Long chain-of-thought (LongCoT) has emerged as a powerful reasoning paradigm for enabling large language models (LLMs) to solve complex tasks through a systematic and thorough thinking phase. Although supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on high-quality LongCoT traces has proven effective to activate LongCoT abilities, we find that models trained in this way tend to overfit problem-specific knowledge and heuristics, leading to degraded out-of-distribution performance. To address this issue, we propose a Decoupled LongCoT Fine-Tuning (DLoFT) algorithm, which enables the model to learn generalizable LongCoT reasoning abilities while preventing overfitting to the reasoning content with problem-specific information. The key idea is to decouple the gradient into two orthogonal components: 1) a paradigm-relevant gradient corresponding to the general LongCoT paradigm and 2) a content-relevant gradient reflecting the problem-specific information, where only the former gradient is used to update model parameters. Specifically, by leveraging the unique two-phase composition (thinking and solution) of the LongCoT response, our gradient decoupling mechanism isolates the content-relevant gradient via a projection operation and separates the paradigm-relevant gradient through orthogonalization. Our DLoFT ensures the model concentrate on internalizing the LongCoT paradigm rather than memorizing problem-specific knowledge and heuristics. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our DLoFT significantly improves the generalization behavior of LongCoT abilities compared to SFT while maintaining strong in-distribution performance.

Worldwide image geolocalization--the task of predicting GPS coordinates from images taken anywhere on Earth--poses a fundamental challenge due to the vast diversity in visual content across regions. While recent approaches adopt a twostage pipeline of retrieving candidates and selecting the best match, they typically rely on simplistic similarity heuristics and point-wise supervision, failing to model spatial relationships among candidates. In this paper, we propose GeoRanker, a distance-aware ranking framework that leverages large vision-language models to jointly encode query-candidate interactions and predict geographic proximity. In addition, we introduce a multi-order distance loss that ranks both absolute and relative distances, enabling the model to reason over structured spatial relationships. To support this, we curate GeoRanking, the first dataset explicitly designed for geographic ranking tasks with multimodal candidate information. GeoRanker achieves state-of-the-art results on two well-established benchmarks (IM2GPS3K and YFCC4K), significantly outperforming current best methods. We also release our code, checkpoint, and dataset online2 for ease of reproduction.

While large language model (LLM) agents can effectively use external tools for complex real-world tasks, they require memory systems to leverage historical experiences. Current memory systems enable basic storage and retrieval but lack sophisticated memory organization, despite recent attempts to incorporate graph databases. Moreover, these systems' fixed operations and structures limit their adaptability across diverse tasks. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a novel agentic memory system for LLM agents that can dynamically organize memories in an agentic way. Following the basic principles of the Zettelkasten method, we designed our memory system to create interconnected knowledge networks through dynamic indexing and linking.

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstract and complex phenomena such as'safety' and'robustness' requires strong construct validity, that is, having measures that represent what matters to the phenomenon. With a team of 29 expert reviewers, we conduct a systematic review of 445 LLM benchmarks from leading conferences in natural language processing and machine learning. Across the reviewed articles, we find patterns related to the measured phenomena, tasks, and scoring metrics which undermine the validity of the resulting claims. To address these shortcomings, we provide eight key recommendations and detailed actionable guidance to researchers and practitioners in developing LLM benchmarks.

Despite the remarkable reasoning performance, eliciting the long chain-ofthought (CoT) ability in large language models (LLMs) typically requires costly reinforcement learning or supervised fine-tuning on high-quality distilled data. We investigate the internal mechanisms behind this capability and show that a small set of high-impact activations in the last few layers, greatly govern the long-form reasoning attributes, e.g., output length and self-reflection. Through simply amplifying these activations and adding "wait" tokens, the long CoT ability can be invoked without training, leading to significantly increased self-reflection rate and accuracy. In addition, we also find that the activation changes follow predictable trajectories, i.e., a sharp rise after special tokens and a subsequent exponential decay. Based on these insights, we introduce a general training-free activation control technique. It utilizes a few contrastive examples to identify the relevant activations, and then incorporates simple analytic functions to adjust their values at inference time to elicit long CoTs. Extensive experiments have verified the effectiveness of our methods in efficiently eliciting the long CoT ability of LLMs and improving the performance. Besides, we further propose a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that trains only the last-layer activation amplification module and a few LoRA layers, outperforming LoRA on reasoning benchmarks with much fewer parameters.

LLM-agent systems often decompose high-level objectives into subtask dependency graphs, assuming that each subtask's output is reliable and conditionally independent of others given its parent responses. However, this assumption frequently breaks during execution, as ground-truth responses are inaccessible, leading to inter-agent misalignment--failures caused by inconsistencies and coordination breakdowns among agents [1]. To address this, we propose SEQCV, a dynamic framework for reliable execution under violated conditional independence. SEQCV executes subtasks sequentially, each conditioned on all prior verified responses, and performs consistency checks immediately after agents generate short token sequences. At each checkpoint, a token sequence is accepted only if it represents shared knowledge consistently supported across diverse LLM models; otherwise, it is discarded, triggering recursive subtask decomposition for finer-grained reasoning. Despite its sequential nature, SEQCV avoids repeated corrections on the same misalignment and achieves higher effective throughput than parallel pipelines. Across multiple reasoning and coordination tasks, SEQCV improves accuracy by up to 30% over existing LLM-agent systems.

Variant and gene interpretation are fundamental to personalized medicine and translational biomedicine. However, traditional approaches are manual and labor-intensive. Generative language models (LMs) can facilitate this process, accelerating the translation of fundamental research into clinically-actionable insights. While existing benchmarks have attempted to quantify the capabilities of LMs for interpreting scientific data, these studies focus on narrow tasks that do not translate to real-world research. To meet these challenges, we introduce CGBENCH, a robust benchmark that tests reasoning capabilities of LMs on scientific publications.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable instructionfollowing capabilities across various applications. However, their performance in multilingual settings lacks systematic investigation, with existing evaluations lacking fine-grained constraint analysis across diverse linguistic contexts. We introduce XIFBench, a comprehensive constraint-based benchmark for evaluating multilingual instruction-following abilities of LLMs, comprising 558 instructions with 0-5 additional constraints across five categories (Content, Style, Situation, Format, and Numerical) in six languages spanning different resource levels. To support reliable and consistent cross-lingual evaluation, we implement three methodological innovations: cultural accessibility annotation, constraint-level translation validation, and requirement-based evaluation using English requirements as semantic anchors across languages. Extensive experiments with various LLMs not only quantify performance disparities across resource levels but also provide detailed insights into how language resources, constraint categories, instruction complexity, and cultural specificity influence multilingual instruction-following.

Developing large language models is expensive and involves making decisions with small experiments, typically by evaluating on large, multi-task evaluation suites. In this work, we analyze specific properties which make a benchmark more reliable for such decisions, and interventions to design higher-quality evaluation benchmarks. We introduce two key metrics that show differences in current benchmarks: signal, a benchmark's ability to separate better models from worse models, and noise, a benchmark's sensitivity to random variability between training steps. We demonstrate that benchmarks with a better signal-to-noiseratio are more reliable when making decisions at small scale, and those with less noisehave lower scaling law prediction error. These results suggest that improving signal or noise will lead to more useful benchmarks, so we introduce three interventions designed to directly affect signal or noise.

Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced numerous fields, their training on extensive multimodal datasets introduces significant privacy concerns, prompting the necessity for effective unlearning methods. However, current multimodal unlearning approaches often directly adapt techniques from unimodal contexts, largely overlooking the critical issue of modality alignment, i.e., consistently removing knowledge across both unimodal and multimodal settings. To close this gap, we introduce UMU-Bench, a unified benchmark specifically targeting modality misalignment in multimodal unlearning. UMU-Benchconsists of a meticulously curated dataset featuring 653 individual profiles, each described with both unimodal and multimodal knowledge. Additionally, novel tasks and evaluation metrics focusing on modality alignment are introduced, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of unimodal and multimodal unlearning effectiveness. Through extensive experimentation with state-of-the-art unlearning algorithms on UMU-Bench, we demonstrate prevalent modality misalignment issues in existing methods. These findings underscore the critical need for novel multimodal unlearning approaches explicitly considering modality alignment.