When making decisions under uncertainty, individuals often deviate from rational behavior, which can be evaluated across three dimensions: risk preference, probability weighting, and loss aversion. Given the widespread use of large language models (LLMs) in supporting decision-making processes, it is crucial to assess whether their behavior aligns with human norms and ethical expectations or exhibits potential biases. Although several empirical studies have investigated the rationality and social behavior performance of LLMs, their internal decision-making tendencies and capabilities remain inadequately understood. This paper proposes a framework, grounded in behavioral economics theories, to evaluate the decision-making behaviors of LLMs. With a multiple-choice-list experiment, we initially estimate the degree of risk preference, probability weighting, and loss aversion in a context-free setting for three commercial LLMs: ChatGPT-4.0-Turbo,

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in today's tasks of natural language processing. To support applications like multi-turn chats, document understanding, and content generation, models with long context lengths are growing in importance.However, managing long contexts brings substantial challenges due to the expansion of key-value cache (KV cache). Longer KV cache requires larger memory, limiting the batch-size thus decreasing throughput. Also, computing attention over long KV cache incurs more memory access, hurting the end-to-end latency.Prior works find that it is sufficient to use only the recent and high-impact tokens for attention computation, allowing the eviction of less vital tokens to shrink cache size.Nonetheless, we observe a dynamic shift in token importance across different decoding steps. Tokens initially evicted might regain importance after certain decoding steps.To address this, we propose ArkVale, a page-based KV cache manager that can recognize and recall currently important tokens evicted before. We asynchronously copy the filled page into external memory (e.g., CPU memory) as backup and summarize it into a much smaller digest by constructing the bounding-volume of its keys. Before attention computation, we measure all pages' importance based on their digests, recall the important ones, evict the unimportant ones, and select the top-ranked pages for attention computation. Experiment results show that ArkVale performs well on various long context tasks with negligible accuracy loss under 2k$\sim$4k cache budget and can improve decoding latency to $2.2\times$ and batching throughput to $4.6\times$ because it applies attention on only a small subset of pages and reduce per-sample memory usage of KV cache.

Large language models are often ranked according to their level of alignment with human preferences---a model is better than other models if its outputs are more frequently preferred by humans. One of the popular ways to elicit human preferences utilizes pairwise comparisons between the outputs provided by different models to the same inputs. However, since gathering pairwise comparisons by humans is costly and time-consuming, it has become a common practice to gather pairwise comparisons by a strong large language model---a model strongly aligned with human preferences. Surprisingly, practitioners cannot currently measure the uncertainty that any mismatch between human and model preferences may introduce in the constructed rankings. In this work, we develop a statistical framework to bridge this gap. Given a (small) set of pairwise comparisons by humans and a large set of pairwise comparisons by a model, our framework provides a rank-set---a set of possible ranking positions---for each of the models under comparison. Moreover, it guarantees that, with a probability greater than or equal to a user-specified value, the rank-sets cover the true ranking consistent with the distribution of human pairwise preferences asymptotically. Using pairwise comparisons made by humans in the LMSYS Chatbot Arena platform and pairwise comparisons made by three strong large language models, we empirically demonstrate the effectivity of our framework and show that the rank-sets constructed using only pairwise comparisons by the strong large language models are often inconsistent with (the distribution of) human pairwise preferences.

Sequential recommendation systems predict the next interaction item based on users' past interactions, aligning recommendations with individual preferences. Leveraging the strengths of Large Language Models (LLMs) in knowledge comprehension and reasoning, recent approaches are eager to apply LLMs to sequential recommendation. A common paradigm is converting user behavior sequences into instruction data, and fine-tuning the LLM with parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods like Low-Rank Adaption (LoRA). However, the uniform application of LoRA across diverse user behaviors is insufficient to capture individual variability, resulting in negative transfer between disparate sequences.To address these challenges, we propose Instance-wise LoRA (iLoRA). We innovatively treat the sequential recommendation task as a form of multi-task learning, integrating LoRA with the Mixture of Experts (MoE) framework. This approach encourages different experts to capture various aspects of user behavior. Additionally, we introduce a sequence representation guided gate function that generates customized expert participation weights for each user sequence, which allows dynamic parameter adjustment for instance-wise recommendations.

Large Language Model (LLM) inference on Central Processing Units (CPU) is challenging due to the vast quantities of Multiply-Add (MAD) matrix operations in the attention computations.

Human-Oriented Binary Reverse Engineering (HOBRE) lies at the intersection of binary and source code, aiming to lift binary code to human-readable content relevant to source code, thereby bridging the binary-source semantic gap. Recent advancements in uni-modal code model pre-training, particularly in generative Source Code Foundation Models (SCFMs) and binary understanding models, have laid the groundwork for transfer learning applicable to HOBRE. However, existing approaches for HOBRE rely heavily on uni-modal models like SCFMs for supervised fine-tuning or general LLMs for prompting, resulting in sub-optimal performance. Inspired by recent progress in large multi-modal models, we propose that it is possible to harness the strengths of uni-modal code models from both sides to bridge the semantic gap effectively. In this paper, we introduce a novel probe-and-recover framework that incorporates a binary-source encoder-decoder model and black-box LLMs for binary analysis. Our approach leverages the pre-trained knowledge within SCFMs to synthesize relevant, symbol-rich code fragments as context. This additional context enables black-box LLMs to enhance recovery accuracy. We demonstrate significant improvements in zero-shot binary summarization and binary function name recovery, with a 10.3% relative gain in CHRF and a 16.7% relative gain in a GPT4-based metric for summarization, as well as a 6.7% and 7.4% absolute increase in token-level precision and recall for name recovery, respectively.

The predominant paradigm of testing ML models relies on either using only held-out data to compute aggregate evaluation metrics or by assessing the performance on different subgroups. However, such methods operate under the restrictive assumption that the available empirical data is the sole input for testing ML models, disregarding valuable contextual information that could guide model testing. In this paper, we challenge the go-to approach of and introduce (CAT) which uses context as an inductive bias to guide the search for meaningful model failures. We instantiate the first CAT system,, which employs large language models to hypothesize relevant and likely failures, which are evaluated on data using a . Through empirical evaluations in diverse settings, we show that SMART automatically identifies more relevant and impactful failures than alternatives, demonstrating the potential of CAT as a testing paradigm.

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) make remarkable evolutions in language understanding and generation. Following this, various benchmarks for measuring all kinds of capabilities of LLMs have sprung up. In this paper, we challenge the reasoning and understanding abilities of LLMs by proposing a FaLlacy Understanding Benchmark (FLUB) containing cunning texts that are easy for humans to understand but difficult for models to grasp. Specifically, the cunning texts that FLUB focuses on mainly consist of the tricky, humorous, and misleading texts collected from the real internet environment. And we design three tasks with increasing difficulty in the FLUB benchmark to evaluate the fallacy understanding ability of LLMs. Based on FLUB, we investigate the performance of multiple representative and advanced LLMs, reflecting our FLUB is challenging and worthy of more future study. Interesting discoveries and valuable insights are achieved in our extensive experiments and detailed analyses. We hope that our benchmark can encourage the community to improve LLMs' ability to understand fallacies. Our data and codes are available at https://github.com/THUKElab/FLUB.

Compiler backends are tasked with generating executable machine code for processors. With the proliferation of diverse processors, it is imperative for programmers to tailor specific compiler backends to accommodate each one. Meanwhile, compiler backend development is a laborious and time-consuming task, lacking effective automation methods. Although language models have demonstrated strong abilities in code related tasks, the lack of appropriate datasets for compiler backend development limits the application of language models in this field.In this paper, we introduce ComBack, the first public dataset designed for improving compiler backend development capabilities of language models. ComBack includes 178 backends for mainstream compilers and three tasks including statement-level completion, next-statement suggestion and code generation, representing common development scenarios. We conducted experiments by fine-tuning six pre-trained language models with ComBack, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing model accuracy across the three tasks. We further evaluated the top-performing model(CodeT5+) across the three tasks for new targets, comparing its accuracy with conventional methods (Fork-Flow), ChatGPT-3.5-Turbo,

Knowledge distillation (KD) has been shown to be highly effective in guiding a student model with a larger teacher model and achieving practical benefits in improving the computational and memory efficiency for large language models (LLMs). State-of-the-art KD methods for LLMs mostly rely on minimizing explicit metrics measuring the divergence between teacher and student probability predictions. Instead of optimizing these mandatory cloning objectives, we explore an imitation learning strategy for KD of LLMs. In particular, we minimize the imitation gap by matching the action-value moments of the teacher's behavior from both on-and off-policy perspectives. To achieve this moment-matching goal, we propose an adversarial training algorithm to jointly estimate the moment-matching distance and optimize the student policy to minimize it. Results from both task-agnostic instruction-following experiments and task-specific experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method and achieve new state-of-the-art performance.