Anthropic has usurped OpenAI as the world's most valuable artificial intelligence startup, soaring to a $965bn valuation ahead of expected public listings by the rival firms. Anthropic, the maker of the Claude family of chatbots, said on Thursday that it had raised $65bn from private investors after a fundraising round led by Altimeter Capital, Greenoaks, Dragoneer and Sequoia Capital. "This funding will help us serve the historic demand we are experiencing, stay at the research frontier, and bring Claude to more of the places where work happens," Anthropic's Chief Financial Officer Krishna Rao said in a statement. Altimeter Capital CEO Brad Gerstner hailed the adoption of Claude among the "world's most demanding organisations" as evidence of Anthropic's command in the field. "This momentum positions Anthropic to lead the next phase of AI innovation and capture the enormous opportunity ahead," Gerstner said.

Conformal prediction (CP) and its extension, conformal risk control (CRC), are established frameworks for quantifying uncertainty in supervised machine learning through formal guarantees. However, recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) have been driven by unsupervised generative models, such as large language models (LLMs) and image generators, which are not directly compatible with CP or CRC. In this work we introduce conformal generation (Conf-Gen), a general framework adapting CRC to generative tasks while relaxing its theoretical assumptions. Conf-Gen unifies and generalizes previous attempts to apply CP to LLMs, and extends conformal methodology to entirely new domains. We demonstrate the flexibility of Conf-Gen through some novel applications, including obtaining conformal guarantees on: image generators producing non-memorized images, conversational AI systems having asked enough clarifying questions, and the output of AI agents being correct.

Federated Conformal RAG (FC-RAG) provides distribution-free coverage for a bandwidth-limited swarm of weak language models, but only at a fixed horizon. We extend it to anytime-valid sequential coverage: validity at every stopping time, preserved under predictable adaptive control (recalibration, per-node bandwidth escalation, distilled-student refresh), at no extra cost in assumptions over fixed-horizon FC-RAG. Naive composition fails because FC-RAG's marginal coverage bound makes the betting e-process a non-supermartingale on adverse calibration draws, and Ville's inequality cannot be invoked. We give Anytime-FC-RAG, a sequential extension built on a summable per-step calibration-deviation budget that converts the marginal bound into a strict conditional bound on a calibration-good event, paired with a truncated betting e-process that is a nonnegative supermartingale on the entire probability space. From these two ingredients, we obtain four guarantees: time-uniform alarm validity $\mathbb{P}(\sup_t E_t \ge 1/δ_e) \le δ_e + δ_{\mathrm{cal}}$, a Hoeffding-stitched cumulative-miscoverage envelope at the same total budget, safety under any predictable controller (recalibration, bandwidth escalation, student refresh), and training-side error propagation across an unbounded sequence of Federated Probe-Logit Distillation (FPLD) refreshes via a summable training budget. As a practical consequence, an adaptive controller that escalates retrieval bandwidth only when the e-process crosses a warning threshold matches the alarm rate of a fixed-high-bandwidth schedule at substantially lower communication cost. Experiments on a GPT-2-small + MiniLM swarm across MMLU, DBpedia, and AG News verify the predicted alarm rate, detection delay, envelope coverage, and $14$-$57\%$ bandwidth savings; the alarm fires when and only when coverage genuinely breaks.

The scaling exponent $α$ in neural scaling laws $L(N) \propto N^{-α}$ is commonly treated as a fixed constant set by architecture and data. We present evidence that $α$ depends systematically on the optimizer. In controlled random-feature regression experiments -- the canonical theoretical framework for neural scaling -- we measure $α$ across five optimizer variants and six spectral conditions. Preconditioned optimizers consistently yield steeper scaling (larger $α$), with the $α$-shift increasing across most of the tested spectral range, peaking near $s = 1.5$, and remaining large at $s = 2.0$. At $s \approx 1.0$ (characteristic of natural language), the full natural gradient achieves $α\approx 0.31$ versus $α\approx 0.12$ for gradient descent -- a $2.6\times$ larger fitted exponent that, within the random-feature model, compounds with each model-size doubling. Whether and how this exponent shift transfers to large-scale LLM training -- where recent evidence suggests the advantage may attenuate with scale -- remains an important open question. Our results imply that scaling-law forecasts should account for optimizer choice, and we provide a spectral diagnostic predicting when advanced optimizers will pay off.

Pairwise human-preference platforms such as Chatbot Arena have become central to large language model (LLM) evaluation, yet reliable task-specific ranking remains challenging. Global leaderboards mask task heterogeneity, while ranking each fine-grained task independently is unstable under sparse, imbalanced comparisons. We propose a low-rank framework for task-specific LLM ranking from sparse pairwise comparisons, modeling the task-by-model ability matrix $Θ^\star \in \mathbb{R}^{d_t \times d_m}$ as low rank so that information is shared across related tasks while task-specific differences are preserved. We first develop a max-norm ($\ell_\infty$) accurate estimator for the latent scores, combining a convex initializer with alternating-minimization refinement, and prove task-wise top-$K$ recovery guarantees under sparse sampling. Our main contribution is an uncertainty quantification framework for task-specific ranking. We construct cross-fitted one-step debiased estimators for fixed score contrasts -- such as the task-specific ability gap between two models -- yielding asymptotically valid confidence intervals that attain the semiparametric efficiency bound. We then extend the inference to the high-dimensional ranking regime, where per-task ranks and top-$K$ membership are determined by many dependent score-gap hypotheses. Using Gaussian and multiplier-bootstrap calibration, we obtain simultaneous confidence sets for per-task ranks and valid top-$K$ membership tests across many tasks and models. Experiments on synthetic data and Chatbot Arena show that low-rank sharing improves sample efficiency over independent task-wise Bradley-Terry estimation and produces tighter, better-calibrated ranking certificates, with the largest gains in the sparse regime typical of real LLM benchmarks.

Many applications require statistically valid inference across many related "tasks", while using only a handful of high-quality labels per hypothesis. In AI evaluation, these tasks may correspond to model behaviors across prompts, subgroups, or hypotheses; in social science surveys, they may correspond to related questions, populations, or measurement conditions. Prediction-powered inference (PPI) uses abundant but inexpensive proxy measurements to improve inference from limited, "ground-truth" labels, but commonly used methods treat tasks independently and therefore fail to exploit shared structure across related tasks. This limitation is especially important in settings where only a small number of labels are available per task. To address this issue, we introduce a multi-task prediction-powered inference framework that uses labeled data from related tasks to improve power while preserving task-specific inference. Our methods exploit the shared structure in the proxy-ground-truth relationship through cross-task recalibration, while retaining within-task rectification and power tuning to construct accurate point estimates and confidence intervals. We prove that efficiency gains beyond power-tuned PPI are only possible when the proxy-ground-truth relationship contains nonlinear structure; affine cross-task recalibrations are asymptotically equivalent to using the original proxy. We complement our theoretical findings with experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets, as well as a case study auditing language models on election-related information during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Using a large human-annotation study, we show that cross-task recalibration can substantially reduce confidence interval widths when labels are scarce.

Language model reasoning traces are rarely all-or-nothing; they frequently contain valid intermediate steps before a critical error occurs. Existing uncertainty quantification methods typically certify final answers or entire responses, failing to provide statistical guarantees for the proportion of a sequential trace that can be safely retained. To address this, we introduce CROP (Conformal Reasoning Output Prefixes), a verifier-agnostic calibration procedure for clean-prefix certification. Given any step-level risk proxy, CROP selects a calibrated threshold and returns the longest contiguous prefix whose step risk proxies remain below it, routing the uncertified suffix for downstream review or repair. Assuming exchangeability, CROP rigorously controls the marginal probability that the returned prefix contains an annotated error. Across six process-labeled reasoning datasets, we demonstrate that standard step-level metrics such as AUROC do not fully capture prefix utility, suggesting verifiers should instead be evaluated by certified prefix length. Furthermore, CROP balances over- and under-withholding, improving downstream repair accuracy by preserving valid intermediate reasoning while discarding misleading suffixes. Ultimately, this work positions prefix certification as a rigorous, practical bridge between process supervision, abstention, and repair.

Modern learning systems excel at interpolation but struggle to generalize to unseen tasks outside the training distribution's support. This failure occurs even in simple settings, such as handling task parameters beyond the training range, and persists despite advances in foundation models. To this end, we develop the Relational Task Extrapolator (RTE), an algorithm designed to enable systematic extrapolation to novel tasks. The key observation is that extrapolation is inherently relational: extrapolating to unseen tasks requires learning how tasks transform into one another. If a model learns the transformation between tasks A and B during training, it can apply that same transformation to relate known tasks to unseen ones at test time. RTE operationalizes this idea by decomposing each target task into a known anchor task and a transformation linking the anchor and target. It then learns a relational operator, mapping an anchor-transformation pair to predictions for the target task. We instantiate RTE across multiple task extrapolation regimes in function prediction, e.g. where target tasks use out-of-range parameters (parameter extrapolation), have greater compositional depth (length extrapolation), and/or recombine function primitives in unseen ways (compositional extrapolation). We further extend RTE to sequence prediction, integrating it into fine-tuning algorithms for foundation models. Across empirical studies, we find that RTE substantially outperforms existing approaches on extrapolation to novel, unseen tasks.

Numeric tabular datasets are the dominant data format in scientific practice, yet large language models lack native mechanisms for representing numeric datasets in a meaningful way across heterogeneous feature spaces. Existing approaches either target predictive modeling over individual datasets, which requires a shared set of variable definitions, or lack mechanisms for interpretable cross-dataset alignment. The proposed methodology characterizes numeric tabular datasets through structured exploratory data analysis descriptors, embeds those descriptors into a shared vector space using a pretrained sentence transformer, and quantifies cross-dataset similarity via Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA). Furthermore, a penalized formulation of CCA is applied to recover sparse, interpretable variable-level correspondences between datasets, identifying which statistical descriptors or variable-level quantities drive cross-dataset alignment without requiring shared variable names or feature conventions. Differential privacy is optionally applied to the descriptor set prior to embedding, supporting deployment in sensitive data contexts without requiring access to raw observations at time of comparison. The methodology is evaluated across 15 datasets spanning general-purpose benchmarks, materials informatics, and nuclear-grade graphite characterization. Results demonstrate a total P@1 score of 0.9, with known nearest-neighbor retrieval and cluster structure remaining robust across embedding ablations and differential privacy budgets. The proposed framework provides a principled pathway for integrating heterogeneous numeric data into retrieval-augmented generation pipelines while preserving statistical context, with direct applications to data-driven algorithm selection and simulation model initialization for unknown datasets.

Frontier reasoning models are produced by posttraining base language models with reinforcement learning. Recent work has challenged this by showing that sampling from a sharpened version of the base model's distribution, a so-called power distribution, elicits comparable reasoning without additional training, curated datasets, or verifiers. However, making this method practical requires efficiently sampling from the power distribution. A sampler needs to "mix" to the power distribution, which necessitates moving between modes of the target distribution; intuitively, e.g., trying different reasoning strategies. The samplers proposed in prior works repeatedly select a "cut" position in the current reasoning trace uniformly at random and resample the suffix from that position onward. However, reasoning traces typically contain a few consequential decisions (e.g., the choice of proof strategy or algorithm), and we observe that a uniformly chosen cut tends to rewrite local details rather than revisit decision points. We introduce an algorithm (Entropy-Cut Metropolis-Hastings) that uses the base model's next-token entropy as a proxy to identify key decision points and resample from those positions. We empirically verify that entropy jumps are a useful proxy for decision points and, in a stylized model of reasoning, prove that our method's mixing time scales with the number of decisions in a trace rather than with the number of tokens, which can be much larger. Across MATH500, HumanEval, GPQA Diamond, and AIME26, our method consistently improves over baselines and RL-trained models.