The goal of conversational product search (CPS) is to develop an intelligent, chat-based shopping assistant that can directly interact with customers to understand shopping intents, ask clarification questions, and find relevant products. However, training such assistants is hindered mainly due to the lack of reliable and large-scale datasets. Prior human-annotated CPS datasets are extremely small in size and lack integration with real-world product search systems. We propose a novel approach, TRACER, which leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate realistic and natural conversations for different shopping domains. TRACER's novelty lies in grounding the generation to dialogue plans, which are product search trajectories predicted from a decision tree model, that guarantees relevant product discovery in the shortest number of search conditions. We also release the first target-oriented CPS dataset Wizard of Shopping (WoS), containing highly natural and coherent conversations (3.6k) from three shopping domains. Finally, we demonstrate the quality and effectiveness of WoS via human evaluations and downstream tasks.

Natural Language Processing (NLP) has become a cornerstone in many critical sectors, including healthcare, finance, and customer relationship management. This is especially true with the development and use of advanced models such as GPT-based architectures and BERT, which are widely used in decision-making processes. However, the black-box nature of these advanced NLP models has created an urgent need for transparency and explainability. This review explores explainable NLP (XNLP) with a focus on its practical deployment and real-world applications, examining its implementation and the challenges faced in domain-specific contexts. The paper underscores the importance of explainability in NLP and provides a comprehensive perspective on how XNLP can be designed to meet the unique demands of various sectors, from healthcare's need for clear insights to finance's emphasis on fraud detection and risk assessment. Additionally, this review aims to bridge the knowledge gap in XNLP literature by offering a domain-specific exploration and discussing underrepresented areas such as real-world applicability, metric evaluation, and the role of human interaction in model assessment. The paper concludes by suggesting future research directions that could enhance the understanding and broader application of XNLP.

Thus, this can lead to inconsistencies in research and policy-making. A common language with standardized To address this issue, the Interdisciplinary Panel definitions is crucial for effective climate on Climate Change (IPCC) and the United Nations discussions. However, concerns exist (UN) maintain the online glossaries IPCC about LLMs misrepresenting climate Glossary (IPCC, 2019a,b, 2018), and UNTERM terms. We compared 300 official IPCC (UN, 2024a). Although LLMs have access to glossary definitions with those generated these repositories during training, they are not by GPT-4o-mini, Llama3.1 8B, and Mistral constrained to them during inference. Therefore, 7B, analyzing adherence, robustness, LLMs could further diversify and confuse these and readability using SBERT sentence embeddings.

IQ testing has served as a foundational methodology for evaluating human cognitive capabilities, deliberately decoupling assessment from linguistic background, language proficiency, or domain-specific knowledge to isolate core competencies in abstraction and reasoning. Yet, artificial intelligence research currently lacks systematic benchmarks to quantify these critical cognitive dimensions in multimodal systems. To address this critical gap, we propose MM-IQ, a comprehensive evaluation framework comprising 2,710 meticulously curated test items spanning 8 distinct reasoning paradigms. Through systematic evaluation of leading open-source and proprietary multimodal models, our benchmark reveals striking limitations: even state-of-the-art architectures achieve only marginally superior performance to random chance (27.49% vs. 25% baseline accuracy). This substantial performance chasm highlights the inadequacy of current multimodal systems in approximating fundamental human reasoning capacities, underscoring the need for paradigm-shifting advancements to bridge this cognitive divide.

The vast majority of real-world patient information resides in unstructured clinical text, and the process of medical abstraction seeks to extract and normalize structured information from this unstructured input. However, traditional medical abstraction methods can require significant manual efforts that can include crafting rules or annotating training labels, limiting scalability. In this paper, we propose UniMedAbstractor (UMA), a zero-shot medical abstraction framework leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) through a modular and customizable prompt template. We refer to our approach as universal abstraction as it can quickly scale to new attributes through its universal prompt template without curating attribute-specific training labels or rules. We evaluate UMA for oncology applications, focusing on fifteen key attributes representing the cancer patient journey, from short-context attributes (e.g., performance status, treatment) to complex long-context attributes requiring longitudinal reasoning (e.g., tumor site, histology, TNM staging). Experiments on real-world data show UMA's strong performance and generalizability. Compared to supervised and heuristic baselines, UMA with GPT-4o achieves on average an absolute 2-point F1/accuracy improvement for both short-context and long-context attribute abstraction. For pathologic T staging, UMA even outperforms the supervised model by 20 points in accuracy.

Event log analysis is an important task that security professionals undertake. Event logs record key information on activities that occur on computing devices, and due to the substantial number of events generated, they consume a large amount of time and resources to analyse. This demanding and repetitive task is also prone to errors. To address these concerns, researchers have developed automated techniques to improve the event log analysis process. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the ability to successfully perform a wide range of tasks that individuals would usually partake in, to high standards, and at a pace and degree of complexity that outperform humans. Due to this, researchers are rapidly investigating the use of LLMs for event log analysis. This includes fine-tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and in-context learning, which affect performance. These works demonstrate good progress, yet there is a need to understand the developing body of knowledge, identify commonalities between works, and identify key challenges and potential solutions to further developments in this domain. This paper aims to survey LLM-based event log analysis techniques, providing readers with an in-depth overview of the domain, gaps identified in previous research, and concluding with potential avenues to explore in future.

With the growing popularity of LLMs among the general public users, privacy-preserving and adversarial robustness have become two pressing demands for LLM-based services, which have largely been pursued separately but rarely jointly. In this paper, to the best of our knowledge, we are among the first attempts towards robust and private LLM inference by tightly integrating two disconnected fields: private inference and prompt ensembling. The former protects users' privacy by encrypting inference data transmitted and processed by LLMs, while the latter enhances adversarial robustness by yielding an aggregated output from multiple prompted LLM responses. Although widely recognized as effective individually, private inference for prompt ensembling together entails new challenges that render the naive combination of existing techniques inefficient. To overcome the hurdles, we propose SecPE, which designs efficient fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) counterparts for the core algorithmic building blocks of prompt ensembling. We conduct extensive experiments on 8 tasks to evaluate the accuracy, robustness, and efficiency of SecPE. The results show that SecPE maintains high clean accuracy and offers better robustness at the expense of merely $2.5\%$ efficiency overhead compared to baseline private inference methods, indicating a satisfactory ``accuracy-robustness-efficiency'' tradeoff. For the efficiency of the encrypted Argmax operation that incurs major slowdown for prompt ensembling, SecPE is 35.4x faster than the state-of-the-art peers, which can be of independent interest beyond this work.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable capabilities across various domains. Accompanying the evolving capabilities and expanding deployment scenarios of LLMs, their deployment challenges escalate due to their sheer scale and the advanced yet complex activation designs prevalent in notable model series, such as Llama, Gemma, and Mistral. These challenges have become particularly pronounced in resource-constrained deployment scenarios, where mitigating inference efficiency bottlenecks is imperative. Among various recent efforts, activation approximation has emerged as a promising avenue for pursuing inference efficiency, sometimes considered indispensable in applications such as private inference. Despite achieving substantial speedups with minimal impact on utility, even appearing sound and practical for real-world deployment, the safety implications of activation approximations remain unclear. In this work, we fill this critical gap in LLM safety by conducting the first systematic safety evaluation of activation approximations. Our safety vetting spans seven sota techniques across three popular categories, revealing consistent safety degradation across ten safety-aligned LLMs.

Large language models (LLMs) process entire input contexts indiscriminately, which is inefficient in cases where the information required to answer a query is localized within the context. We present dynamic context cutoff, a human-inspired method enabling LLMs to self-terminate processing upon acquiring sufficient task-relevant information. Through analysis of model internals, we discover that specific attention heads inherently encode "sufficiency signals" - detectable through lightweight classifiers - that predict when critical information has been processed. This reveals a new efficiency paradigm: models' internal understanding naturally dictates processing needs rather than external compression heuristics. Comprehensive experiments across six QA datasets (up to 40K tokens) with three model families (LLaMA/Qwen/Mistral, 1B0-70B) demonstrate 1.33x average token reduction while improving accuracy by 1.3%. Furthermore, our method demonstrates better performance with the same rate of token reduction compared to other context efficiency methods. Additionally, we observe an emergent scaling phenomenon: while smaller models require require probing for sufficiency detection, larger models exhibit intrinsic self-assessment capabilities through prompting.

Computational cognitive models, which formalize theories of cognition, enable researchers to quantify cognitive processes and arbitrate between competing theories by fitting models to behavioral data. Traditionally, these models are handcrafted, which requires significant domain knowledge, coding expertise, and time investment. Previous work has demonstrated that Large Language Models (LLMs) are adept at pattern recognition in-context, solving complex problems, and generating executable code. In this work, we leverage these abilities to explore the potential of LLMs in automating the generation of cognitive models based on behavioral data. We evaluated the LLM in two different tasks: model identification (relating data to a source model), and model generation (generating the underlying cognitive model). We performed these tasks across two cognitive domains - decision making and learning. In the case of data simulated from canonical cognitive models, we found that the LLM successfully identified and generated the ground truth model. In the case of human data, where behavioral noise and lack of knowledge of the true underlying process pose significant challenges, the LLM generated models that are identical or close to the winning model from cognitive science literature. Our findings suggest that LLMs can have a transformative impact on cognitive modeling. With this project, we aim to contribute to an ongoing effort of automating scientific discovery in cognitive science.