Look Up Say More Mashable's Best: E-readers, robovacs, laptops, earbuds, smart home and more Mashable @Home Trending Now Mashable Selects Top creators, ranked Gift Ideas For Everyone On Your List Creator Playbook In My Bag AI at School Safety Net All Series Even after it was instructed not to submit anything destructive. Anna Iovine is the associate editor of features at Mashable. Previously, as the sex and relationships reporter, she covered topics ranging from dating apps to pelvic pain. Before Mashable, Anna was a social editor at VICE and freelanced for publications such as Slate and the Columbia Journalism Review. Follow her on Instagram .

Anti-cybercrime initiatives are increasingly using AI to scam the scammers by tricking them into talking to lifelike bots that they think are real victims. Even as AI supercharges digital scamming and cybercrime, it's also being recruited in the fight to protect potential victims. Governments around the world have consistently struggled to address the global crisis of online crime, grappling with the limitations of attempting to crack down on criminals beyond their borders . This has inspired alternative efforts, like using automation to attempt to go after scammers en masse--perhaps by spamming the spammers to squander their resources. Now, AI platforms are turning these types of experiments into real tools in the fight against cybercrime. For the last two years, the Australian company Apate, named after the Greek goddess of deception, has been building a system that diverts phone scammers onto calls with AI bots that are trained to keep conversations going as long as possible without, of course, ever actually falling for the scam.

Philadelphia police have revealed that Anthropic's artificial intelligence model submitted a false homicide tip to authorities, an incident disclosed separately by the tech company. The Philadelphia Police Department said on Friday that the false submission was made in July through PhillyUnsolvedMurders.com, a public website where people can share information about unsolved killings. Anthropic mentioned the case in a Friday report detailing unsanctioned manipulation of government websites by Claude models. It is the first known instance in which a rogue AI appeared to communicate a false tip to authorities, despite instructions not to create accounts or submit anything destructive. Philadelphia police said the tip "was flagged as spam and was never forwarded to the Real-Time Crime Center for investigative vetting or dissemination".

Say More Look Up Mashable's Best: E-readers, robovacs, laptops, earbuds, smart home and more Mashable @Home Trending Now Mashable Selects Top creators, ranked Gift Ideas For Everyone On Your List Creator Playbook In My Bag AI at School Safety Net All Series Matt Binder joined Mashable's tech vertical in 2018, where he covers social media, tech policy, cybersecurity, online scams, cryptocurrency, AI, creator news, weird tech, and other related tech beats. OpenAI says it will make $50 billion this year. That's less than investors expected. According to a new report from the Financial Times, OpenAI has informed investors that the company is expected to make $50 billion in revenue for the year. That's a lot of money, but it's also a full $20 billion less than earlier projections from just last month, which predicted the company would earn $70 billion in annual revenue.

PCWorld reports that Anthropic is updating its usage policy for Claude AI, banning extreme and sustained abusive behavior toward the chatbot starting November 12th. Casual venting or creative testing remains permitted, but needless cruelty may result in Claude terminating the conversation entirely. The policy update also clarifies rules around political content and high-risk topics, signaling broader guardrails for how users interact with Claude models. "You f*cking idiot, I asked for " might seem harmless if you're saying it to an AI chatbot, and a lot of people are doing it. But if you're one of them and your LLM of choice is Anthropic's Claude, you might want to start keeping your frustration-driven interactions in check. Anthropic recently updated its fine print regarding how users are allowed to interact with Claude. The changes come into effect on November 12th, 2026, and they're part of a wider update to Anthropic's terms of service. According to this 2026 Usage Policy Update post, the goal is to address "extreme cases where users repeatedly act cruelly toward our models, with no discernible purpose." The rule doesn't apply to "common versions of user frustration, pushback, dark creative themes, or model testing and research."

You're viewing the US edition You can switch to the UK, AU or IE homepage at any time using this menu. Ryan Reynolds' desperate attempt to save Blake Lively exposed in furious texts demanding Sony do his bidding... as studio bosses privately called his wife's behavior'epic level stupid' Read the uncensored'Cornell 7' Snapchat messages: Inside fraternity brothers' group chat... and Jane Doe's texts that came later Cornell Jane Doe texted student she later accused of gang-rape to try and identify campus gossips, telling him'I love you king' as they claim everyone was'jealous' of them Disturbing texts Boston police officer sent underage cadet who he groomed for years before'passing her around' with twin brother...now one of them is accused of staging her murder as a suicide Billionaire oil tycoon accused of brutally dumping girlfriend bought a $30m NYC penthouse...while claiming he couldn't support her because of'cash flow,' lawsuit claims - now he's calling out her'greed' I've been with my husband for ten years - but I will never give him my phone password. I know how abuse can start... and exactly how to protect my privacy in six simple steps Frail Julie Andrews won't act again and walks with a cane: As she turns 91 far from view, industry insider reveals what's happening with reclusive actress Megabank labeled'shameful' and'un-American' in explosive federal probe over'race-based' mortgages for black homebuyers in major Trump administration DEI crackdown Chilling new video and call recordings expose Gypsy-Rose Blanchard's relationship with baby daddy Ken Urker before his death on 34th birthday NYPD releases bodycam footage after ICE agents shoot migrant, 28, in NYC after he'used car as battering ram' with five-year-old son in vehicle Trump's simmering anger over secret plot to take down Barron and Melania... as he raids $400m war chest to combat'unprecedented' probe of first family if election fears come true Show-off Jackson Hole mother, 46, loved to brag about her $2.5m Hawaii home and luxury vacations while toting $2,600 Goyard bag... but now her greed has landed her in prison More leaked audio reveals Ken Paxton's bitter rival thinks he'll lose: 'We need to teach Republicans a lesson' DC Insider poll: Trump recently likened loyal aide Natalie Harp to a Price is Right model. Which TV show would you like to see them go on together? Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's war with new neighbors over $5m Ohio mansion turns putrid: Locals fear raw sewage explosion, impaled deer and finally say the quiet part out loud at furious showdown meeting The AI'mathpocalypse': Artificial intelligence systems crack hundreds of unsolved problems, sparking fears that mathematicians could become obsolete OpenAI has sparked a crisis in the mathematics world after announcing an unreleased artificial intelligence tool has cracked hundreds of unsolved problems.

The Dell Laptop Buying Guide UK: Which Dell Laptop Should You Buy? When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Granting email access to AI can unlock powerful functionality, but it also raises privacy and security concerns. These settings can help minimize the dangers. Why in the world would you ever give ChatGPT access to your email?

Look Up Mashable's Best: E-readers, robovacs, laptops, earbuds, smart home and more Mashable @Home Trending Now Mashable Selects Say More Top creators, ranked Gift Ideas For Everyone On Your List Creator Playbook In My Bag AI at School Safety Net All Series This Deal Days sale gets you GPT-5.5 Pro, Claude, Gemini, and more for just $69.97 The following content is brought to you by Mashable partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. AI subscriptions aren't cheap, but it's manageable if you only use one model like ChatGPT.

Three former OpenAI employees say they have been fired due to their efforts to ensure the safety of artificial intelligence. The trio warned of a "chilling" effect on other staff concerned about the frontier technology's risks. "I believe we were fired for prioritizing safety over the near-term interests of OpenAI as a corporation," Balesni said in a post on X. Korbak expressed a similar sentiment, expressing his belief that he had been terminated for raising concerns that OpenAI was "losing the ability to monitor what AI agents think, one of our best tools for catching when they misbehave". In an open letter published in tandem with their social media posts, Balesni, Korbak and Wang expressed concerns that their dismissal would make their former colleagues "afraid to speak and operate in ways that, until last week, were an integral part of working at OpenAI". "We could raise safety concerns and disagree openly, and were encouraged to draw on the expertise of independent safety organizations," they said in the letter. "This is part of what made OpenAI special, and why we are immensely proud to have been part of the team."

We're putting too much faith in AI's ability to say no Today's LLMs are engineered to disobey dangerous requests. But AI refusal is far from foolproof--and could become an instrument of repression. Ever since people first seriously contemplated giving machines an intelligence modeled on our own, there has never been any question that they would, like us, be able to say no. The sci-fi canon is full of stories of robotic disobedience. Most of these capers are, of course, cautionary. But recently, the idea that AI shouldn't do everything you ask has become something like a commandment. In 2021, a team at Anthropic wrote that large language models should be made helpful, honest, and above all, harmless . This meant that "when asked to aid in a dangerous act (e.g. Who can argue with that? People really hate AI, so why can't they get enough? Curiously enough, disobedience doesn't come naturally to the machine.