruqui & Hakkani-Tür, 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2024). Speech representations can be integrated into pre-trained language models mainly through two approaches. The first method involves using connector modules that align speech representations with the language model's input space without modifying the model's existing vocabulary. These connector-based techniques typically incorporate a compression module to shorten the speech features, enhancing efficiency.

Probing learned concepts in large language models (LLMs) is crucial for understanding how semantic knowledge is encoded internally. Training linear classifiers on probing tasks is a principle approach to denote the vector of a certain concept in the representation space. However, the single vector identified for a concept varies with both data and training, making it less robust and weakening its effectiveness in real-world applications. To address this challenge, we propose an approach to approximate the subspace representing a specific concept. Built on linear probing classifiers, we extend the concept vectors into Gaussian Concept Subspace (GCS). We demonstrate GCS's effectiveness through measuring its faithfulness and plausibility across multiple LLMs with different sizes and architectures. Additionally, we use representation intervention tasks to showcase its efficacy in real-world applications such as emotion steering. Experimental results indicate that GCS concept vectors have the potential to balance steering performance and maintaining the fluency in natural language generation tasks.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have succeeded considerably in In-Context-Learning (ICL) based summarization. However, saliency is subject to the users' specific preference histories. Hence, we need reliable In-Context Personalization Learning (ICPL) capabilities within such LLMs. For any arbitrary LLM to exhibit ICPL, it needs to have the ability to discern contrast in user profiles. A recent study proposed a measure for degree-of-personalization called EGISES for the first time. EGISES measures a model's responsiveness to user profile differences. However, it cannot test if a model utilizes all three types of cues provided in ICPL prompts: (i) example summaries, (ii) user's reading histories, and (iii) contrast in user profiles. To address this, we propose the iCOPERNICUS framework, a novel In-COntext PERsonalization learNIng sCrUtiny of Summarization capability in LLMs that uses EGISES as a comparative measure. As a case-study, we evaluate 17 state-of-the-art LLMs based on their reported ICL performances and observe that 15 models' ICPL degrades (min: 1.6%; max: 3.6%) when probed with richer prompts, thereby showing lack of true ICPL.