Community Question Answering (cQA) provides new interesting research directions to the traditional Question Answering (QA) field, e.g., the exploitation of the interaction between users and the structure of related posts. In this context, we organized SemEval-2015 Task 3 on "Answer Selection in cQA", which included two subtasks: (a) classifying answers as "good", "bad", or "potentially relevant" with respect to the question, and (b) answering a YES/NO question with "yes", "no", or "unsure", based on the list of all answers. We set subtask A for Arabic and English on two relatively different cQA domains, i.e., the Qatar Living website for English, and a Quran-related website for Arabic. We used crowdsourcing on Amazon Mechanical Turk to label a large English training dataset, which we released to the research community. Thirteen teams participated in the challenge with a total of 61 submissions: 24 primary and 37 contrastive. The best systems achieved an official score (macro-averaged F1) of 57.19 and 63.7 for the English subtasks A and B, and 78.55 for the Arabic subtask A.

The phenomenon of ellipsis is prevalent in social conversations. Ellipsis increases the difficulty of a series of downstream language understanding tasks, such as dialog act prediction and semantic role labeling. We propose to resolve ellipsis through automatic sentence completion to improve language understanding. However, automatic ellipsis completion can result in output which does not accurately reflect user intent. To address this issue, we propose a method which considers both the original utterance that has ellipsis and the automatically completed utterance in dialog act and semantic role labeling tasks. Specifically, we first complete user utterances to resolve ellipsis using an end-to-end pointer network model. We then train a prediction model using both utterances containing ellipsis and our automatically completed utterances. Finally, we combine the prediction results from these two utterances using a selection model that is guided by expert knowledge. Our approach improves dialog act prediction and semantic role labeling by 1.3% and 2.5% in F1 score respectively in social conversations. We also present an open-domain human-machine conversation dataset with manually completed user utterances and annotated semantic role labeling after manual completion. Introduction Ellipsis, in which a speaker omits words that are understood from context, is a frequent phenomenon in human conversation. Although natural to humans, ellipsis poses a challenge for language understanding in spoken dialog systems.

The French RoBERTa, aka CamemBERT, is now part of Hugging Face's transformer library. The transformer achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on several NLP downstream tasks: part-of-speech tagging, dependency parsing, named-entity recognition, and natural language inference in French. Need a cheat-sheet for data science or ML? Thanks to this fellow, the biggest payload of cheat sheets in the galaxy covers several programming languages and use-cases is easily accessible on GitHub. One of the biggest retailers on planet Earth is turning to Conversational AI. This past week Walmart announced its partnership with Apple's Siri for peeps looking to buy groceries online -- the service is called Walmart Voice Order.

How does Text Analysis work?

Anaphora resolution is a challenging task which has been the interest of NLP researchers for a long time. Traditional resolution techniques like eliminative constraints and weighted preferences were successful in many languages. However, they are ineffective in free word order languages like most SouthAsian languages.Heuristic and rule-based techniques were typical in these languages, which are constrained to context and domain.In this paper, we venture a new strategy us-ing neural networks for resolving anaphora in human-human dialogues. The architecture chiefly consists of three components, a shallow parser for extracting features, a feature vector generator which produces the word embed-dings, and a neural network model which will predict the antecedent mention of an anaphora.The system has been trained and tested on Telugu conversation corpus we generated. Given the advantage of the semantic information in word embeddings and appending actor, gender, number, person and part of plural features the model has reached an F1-score of 86.

When translating natural language questions into SQL queries to answer questions from a database, contemporary semantic parsing models struggle to generalize to unseen database schemas. The generalization challenge lies in (a) encoding the database relations in an accessible way for the semantic parser, and (b) modeling alignment between database columns and their mentions in a given query. We present a unified framework, based on the relation-aware self-attention mechanism, to address schema encoding, schema linking, and feature representation within a text-to-SQL encoder. On the challenging Spider dataset this framework boosts the exact match accuracy to 53.7%, compared to 47.4% for the state-of-the-art model unaugmented with BERT em-beddings. In addition, we observe qualitative improvements in the model's understanding of schema linking and alignment.

An increasing number of works in natural language processing have addressed the effect of bias on the predicted outcomes, introducing mitigation techniques that act on different parts of the standard NLP pipeline (data and models). However, these works have been conducted in isolation, without a unifying framework to organize efforts within the field. This leads to repetitive approaches, and puts an undue focus on the effects of bias, rather than on their origins. Research focused on bias symptoms rather than the underlying origins could limit the development of effective countermeasures. In this paper, we propose a unifying conceptualization: the predictive bias framework for NLP . We summarize the NLP literature and propose a general mathematical definition of predictive bias in NLP along with a conceptual framework, differentiating four main origins of biases: label bias, selection bias, model overamplification, and semantic bias . We discuss how past work has countered each bias origin. Our framework serves to guide an introductory overview of predictive bias in NLP, integrating existing work into a single structure and opening avenues for future research.

PDFs, scans) into hierarchical structures is extensively demanded in the daily routines of many real-world applications, and is often a prerequisite step of many downstream NLP tasks. Earlier attempts focused on different but simpler tasks such as the detection of table or cell locations within documents; however, a holistic, principled approach to inferring the complete hierarchical structure in documents is missing. As a remedy, we developed "Doc-Parser": an end-to-end system for parsing the complete document structure - including all text elements, figures, tables, and table cell structures. To the best of our knowledge, Doc-Parser is the first system that derives the full hierarchical document compositions. Given the complexity of the task, annotating appropriate datasets is costly. Therefore, our second contribution is to provide a dataset for evaluating hierarchical document structure parsing. Our third contribution is to propose a scalable learning framework for settings where domain-specific data is scarce, which we address by a novel approach to weak supervision. Our computational experiments confirm the effectiveness of our proposed weak supervision: Compared to the baseline without weak supervision, it improves the mean average precision for detecting document entities by 37.1 % . When classifying hierarchical relations between entity pairs, it improves the F1 score by 27.6 % . 1 Introduction

We present VASTA, a novel vision and language-assisted Programming By Demonstration (PBD) system for smartphone task automation. Development of a robust PBD automation system requires overcoming three key challenges: first, how to make a particular demonstration robust to positional and visual changes in the user interface (UI) elements; secondly, how to recognize changes in the automation parameters to make the demonstration as generalizable as possible; and thirdly, how to recognize from the user utterance what automation the user wishes to carry out. To address the first challenge, VASTA leverages state-of-the-art computer vision techniques, including object detection and optical character recognition, to accurately label interactions demonstrated by a user, without relying on the underlying UI structures. To address the second and third challenges, VASTA takes advantage of advanced natural language understanding algorithms for analyzing the user utterance to trigger the VASTA automation scripts, and to determine the automation parameters for generalization. We run an initial user study that demonstrates the effectiveness of VASTA at clustering user utterances, understanding changes in the automation parameters, detecting desired UI elements, and, most importantly, automating various tasks. A demo video of the system is available here: http://y2u.be/kr2xE-FixjI

They can take many forms, ranging from everyday explanations for questions such as why one likes Star Wars, to sophisticated formalization in the philosophy of science (Salmon, 2006), to simply highlighting features in recent work on interpretable machine learning (Ribeiro et al., 2016). Although everyday explanations are mostly encoded in natural language, natural language explanations remain understudied in NLP, partly due to a lack of appropriate datasets and problem formulations. To address these challenges, we leverage /r/ChangeMyView, a community dedicated to sharing counterarguments to controversial views on Reddit, to build a sizable dataset of naturally-occurring explanations. Specifically, in /r/ChangeMyView, an original poster (OP) first delineates the rationales for a (controversial) opinion (e.g., in Table 1, "most hit music artists today are bad musicians"). Members of /r/ChangeMyVieware invited to provide counterarguments. If a counterargument changes the OP's view, the OP awards a to indicate the change and is required to explain why the counterargument is persuasive . In this work, we refer to what is being explained, including both the original post and the persuasive comment, as the explanandum.