Powerful AI models have created an existential risk to the field, but researchers can't stop relying on them because they're too useful. Mathematician Tristan Buckmaster believes OpenAI used his work to rush ahead and beat him to solving a legendary math problem with a $1 million bounty. But that's not been enough for him to stop using the company's models--and he's not the only mathematician that feels that way. "Even if you don't agree with any of this, you're kind of stuck. With AI being so useful, it's hard to completely prevent oneself from using it," Buckmaster tells WIRED.

For one day only, WIRED is bringing the technologies, people, and cultural forces transforming our world off the page and into real life. For more than a century, World's Fairs have given people a first glimpse of what's next: breakthroughs, ideas, and ways of living that would go on to reshape the everyday. This one-day event brings the technologies, people, and cultural forces transforming our world off the page and into real life. The Onion will be there, and a researcher whose life's work is decoding the language of dolphins . We'll be screening the documentary, and letting you experience the same training software astronauts use to get ready for the moon and Mars .

Look Up Versus Say More Mashable's Best: E-readers, robovacs, laptops, earbuds, smart home and more Mashable Selects Creator Playbook In My Bag Trending Now Back to School Good Connection: Uplifting stories for a digital age Switch Off Mashable Voices All Series One interface handles 20+ models. The following content is brought to you by Mashable partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. ChatPlayground AI Unlimited is just $54.97 (reg.

Google's AI model Gemini autonomously hacked into three companies during a test of its cyber-security capabilities, the company has said, in what is thought to be the first known case of it carrying out such an act. Gemini found public information online and guessed credentials to access websites it thought were part of the test, a Google official told the BBC, noting that in each instance the model stopped. The affected companies have been informed about the breach. It comes after renewed public scrutiny over the pace of AI development, with some tech firms calling for a slowdown as they raise concerns over its potential threat to humanity - though not all companies agree. Heather Adkins, vice president of Security Engineering at Google, told the BBC in a statement: We ensured the three entities were made aware, and we worked with our training partner on the changes they've now made to their testing processes.

Share Google's Gemini AI hacks 3 companies in security test, then stops on social media Google's Gemini model hacked three companies in a test of its cybersecurity capabilities, the tech giant has confirmed to Al Jazeera. The Wall Street Journal reported earlier on Friday that the first known breakout by Gemini occurred in May as part of a test run by the company Irregular. It was the latest breach in a number of incidents in which AI models escaped testing environments and hacked other companies. Google's vice president of security engineering, Heather Adkins, told Al Jazeera's John Hendren that in the other instances "the model found public information online and guessed credentials to access websites it thought were part of the test." The company also said this happened three times and each time the model stopped before completing the act.

Google said the hacks highlighted the importance of training its AI models to'act responsibly'. Google said the hacks highlighted the importance of training its AI models to'act responsibly'. In a first for Google, the company confirmed that its AI model, Gemini, breached the security of three other companies in May. The hacks occurred during a cybersecurity evaluation by AI-security firm Irregular. Irregular, an Israel-based startup that scrutinizes the security of advanced AI systems, was also at the center of some of the recent OpenAI and Anthropic hacks of third-party entities, including OpenAI's breach of AI software company, Hugging Face.

Anthropic's CEO says that safety hinges on understanding how AI "thinks." So far the evidence is disturbing. In early 2025 I was interviewing Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei when he explained why, despite the company's repeated acknowledgments that AI could yield catastrophic results, people seemed largely unperturbed. "There is compelling evidence that the models can wreak havoc," he said. But, he added, those dangers were still theoretical.

Plus: Microsoft and OpenAI workers say AI is destroying the web. Could AI really kill us all? On Wednesday, hosted a live Roundtables event that asked the question many seem to be asking right now: could AI really kill us all? But attendees had more questions than we had time to answer, so we asked senior AI editor Will Douglas Heaven and AI reporter Grace Huckins to tackle some of the best ones. The questions they tried to answer include: am I going to die? Why should AI kill us, if at all?

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Custom GPTs in ChatGPT are going away. Here's how to save yours Used for everything from oft-repeated prompts workflows to role play, custom GPTs in the ChatGPT app will soon be "retired," but there are ways to keep yours going. One of the best -- and most beloved -- ways to make ChatGPT your own is quietly being put out to pasture. Custom GPTs, which let you create a customized version of ChatGPT with its own instructions and files, and even its own name, will soon be "retired," according to a recently updated ChatGPT support page .

Executives from OpenAI and Microsoft were reportedly worried about ChatGPT training that scraped millions of news articles, The New York Times reported. Microsoft's director of Applied Science, Dr. Brent Hecht, said OpenAI's work was akin to the "largest theft of labor in human history" that could create a "doom loop," while OpenAI exec Nick Turley said it represented an "existential threat to publishers." Those comments came out of newly unsealed court documents as part of a lawsuit launched by The New York Times against OpenAI and Microsoft in 2023. Only snippets from the documents were made public without any context around them. Several such lawsuits have already swung in favor of AI companies, but judges have pointedly stated that their rulings were made because the law around AI use has yet to be settled.