Diversified recommendation has attracted increasing attention from both researchers and practitioners, which can effectively address the homogeneity of recommended items. Existing approaches predominantly aim to infer the diversity of user preferences from observed user feedback. Nonetheless, due to inherent data biases, the observed data may not fully reflect user interests, where underexplored preferences can be overwhelmed or remain unmanifested. Failing to capture these preferences can lead to suboptimal diversity in recommendations. To fill this gap, this work aims to study diversified recommendation from a data-bias perspective.

The efficiency and quality of language model pretraining are largely determined by the way pretraining data are selected. In this paper, we introduce Group-MATES, an efficient group-level data selection approach to optimize the speed-quality frontier of language model pretraining. Specifically, Group-MATES parameterizes costly group-level selection with a relational data influence model. To train this model, we sample training trajectories of the language model and collect oracle data influences alongside. The relational data influence model approximates the oracle data influence by weighting individual influence with relationships among training data. To enable efficient selection with our relational data influence model, we within partition each the cluster dataset independently into small clusters . Experiments using relationship on DCLM weights 400M-4x, and 1B-1x, select data and 3B-1x show that Group-MATES achieves 3.5%-9.4%

Mechanistic interpretability methods summarize a transformer component by a single importance score, conflating two distinct roles: a component may matter because it transports task-relevant content, or because the forward computation degrades when its contribution is removed. We introduce \emph{Interchange-Group Sobol Decomposition} (IGSD), a paired-intervention framework that compares matched activation replacement with zero ablation on the same component, estimates two Sobol-style variance indices, and uses their signed difference to separate the two roles, with intervention validity monitored by a symmetric off-manifold diagnostic $\widehat{\mathrm{ST}}>1$. In factual recall, IGSD identifies an early-layer content channel in both GPT-2 small and Qwen2.5-1.5B that standard importance methods underestimate. A controlled subject and relation donor design shows that the early channel transports relation-frame content while late attention transports subject-retrieval content, refining at head granularity to the known $\mathrm{Attn}_{L9H8}$ head. Late-layer clamping confirms that the early signal is expressed through downstream transformations rather than residual pass-through. These results show that replacement and deletion are not interchangeable controls and their divergence provides a practical statistical diagnostic for content transport in transformer components.

Significant progress has been made in aligning LLMs with target value functions. We argue that, even when an LLM has been well aligned in (post-)training, it may still fail to maximise the aligned value in reasoning. We mathematically formalise this gap as rational value risk: the utility discrepancy between a model's deployed reasoning strategy and its rational counterpart, which is defined to be the responses that maximise expected utility in the steepest direction. The estimation error of rational value risk is further decomposed into three components from finite candidates, finite prompts, and imperfect verifiers. Extensive experiments are conducted, covering models Llama-3.1, Qwen-2.5, T{\"}ulu-3 families (7B-72B), GPT-5.2, GPT-5.5, and DeepSeek-V4, and benchmarks UltraFeedback, AlpacaEval, GSM8K, MATH, HumanEval, and MathArena. The results validate that (1) rational value risk is widespread; (2) value alignment can reduce, but cannot eliminate, it; (3) the risk is highly sensitive to inference-time reasoning strategy; and (4) longer reasoning improves rationality with diminishing returns. The code is at https://github.com/EVIEHub/LLM-Rationality.

Multi-agent debate improves the reliability of large language models (LLMs) through iterative peer critiques. However, fixed topologies often introduce persistent positional biases, amplify unreliable agents, and cause high sensitivity to role assignments. We introduce \textit{Permutation-Equivariant Adaptive Routing Multi-Agent Debate (PEAR)}, an inference-time protocol that dynamically reconfigures communication roles and sparse topologies across consecutive debate rounds. By strategically switching agent-to-role assignments based on evolving agent states, PEAR prevents any agent from permanently occupying a privileged network position or distributes influence more evenly across the debate. We theoretically characterize PEAR as an equivariant sparse router: it preserves accuracy under agent relabeling while reducing routing complexity and improving generalization. Comprehensive empirical evaluations across four reasoning benchmarks and six diverse LLM backbones demonstrate PEAR significantly improves average accuracy over the strongest debate baselines. The code is at https://github.com/EVIEHub/PEAR.

In many modern applications of reinforcement learning (RL), the natural reward for a task of interest is inherently sparse: a reward of 0 is given everywhere except when the task is completed, when a reward of +1 is given. Training a policy to maximize such a sparse reward requires solving a challenging credit assignment problem, leading to slow or ineffective RL improvement. We propose a simple approach to transform a sparse outcome reward into a dense process reward. Our approach relies on training a discriminator to distinguish between previous successful and unsuccessful episodes, and using this discriminator to incentivize the RL-learned policy to match the state-action visitations of successful episodes, while avoiding those of unsuccessful episodes. By incentivizing the policy to match the visitations over all states, not just those that correspond to task success, this reward provides dense feedback on whether progress is being made towards task completion, and, we show, provably achieves this without changing the optimal policy. Focusing on finetuning of robotic control policies, we demonstrate that our approach leads to significantly faster RL finetuning performance on both simulated and real-world manipulation tasks, as compared to simply maximizing the sparse outcome reward.

In open-ended generation, LLMs frequently fall into the "likelihood trap", marked by repetitive degeneration and vocabulary dullness, creating a discrepancy between machine-generated and human-written text. While post-hoc tail truncation (e.g., Top-$p$, Min-$p$) avoids sampling from the unreliable tail, it can over-sample from the uncalibrated head and misalign generation with human lexical preferences; fixed scalar repetition penalties likewise ignore variation in logit scale across inference steps, potentially disrupting semantic coherence. To address both limitations, we propose Variance-Calibrated Modulation (VCM), a training-free pre-decoding intervention that reshapes the probability distribution before truncation through two dynamic mechanisms: (1) Contextual Searchlight via PMI, which suppresses global stopwords while elevating context-evoked tokens, and (2) Adaptive Self-Debiasing, which uses real-time logit standard deviation for scale-invariant penalization. Across open-ended generation, factual QA, and mathematical reasoning, VCM consistently mitigates the likelihood trap. With negligible computational overhead, VCM integrates with existing decoding strategies, improving diversity, coherence, and, particularly at higher decoding temperatures, reasoning accuracy.

Estimating causal effects in industrial time series requires handling temporal dynamics, time-varying treatments, and unobserved confounders. Existing causal foundation models (CausalPFN, CausalFM) operate only on static cross-sectional data; neural temporal methods (CRN, G-Net) require per-dataset training; and concurrent temporal-PFN proposals have not been demonstrated at industrial scale. None output explicit per-pair reliability signals alongside their CATE estimates. We introduce Temporal Causal Prior-Data Fitted Networks (TCPFN), a foundation model for zero-shot temporal causal discovery with learned reliability signals. TCPFN makes four contributions: (1) a Causal Judgment Head that jointly predicts null-effect probability, confounding strength, identifiability, mediation fraction, and causal regime; (2) a mixed training prior covering six causal regimes (independent, direct, confounded, mediated, time-varying confounded, feedback) plus CausalFM-style front-door and instrumental-variable priors; (3) a discrete-token panel-data architecture with cross-attention masking that prevents inter-horizon leakage; (4) zero-shot inference at industrial scale via FAISS-based context selection and one-step posterior correction. On 19 benchmark datasets across five domains, TCPFN achieves competitive zero-shot causal discovery: AUROC 0.96 on Tennessee Eastman, 0.93 on SWaT, 0.98 on Causal Rivers, 0.97 on CAUSRCA. The null detector reaches NullF1 0.94, AUROC 0.99. TCPFN scales to V=1,275 on a proprietary Kraft pulp-and-paper dataset in 6 hours on a single GPU; PCMCI, a CPU-only library, on a V=666 sub-panel of the same data took 81.5 hours, extrapolating by O(V^2) to ~12.5 days at V=1,275. TCPFN's top edges identify cross-subsystem causal relationships while PCMCI's surface within-instrument controller-measurement coupling -- a scalability case study.

AdamW is the de facto optimizer for training large language models (LLMs), yet the theory behind it still lives mostly in finite-variance regimes. This is increasingly unsatisfying, as empirical evidence indicates that stochastic gradient noise in LLM pretraining is typically heavy-tailed. Recent work shows that sign-based optimizers such as Lion and Muon achieve sharp heavy-tailed rates, and that AdaGrad can also converge under heavy-tailed noise. However, no rigorous convergence theory for AdamW has yet been established in this regime. Can AdamW converge under the same heavy-tailed assumptions, or does its second-moment accumulator create a genuine obstruction? We formulate this as an open problem, prove a positive weighted-metric benchmark, and give a corridor lower-bound mechanism showing how denominator memory can hide large gradients.

Agentic LLMs must continuously decide whether newly extracted facts should be added, merged with existing memories, or ignored, yet prior work has focused more on retrieval and storage than on principled write-side control. We frame memory evolution as a novelty-detection problem and propose SAGE, a Spherical Adaptive Gate for memory Evolution that scores candidate facts with a von Mises-Fisher-based density estimator over memory embeddings and routes them with an adaptive threshold that tracks memory-store geometry. SAGE resolves clearly novel facts as ADD, clearly redundant facts as NOOP, and sends only uncertain cases to an LLM merge step, reducing expensive write-time reasoning. On LoCoMo, SAGE achieves the best average token-F1 against Mem0 on all seven open-weight backbone comparisons, while on GPT-4o-mini it reduces add-phase API cost by 3.4$\times$ and add-phase latency by 2.5$\times$ with only a small average judge-score gap. As a drop-in binary gate for A-Mem, SAGE skips roughly 16-18% of LLM calls across five models with minimal quality change on open-weight backbones. These results suggest that novelty-aware write control is a practical lever for improving both memory quality and system efficiency in long-term agentic memory. The source code for our approach is accessible at https://github.com/swang1024/SAGE.