As cutting-edge large language models (LLMs) continue to transform various industries, their fast-growing model size and sequence length have led to memory traffic and capacity challenges. Recently, AMD, Arm, Intel, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Qualcomm have proposed a Microscaling standard (Mx), which augments block floating-point with microexponents to achieve promising perplexity-to-footprint trade-offs. However, the Microscaling suffers from significant perplexity degradation on modern LLMs with less than six bits. This paper profiles modern LLMs and identifies three main challenges of low-bit Microscaling format, i.e., inaccurate tracking of outliers, vacant quantization levels, and wasted binary code. In response, Nanoscaling (NxFP) proposes three techniques, i.e., NanoMantissa, Adaptive Microexponent, and Code Recycling to enable better accuracy and smaller memory footprint than state-of-the-art MxFP. Experimental results on direct-cast inference across various modern LLMs demonstrate that our proposed methods outperform state-of-the-art MxFP by up to 0.64 in perplexity and by up to 30% in accuracy on MMLU benchmarks. Furthermore, NxFP reduces memory footprint by up to 16% while achieving comparable perplexity as MxFP.

Time series data plays a critical role across diverse domains such as healthcare, energy, and finance, where tasks like classification, anomaly detection, and forecasting are essential for informed decision-making. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have gained prominence for their ability to handle complex data and extract meaningful insights. This study investigates whether LLMs are effective for time series data analysis by comparing their performance with non-LLM-based approaches across three tasks: classification, anomaly detection, and forecasting. Through a series of experiments using GPT4TS and autoregressive models, we evaluate their performance on benchmark datasets and assess their accuracy, precision, and ability to generalize. Our findings indicate that while LLM-based methods excel in specific tasks like anomaly detection, their benefits are less pronounced in others, such as forecasting, where simpler models sometimes perform comparably or better. This research highlights the role of LLMs in time series analysis and lays the groundwork for future studies to systematically explore their applications and limitations in handling temporal data.

The frequent discovery of security vulnerabilities in both open-source and proprietary software underscores the urgent need for earlier detection during the development lifecycle. Initiatives such as DARPA's Artificial Intelligence Cyber Challenge (AIxCC) aim to accelerate Automated Vulnerability Detection (AVD), seeking to address this challenge by autonomously analyzing source code to identify vulnerabilities. This paper addresses two primary research questions: (RQ1) How is current AVD research distributed across its core components? (RQ2) What key areas should future research target to bridge the gap in the practical applicability of AVD throughout software development? To answer these questions, we conduct a systematization over 79 AVD articles and 17 empirical studies, analyzing them across five core components: task formulation and granularity, input programming languages and representations, detection approaches and key solutions, evaluation metrics and datasets, and reported performance. Our systematization reveals that the narrow focus of AVD research-mainly on specific tasks and programming languages-limits its practical impact and overlooks broader areas crucial for effective, real-world vulnerability detection. We identify significant challenges, including the need for diversified problem formulations, varied detection granularities, broader language support, better dataset quality, enhanced reproducibility, and increased practical impact. Based on these findings we identify research directions that will enhance the effectiveness and applicability of AVD solutions in software security.

In recent years, we are seeing considerable interest in conversational agents with the rise of large language models (LLMs). Although they offer considerable advantages, LLMs also present significant risks, such as hallucination, which hinder their widespread deployment in industry. Moreover, low-resource languages such as African ones are still underrepresented in these systems limiting their performance in these languages. In this paper, we illustrate a more classical approach based on modular architectures of Task-oriented Dialog Systems (ToDS) offering better control over outputs. We propose a chatbot generation engine based on the Rasa framework and a robust methodology for projecting annotations onto the Wolof language using an in-house machine translation system. After evaluating a generated chatbot trained on the Amazon Massive dataset, our Wolof Intent Classifier performs similarly to the one obtained for French, which is a resource-rich language. We also show that this approach is extensible to other low-resource languages, thanks to the intent classifier's language-agnostic pipeline, simplifying the design of chatbots in these languages.

In natural human-to-human conversations, participants often receive feedback signals from one another based on their follow-up reactions. These reactions can include verbal responses, facial expressions, changes in emotional state, and other non-verbal cues. Similarly, in human-machine interactions, the machine can leverage the user's follow-up utterances as feedback signals to assess whether it has appropriately addressed the user's request. Therefore, we propose using the likelihood of follow-up utterances as rewards to differentiate preferred responses from less favored ones, without relying on human or commercial LLM-based preference annotations. Our proposed reward mechanism, ``Follow-up Likelihood as Reward" (FLR), matches the performance of strong reward models trained on large-scale human or GPT-4 annotated data on 8 pairwise-preference and 4 rating-based benchmarks. Building upon the FLR mechanism, we propose to automatically mine preference data from the online generations of a base policy model. The preference data are subsequently used to boost the helpfulness of the base model through direct alignment from preference (DAP) methods, such as direct preference optimization (DPO). Lastly, we demonstrate that fine-tuning the language model that provides follow-up likelihood with natural language feedback significantly enhances FLR's performance on reward modeling benchmarks and effectiveness in aligning the base policy model's helpfulness.

Counterspeech is a targeted response to counteract and challenge abusive or hateful content. It effectively curbs the spread of hatred and fosters constructive online communication. Previous studies have proposed different strategies for automatically generated counterspeech. Evaluations, however, focus on relevance, surface form, and other shallow linguistic characteristics. This paper investigates the human likeness of AI-generated counterspeech, a critical factor influencing effectiveness. We implement and evaluate several LLM-based generation strategies, and discover that AI-generated and human-written counterspeech can be easily distinguished by both simple classifiers and humans. Further, we reveal differences in linguistic characteristics, politeness, and specificity. The dataset used in this study is publicly available for further research.

This work advocates for the use of sequence level probabilities for quantifying the risk of extraction training data from Large Language Models (LLMs) as they provide much finer-grained information than has been previously obtained. We re-analyze the effects of decoding schemes, model-size, prefix length, partial sequence leakages, and token positions to uncover new insights that have were not possible in prior work due to their choice of metrics. We perform this study on two pre-trained models, LLaMa and OPT, trained on the Common Crawl and Pile respectively. We discover that 1) Extraction rate, the predominant metric used in prior quantification work, underestimates the threat of leakage of training data in randomized LLMs by as much as 2.14X. The insights gained from our analysis show that it is important to look at leakage of training data on a per-sequence basis. There have been several studies documenting leakage of training data from Large Language Models (LLMs), starting with Carlini et al. (2021).

Using supervised automatic summarisation methods requires sufficient corpora that include pairs of documents and their summaries. Similarly to many tasks in natural language processing, most of the datasets available for summarization are in English, posing challenges for developing summarization models in other languages. Thus, in this work, we introduce RoLargeSum, a novel large-scale summarization dataset for the Romanian language crawled from various publicly available news websites from Romania and the Republic of Moldova that were thoroughly cleaned to ensure a high-quality standard. RoLargeSum contains more than 615K news articles, together with their summaries, as well as their headlines, keywords, dialect, and other metadata that we found on the targeted websites. We further evaluated the performance of several BART variants and open-source large language models on RoLargeSum for benchmarking purposes. We manually evaluated the results of the best-performing system to gain insight into the potential pitfalls of this data set and future development.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel at multimodal perception and understanding, yet their tendency to generate hallucinated or inaccurate responses undermines their trustworthiness. Existing methods have largely overlooked the importance of refusal responses as a means of enhancing MLLMs reliability. To bridge this gap, we present the Information Boundary-aware Learning Framework (InBoL), a novel approach that empowers MLLMs to refuse to answer user queries when encountering insufficient information. To the best of our knowledge, InBoL is the first framework that systematically defines the conditions under which refusal is appropriate for MLLMs using the concept of information boundaries proposed in our paper. This framework introduces a comprehensive data generation pipeline and tailored training strategies to improve the model's ability to deliver appropriate refusal responses. To evaluate the trustworthiness of MLLMs, we further propose a user-centric alignment goal along with corresponding metrics. Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in refusal accuracy without noticeably compromising the model's helpfulness, establishing InBoL as a pivotal advancement in building more trustworthy MLLMs.

The growth in prominence of large language models (LLMs) in everyday life can be largely attributed to their generative abilities, yet some of this is also owed to the risks and costs associated with their use. On one front is their tendency to \textit{hallucinate} false or misleading information, limiting their reliability. On another is the increasing focus on the computational limitations associated with traditional self-attention based LLMs, which has brought about new alternatives, in particular recurrent models, meant to overcome them. Yet it remains uncommon to consider these two concerns simultaneously. Do changes in architecture exacerbate/alleviate existing concerns about hallucinations? Do they affect how and where they occur? Through an extensive evaluation, we study how these architecture-based inductive biases affect the propensity to hallucinate. While hallucination remains a general phenomenon not limited to specific architectures, the situations in which they occur and the ease with which specific types of hallucinations can be induced can significantly differ based on the model architecture. These findings highlight the need for better understanding both these problems in conjunction with each other, as well as consider how to design more universal techniques for handling hallucinations.