Large language models (LLMs) trained via reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) have achieved breakthroughs on tasks with explicit, automatable verification, such as software programming and mathematical problems. Extending RLVR to electronic design automation (EDA), especially automatically generating hardware description languages (HDLs) like Verilog from natural-language (NL) specifications, however, poses three key challenges: the lack of automated and accurate verification environments, the scarcity of high-quality NL-code pairs, and the prohibitive computation cost of RLVR. To this end, we introduce CodeV-R1, an RLVR framework for training Verilog generation LLMs. First, we develop a rule-based testbench generator that performs robust equivalence checking against golden references. Second, we propose a round-trip data synthesis method that pairs open-source Verilog snippets with LLM-generated NL descriptions, verifies code-NL-code consistency via the generated testbench, and filters out inequivalent examples to yield a high-quality dataset. Third, we employ a two-stage "distillthen-RL" training pipeline: distillation for the cold start of reasoning abilities, followed by adaptive DAPO, our novel RLVR algorithm that can reduce training cost by adaptively adjusting sampling rate. The resulting model, CodeV-R17B, achieves 68.6 % and 72.9 % pass@1 on VerilogEval v2 and RTLLM v1.1, respectively, surpassing prior state-of-the-art by 12 20 %, while even exceeding the performance of 671BDeepSeek-R1 on RTLLM. We have released our model, training code, and dataset to facilitate research in EDA and LLM communities. 1

Pretrained vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have shown promising zero-shot out-of-distribution (OOD) detection capabilities by leveraging semantic similarities between input images and textual labels. However, most existing approaches focus solely on expanding the label space in the text domain, ignoring complementary visual cues that can further enhance discriminative power. In this paper, we introduce DualCnst, a novel framework that integrates text-image dual consistency for improved zero-shot OOD detection. Specifically, we generate synthetic images from both ID and mined OOD textual labels using a text-to-image generative model, and jointly evaluate each test image based on (i) its semantic similarity to class labels and (ii) its visual similarity to the synthesized images. The resulting unified score function effectively combines multimodal information without requiring access to in-distribution images or additional training. We further provide theoretical analysis showing that incorporating multimodal negative labels reduces score variance and improves OOD separability. Extensive experiments across diverse OOD benchmarks demonstrate that DualCnst achieves state-of-theart performance while remaining scalable, data-agnostic, and fully compatible with prior text-only VLM-based methods. The code is publicly available at: https: //github.com/TMLSIAT/DualCnst.

The emergence of agentic recommender systems powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) represents a paradigm shift in personalized recommendations, leveraging LLMs' advanced reasoning and role-playing capabilities to enable autonomous, adaptive decision-making. Unlike traditional recommendation approaches, agentic recommender systems can dynamically gather and interpret user-item interactions from complex environments, generating robust recommendation strategies that generalize across diverse scenarios. However, the field currently lacks standardized evaluation protocols to systematically assess these methods. To address this critical gap, we propose: (1) an interactive textual recommendation simulator incorporating rich user and item metadata and three typical evaluation scenarios (classic, evolvinginterest, and cold-start recommendation tasks); (2) a unified modular framework for developing agentic recommender systems; and (3) the first comprehensive benchmark comparing over 10 classical and agentic recommendation methods. Our findings demonstrate the superiority of agentic systems and establish actionable design guidelines for their core components.

Consider this prompt "Draw a unicorn with two horns". Should large language models (LLMs) recognize that a unicorn has only one horn by definition and ask users for clarifications, or proceed to generate something anyway? We introduce concept incongruence to capture such phenomena where concept boundaries clash with each other, either in user prompts or in model representations, often leading to under-specified or mis-specified behaviors. In this work, we take the first step towards defining and analyzing model behavior under concept incongruence. Focusing on temporal boundaries in the ROLE-PLAY setting, we propose three behavioral metrics--abstention rate, conditional accuracy, and answer rate--to quantify model behavior under incongruence due to the role's death. We show that models fail to abstain after death and suffer from an accuracy drop compared to the NON-ROLE-PLAY setting. Through probing experiments, we identify two main causes: (i) unreliable encoding of the "death" state across different years, leading to unsatisfactory abstention behavior, and (ii) role playing causes shifts in the model's temporal representations, resulting in accuracy drops. We leverage these insights to improve consistency in the model's abstention and answer behaviors. Our findings suggest that concept incongruence leads to unexpected model behaviors and point to future directions on improving model behavior under concept incongruence.1

In studies of transferable learning, scaling laws are obtained for various important foundation models to predict their properties and performance at larger scales. Taking language-vision learning as example, we show here how scaling law derivation can also be used for model and dataset comparison, allowing to decide which procedure is to be preferred for pre-training. Full scaling laws based on dense measurements across a wide span of model and samples seen scales are derived for two important language-vision learning procedures, CLIP and MaMMUT, that use either contrastive only or contrastive and captioning text generative loss. For the first time, we use derived scaling laws to compare both models and three open datasets, DataComp-1.4B,

ARelated Work1 Data Attribution Evaluation: Given recent developments in data attribution methods for LLMs,2 past works in evaluating these methods fall two major categories: leave-out-out and task-based3 evaluation. Leave-one-out evaluation measures the correlation between the data attribution method4 scores and model-retraining, which can also be approximated using linear datamodeling score [26].5 In task-based evaluation, the data attribution method is evaluated based on its application towards6 downstream task, such as noisy label detection, counterfactual evaluation [3, 13].7 Training Data Selection: Selecting high-quality training data selection is important for efficient8 learning in LLMs. Common approaches to data selection relies on heuristic filtering, such as de-9 duplication and lexicon-filtering, [34], or semantic rating [48, 52]. Recent works have applied data10 attribution methods towards data selection in LLMs in both pre-training [56, 59, 15] and post-training11 [45, 53, 31]. These data attribution methods are dynamic and model-aware - increasing the frequency12 of performing selection is one way to take greater account for group influence, where online selection13 at each training step is most fine-grained [49].14 Toxicity/Bias Detection: Detecting and mitigating toxic/biased LLMs outputs is a crucial for safe15 deployment in real-word settings. Existing methods for detecting toxicity/bias in LLMs commonly16 include online API tools 1 [37] or LLM-classifiers [58, 21, 16, 27]. Factual Attribution: Identifying training examples which causes LLMs to generate specific factual20 statements is an important application of data attribution as AI tools are becoming increasingly21 common. Apart from baseline retrieval methods that leverage lexical/semantic similarity like BM2522 [48], Rep Sim [44] and Gecko [33], recent works have explored the use of data attribution in tracing23 factual knowledge in both pre-training[6] and post-training [42, 2].24 We provide below descriptions to the data attribution methods and non-attribution baselines evaluated26 in this work. Note that in our work, we consider non-attribution baselines as methods that do not27 estimate the impact of training samples on models, as detailed in [19].28 Rep-Sim [44]: (Non-attribution baseline) Rep-Sim computes the cosine similarity between last29 token last layer hidden states of training and reference examples. It is more efficient compared with30 gradient-based data attribution methods. BM25 [48]: (Non-attribution baseline) BM25 is a classic information retrieval algorithm that ranks33 training samples by lexical overlap with the query. It is significantly more efficient compared with34 gradient-based data attribution methods.35

Data attribution methods quantify the influence of training data on model outputs and are becoming increasingly relevant for a wide range of LLM research and applications, including dataset curation, model interpretability, data valuation. However, there remain critical gaps in systematic LLM-centric evaluation of data attribution methods. To this end, we introduce DATE-LM (Data Attribution Evaluation in Language Models), a unified benchmark for evaluating data attribution methods through real-world LLM applications.

Large vision-language models (VLLMs) have driven significant progress in multimodal systems, enabling a wide range of applications across domains such as healthcare, education, and content generation. Despite the success, the large-scale datasets used to train these models often contain sensitive or personally identifiable information, raising serious privacy concerns. To audit and better understand such risks, membership inference attacks (MIAs) have become a key tool. However, existing MIAs against VLLMs predominantly assume access to full-model logits, which are typically unavailable in many practical deployments. To facilitate MIAs in a more realistic and restrictive setting, we propose a novel framework: label-only membership inference attacks (LOMIA) targeting pre-trained VLLMs where only the model's top-1 prediction is available. Within this framework, we propose three effective attack methods, all of which exploit the intuition that training samples are more likely to be memorized by the VLLMs, resulting in outputs that exhibit higher semantic alignment and lower perplexity. Our experiments show that our framework surpasses existing label-only attack adaptations for different VLLMs and competes with state-of-the-art logits-based attacks across all metrics on three widely used open-source VLLMs and GPT-4o.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown promising capabilities in reasoning tasks, yet still struggle significantly with complex problems requiring explicit self-reflection and self-correction, especially compared to their unimodal text-based counterparts. Existing reflection methods are simplistic and struggle to generate meaningful, instructive feedback, as the reasoning ability and knowledge limits of pre-trained models are largely fixed during initial training. To overcome these challenges, we propose multimodal Self-Reflection enhanced reasoning with Group Relative Policy Optimization SRPO, a two-stage reflection-aware reinforcement learning (RL) framework explicitly designed to enhance multimodal LLM reasoning. In the first stage, we construct a high-quality, reflection-focused dataset under the guidance of an advanced MLLM, which generates reflections based on initial responses to help the policy model to learn both reasoning and self-reflection. In the second stage, we introduce a novel reward mechanism within the GRPO framework that encourages concise and cognitively meaningful reflection while avoiding redundancy.

Recommender systems are among the most impactful AI applications, interacting with billions of users every day, guiding them to relevant products, services, or information tailored to their preferences. However, the research and development of recommender systems are hindered by existing datasets that fail to capture realistic user behaviors and inconsistent evaluation settings that lead to ambiguous conclusions. This paper introduces the Open Recommendation Benchmark for Reproducible Research with HIdden Tests (ORBIT), a unified benchmark for consistent and realistic evaluation of recommendation models. ORBIT offers a standardized evaluation framework of public datasets with reproducible splits and transparent settings for its public leaderboard. Additionally, ORBIT introduces a new webpage recommendation task, ClueWeb-Reco, featuring web browsing sequences from 87 million public, high-quality webpages. ClueWeb-Reco is a synthetic dataset derived from real, user-consented, and privacy-guaranteed browsing data.