This paper presents a novel approach for explainability in financial analysis by deriving financially-explainable statistical relationships through aspect-based sentiment analysis, Pearson correlation, Granger causality & uncertainty coefficient. The proposed methodology involves constructing an aspect list from financial literature and applying aspect-based sentiment analysis on social media text to compute sentiment scores for each aspect. Pearson correlation is then applied to uncover financially explainable relationships between aspect sentiment scores and stock prices. Findings for derived relationships are made robust by applying Granger causality to determine the forecasting ability of each aspect sentiment score for stock prices. Finally, an added layer of interpretability is added by evaluating uncertainty coefficient scores between aspect sentiment scores and stock prices. This allows us to determine the aspects whose sentiment scores are most statistically significant for stock prices. Relative to other methods, our approach provides a more informative and accurate understanding of the relationship between sentiment analysis and stock prices. Specifically, this methodology enables an interpretation of the statistical relationship between aspect-based sentiment scores and stock prices, which offers explainability to AI-driven financial decision-making.

Continual learning (CL) has two main objectives: preventing catastrophic forgetting (CF) and encouraging knowledge transfer (KT). The existing literature mainly focused on overcoming CF. Some work has also been done on KT when the tasks are similar. To our knowledge, only one method has been proposed to learn a sequence of mixed tasks. However, these techniques still suffer from CF and/or limited KT. This paper proposes a new CL method to achieve both. It overcomes CF by isolating the knowledge of each task via discovering a subnetwork for it. A soft-masking mechanism is also proposed to preserve the previous knowledge and to enable the new task to leverage the past knowledge to achieve KT. Experiments using classification, generation, information extraction, and their mixture (i.e., heterogeneous tasks) show that the proposed method consistently outperforms strong baselines.

The term emotion analysis in text subsumes various natural language processing tasks which have in common the goal to enable computers to understand emotions. Most popular is emotion classification in which one or multiple emotions are assigned to a predefined textual unit. While such setting is appropriate for identifying the reader's or author's emotion, emotion role labeling adds the perspective of mentioned entities and extracts text spans that correspond to the emotion cause. The underlying emotion theories agree on one important point; that an emotion is caused by some internal or external event and comprises several subcomponents, including the subjective feeling and a cognitive evaluation. We therefore argue that emotions and events are related in two ways. (1) Emotions are events; and this perspective is the fundament in natural language processing for emotion role labeling. (2) Emotions are caused by events; a perspective that is made explicit with research how to incorporate psychological appraisal theories in NLP models to interpret events. These two research directions, role labeling and (event-focused) emotion classification, have by and large been tackled separately. In this paper, we contextualize both perspectives and discuss open research questions.

Researchers commonly perform sentiment analysis on large collections of short texts like tweets, Reddit posts or newspaper headlines that are all focused on a specific topic, theme or event. Usually, general purpose sentiment analysis methods are used which perform well on average but miss the variation in meaning that happens across different contexts, for example, the word "active" has a very different intention and valence in the phrase "active lifestyle" versus "active volcano". This work presents a new approach, CIDER (Context Informed Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner), which performs context sensitive sentiment analysis, where the valence of sentiment laden terms is inferred from the whole corpus before being used to score the individual texts. In this paper we detail the CIDER algorithm and demonstrate that it outperforms state-of-the-art generalist sentiment analysis on a large collection of tweets about the weather. We have made our implementation of CIDER available as a python package: https://pypi.org/project/ciderpolarity/.

Product attribute value extraction plays an important role for many real-world applications in e-Commerce such as product search and recommendation. Previous methods treat it as a sequence labeling task that needs more annotation for position of values in the product text. This limits their application to real-world scenario in which only attribute values are weakly-annotated for each product without their position. Moreover, these methods only use product text (i.e., product title and description) and do not consider the semantic connection between the multiple attribute values of a given product and its text, which can help attribute value extraction. In this paper, we reformulate this task as a multi-label classification task that can be applied for real-world scenario in which only annotation of attribute values is available to train models (i.e., annotation of positional information of attribute values is not available). We propose a classification model with semantic matching and negative label sampling for attribute value extraction. Semantic matching aims to capture semantic interactions between attribute values of a given product and its text. Negative label sampling aims to enhance the model's ability of distinguishing similar values belonging to the same attribute. Experimental results on three subsets of a large real-world e-Commerce dataset demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed model.

Traditional methods of collecting user feedback through transit surveys are often time-consuming, resource intensive, and costly. In this paper, we propose a novel NLP-based framework that harnesses the vast, abundant, and inexpensive data available on social media platforms like Twitter to understand users' perceptions of various service issues. Twitter, being a microblogging platform, hosts a wealth of real-time user-generated content that often includes valuable feedback and opinions on various products, services, and experiences. The proposed framework streamlines the process of gathering and analyzing user feedback without the need for costly and time-consuming user feedback surveys using two techniques. First, it utilizes few-shot learning for tweet classification within predefined categories, allowing effective identification of the issues described in tweets. It then employs a lexicon-based sentiment analysis model to assess the intensity and polarity of the tweet sentiments, distinguishing between positive, negative, and neutral tweets. The effectiveness of the framework was validated on a subset of manually labeled Twitter data and was applied to the NYC subway system as a case study. The framework accurately classifies tweets into predefined categories related to safety, reliability, and maintenance of the subway system and effectively measured sentiment intensities within each category. The general findings were corroborated through a comparison with an agency-run customer survey conducted in the same year. The findings highlight the effectiveness of the proposed framework in gauging user feedback through inexpensive social media data to understand the pain points of the transit system and plan for targeted improvements.

Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) is a widely studied topic, most often trained through supervision from human annotations of opinionated texts. These fine-grained annotations include identifying aspects towards which a user expresses their sentiment, and their associated polarities (aspect-based sentiments). Such fine-grained annotations can be expensive and often infeasible to obtain in real-world settings. There is, however, an abundance of scenarios where user-generated text contains an overall sentiment, such as a rating of 1-5 in user reviews or user-generated feedback, which may be leveraged for this task. In this paper, we propose a VAE-based topic modeling approach that performs ABSA using document-level supervision and without requiring fine-grained labels for either aspects or sentiments. Our approach allows for the detection of multiple aspects in a document, thereby allowing for the possibility of reasoning about how sentiment expressed through multiple aspects comes together to form an observable overall document-level sentiment. We demonstrate results on two benchmark datasets from two different domains, significantly outperforming a state-of-the-art baseline.

Counterfactually-Augmented Data (CAD) -- minimal editing of sentences to flip the corresponding labels -- has the potential to improve the Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) generalization capability of language models, as CAD induces language models to exploit domain-independent causal features and exclude spurious correlations. However, the empirical results of CAD's OOD generalization are not as efficient as anticipated. In this study, we attribute the inefficiency to the myopia phenomenon caused by CAD: language models only focus on causal features that are edited in the augmentation operation and exclude other non-edited causal features. Therefore, the potential of CAD is not fully exploited. To address this issue, we analyze the myopia phenomenon in feature space from the perspective of Fisher's Linear Discriminant, then we introduce two additional constraints based on CAD's structural properties (dataset-level and sentence-level) to help language models extract more complete causal features in CAD, thereby mitigating the myopia phenomenon and improving OOD generalization capability. We evaluate our method on two tasks: Sentiment Analysis and Natural Language Inference, and the experimental results demonstrate that our method could unlock the potential of CAD and improve the OOD generalization performance of language models by 1.0% to 5.9%.

Multimodal information extraction is attracting research attention nowadays, which requires aggregating representations from different modalities. In this paper, we present the Intra- and Inter-Sample Relationship Modeling (I2SRM) method for this task, which contains two modules. Firstly, the intra-sample relationship modeling module operates on a single sample and aims to learn effective representations. Embeddings from textual and visual modalities are shifted to bridge the modality gap caused by distinct pre-trained language and image models. Secondly, the inter-sample relationship modeling module considers relationships among multiple samples and focuses on capturing the interactions. An AttnMixup strategy is proposed, which not only enables collaboration among samples but also augments data to improve generalization. We conduct extensive experiments on the multimodal named entity recognition datasets Twitter-2015 and Twitter-2017, and the multimodal relation extraction dataset MNRE. Our proposed method I2SRM achieves competitive results, 77.12% F1-score on Twitter-2015, 88.40% F1-score on Twitter-2017, and 84.12% F1-score on MNRE.

This paper proposes a method of abstractive summarization designed to scale to document collections instead of individual documents. Our approach applies a combination of semantic clustering, document size reduction within topic clusters, semantic chunking of a cluster's documents, GPT-based summarization and concatenation, and a combined sentiment and text visualization of each topic to support exploratory data analysis. Statistical comparison of our results to existing state-of-the-art systems BART, BRIO, PEGASUS, and MoCa using ROGUE summary scores showed statistically equivalent performance with BART and PEGASUS on the CNN/Daily Mail test dataset, and with BART on the Gigaword test dataset. This finding is promising since we view document collection summarization as more challenging than individual document summarization. We conclude with a discussion of how issues of scale are