Dialogue systems is an increasingly popular task of natural language processing. However, the dialogue paths tend to be deterministic, restricted to the system rails, regardless of the given request or input text. Recent advances in program synthesis have led to systems which can synthesize programs from very general search spaces, e.g. Programming by Example, and to systems with very accessible interfaces for writing programs, e.g. text-to-code translation, but have not achieved both of these qualities in the same system. We propose Modular Programs for Text-guided Hierarchical Synthesis (MPaTHS), a method for integrating Programming by Example and text-to-code systems which offers an accessible natural language interface for synthesizing general programs. We present a program representation that allows our method to be applied to the problem of task-oriented dialogue. Finally, we demo MPaTHS using our program representation.

The task of text-to-SQL parsing, which aims at converting natural language questions into executable SQL queries, has garnered increasing attention in recent years, as it can assist end users in efficiently extracting vital information from databases without the need for technical background. One of the major challenges in text-to-SQL parsing is domain generalization, i.e., how to generalize well to unseen databases. Recently, the pre-trained text-to-text transformer model, namely T5, though not specialized for text-to-SQL parsing, has achieved state-of-the-art performance on standard benchmarks targeting domain generalization. In this work, we explore ways to further augment the pre-trained T5 model with specialized components for text-to-SQL parsing. Such components are expected to introduce structural inductive bias into text-to-SQL parsers thus improving model's capacity on (potentially multi-hop) reasoning, which is critical for generating structure-rich SQLs. To this end, we propose a new architecture GRAPHIX-T5, a mixed model with the standard pre-trained transformer model augmented by some specially-designed graph-aware layers. Extensive experiments and analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of GRAPHIX-T5 across four text-to-SQL benchmarks: SPIDER, SYN, REALISTIC and DK. GRAPHIX-T5 surpass all other T5-based parsers with a significant margin, achieving new state-of-the-art performance. Notably, GRAPHIX-T5-large reach performance superior to the original T5-large by 5.7% on exact match (EM) accuracy and 6.6% on execution accuracy (EX). This even outperforms the T5-3B by 1.2% on EM and 1.5% on EX.

Many types of data from fields including natural language processing, computer vision, and bioinformatics, are well represented by discrete, compositional structures such as trees, sequences, or matchings. Latent structure models are a powerful tool for learning to extract such representations, offering a way to incorporate structural bias, discover insight about the data, and interpret decisions. However, effective training is challenging, as neural networks are typically designed for continuous computation. This text explores three broad strategies for learning with discrete latent structure: continuous relaxation, surrogate gradients, and probabilistic estimation. Our presentation relies on consistent notations for a wide range of models. As such, we reveal many new connections between latent structure learning strategies, showing how most consist of the same small set of fundamental building blocks, but use them differently, leading to substantially different applicability and properties.

Open Information Extraction models have shown promising results with sufficient supervision. However, these models face a fundamental challenge that the syntactic distribution of training data is partially observable in comparison to the real world. In this paper, we propose a syntactically robust training framework that enables models to be trained on a syntactic-abundant distribution based on diverse paraphrase generation. To tackle the intrinsic problem of knowledge deformation of paraphrasing, two algorithms based on semantic similarity matching and syntactic tree walking are used to restore the expressionally transformed knowledge. The training framework can be generally applied to other syntactic partial observable domains. Based on the proposed framework, we build a new evaluation set called CaRB-AutoPara, a syntactically diverse dataset consistent with the real-world setting for validating the robustness of the models. Experiments including a thorough analysis show that the performance of the model degrades with the increase of the difference in syntactic distribution, while our framework gives a robust boundary. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/qijimrc/RobustOIE.

NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a powerful library in Python that provides tools to work with human language data (text). It has modules for various tasks such as tokenization, stemming, and part-of-speech tagging, as well as many others. One of the great things about NLTK is that it comes with a lot of corpora (large datasets) that you can use to train and test your models. Some examples of these include the Brown Corpus, which is a collection of text from a variety of sources, and the Penn Treebank, which is a set of treebanks (syntax trees) from the University of Pennsylvania. Let's start by installing NLTK and downloading the necessary corpora.

Language is a multilevel symbolic system that includes multiple levels: phonetics, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. The most basic language symbols can be combined to form more complex and endless symbol sequences to allow flexible expression of meaning. As such, language is also considered the carrier of human thought and the most natural tool through which humans exchange ideas and express emotions. Because of the diverse and flexible characteristics of language, it is difficult to study the mechanism of human language understanding and to build a computation model that can understand language. In the early days of computer science, language research pioneers attempted to conduct cross-disciplinary research in computer science, linguistics, and cognitive science. They aimed to establish connections between human language-understanding mechanisms and language-computation models [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. However, owing to the complexity of the problem, interdisciplinary research has gradually become separated over the decades, forming subfields such as natural language understanding in computer science, psycholinguistics in cognitive psychology, and neurobiology of language research in cognitive neuroscience. In this paper, "cognitive science" mainly refers to the two fields of cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience, particularly the branches of psycholinguistics and the cognitive neuroscience of language [7]. Figure 1 shows the relationship between cognitive and computer science in the direction of language understanding. There are substantial differences in the research questions and methods adopted in the two fields.

This dissertation proposes a framework of user-centered security in Natural Language Processing (NLP), and demonstrates how it can improve the accessibility of related research. Accordingly, it focuses on two security domains within NLP with great public interest. First, that of author profiling, which can be employed to compromise online privacy through invasive inferences. Without access and detailed insight into these models' predictions, there is no reasonable heuristic by which Internet users might defend themselves from such inferences. Secondly, that of cyberbullying detection, which by default presupposes a centralized implementation; i.e., content moderation across social platforms. As access to appropriate data is restricted, and the nature of the task rapidly evolves (both through lexical variation, and cultural shifts), the effectiveness of its classifiers is greatly diminished and thereby often misrepresented. Under the proposed framework, we predominantly investigate the use of adversarial attacks on language; i.e., changing a given input (generating adversarial samples) such that a given model does not function as intended. These attacks form a common thread between our user-centered security problems; they are highly relevant for privacy-preserving obfuscation methods against author profiling, and adversarial samples might also prove useful to assess the influence of lexical variation and augmentation on cyberbullying detection.

Traditional English readability formulas, or equations, were largely developed in the 20th century. Nonetheless, many researchers still rely on them for various NLP applications. This phenomenon is presumably due to the convenience and straightforwardness of readability formulas. In this work, we contribute to the NLP community by 1. introducing New English Readability Formula (NERF), 2. recalibrating the coefficients of old readability formulas (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Fog Index, SMOG Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and Automated Readability Index), 3. evaluating the readability formulas, for use in text simplification studies and medical texts, and 4. developing a Python-based program for the wide application to various NLP projects.

Recent work on unsupervised speech segmentation has used self-supervised models with phone and word segmentation modules that are trained jointly. This paper instead revisits an older approach to word segmentation: bottom-up phone-like unit discovery is performed first, and symbolic word segmentation is then performed on top of the discovered units (without influencing the lower level). To do this, I propose a new unit discovery model, a new symbolic word segmentation model, and then chain the two models to segment speech. Both models use dynamic programming to minimize segment costs from a self-supervised network with an additional duration penalty that encourages longer units. Concretely, for acoustic unit discovery, duration-penalized dynamic programming (DPDP) is used with a contrastive predictive coding model as the scoring network. For word segmentation, DPDP is applied with an autoencoding recurrent neural as the scoring network. The two models are chained in order to segment speech. This approach gives comparable word segmentation results to state-of-the-art joint self-supervised segmentation models on an English benchmark. On French, Mandarin, German and Wolof data, it outperforms previous systems on the ZeroSpeech benchmarks. Analysis shows that the chained DPDP system segments shorter filler words well, but longer words might require some external top-down signal.

The ability to generalise well is one of the primary desiderata of natural language processing (NLP). Yet, what 'good generalisation' entails and how it should be evaluated is not well understood, nor are there any evaluation standards for generalisation. In this paper, we lay the groundwork to address both of these issues. We present a taxonomy for characterising and understanding generalisation research in NLP. Our taxonomy is based on an extensive literature review of generalisation research, and contains five axes along which studies can differ: their main motivation, the type of generalisation they investigate, the type of data shift they consider, the source of this data shift, and the locus of the shift within the modelling pipeline. We use our taxonomy to classify over 400 papers that test generalisation, for a total of more than 600 individual experiments. Considering the results of this review, we present an in-depth analysis that maps out the current state of generalisation research in NLP, and we make recommendations for which areas might deserve attention in the future. Along with this paper, we release a webpage where the results of our review can be dynamically explored, and which we intend to update as new NLP generalisation studies are published. With this work, we aim to take steps towards making state-of-the-art generalisation testing the new status quo in NLP.