Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Unsupervised or Indirectly Supervised Learning


Industry Scale Semi-Supervised Learning for Natural Language Understanding

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

This paper presents a production Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) pipeline based on the student-teacher framework, which leverages millions of unlabeled examples to improve Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks. We investigate two questions related to the use of unlabeled data in production SSL context: 1) how to select samples from a huge unlabeled data pool that are beneficial for SSL training, and 2) how do the selected data affect the performance of different state-of-the-art SSL techniques. We compare four widely used SSL techniques, Pseudo-Label (PL), Knowledge Distillation (KD), Virtual Adversarial Training (VAT) and Cross-View Training (CVT) in conjunction with two data selection methods including committee-based selection and submodular optimization based selection. We further examine the benefits and drawbacks of these techniques when applied to intent classification (IC) and named entity recognition (NER) tasks, and provide guidelines specifying when each of these methods might be beneficial to improve large scale NLU systems.


Unsupervised Learning -- A Complete Overview

#artificialintelligence

It is a Machine Learning technique in which instead of learning from training dataset(as in supervised learning), here model itself find hidden patterns and insights from the data. It create groups based on some similarity even without knowing what each group represent. In this article i will not explain each and every thing in brief, i will only give an short overview about the different types of unsupervised learning. Most of time peoples ask me what is Unsupervised Learning and how many types of it, i googled it but didn't get an perfect answers of this question this is only my motto of writing this article. Example: Suppose we have group of students belongs to different university's and we have to group them based on some feature, now we give this responsibility to unsupervised algorithms.


Modeling the Compatibility of Stem Tracks to Generate Music Mashups

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

A music mashup combines audio elements from two or more songs to create a new work. To reduce the time and effort required to make them, researchers have developed algorithms that predict the compatibility of audio elements. Prior work has focused on mixing unaltered excerpts, but advances in source separation enable the creation of mashups from isolated stems (e.g., vocals, drums, bass, etc.). In this work, we take advantage of separated stems not just for creating mashups, but for training a model that predicts the mutual compatibility of groups of excerpts, using self-supervised and semi-supervised methods. Specifically, we first produce a random mashup creation pipeline that combines stem tracks obtained via source separation, with key and tempo automatically adjusted to match, since these are prerequisites for high-quality mashups. To train a model to predict compatibility, we use stem tracks obtained from the same song as positive examples, and random combinations of stems with key and/or tempo unadjusted as negative examples. To improve the model and use more data, we also train on "average" examples: random combinations with matching key and tempo, where we treat them as unlabeled data as their true compatibility is unknown. To determine whether the combined signal or the set of stem signals is more indicative of the quality of the result, we experiment on two model architectures and train them using semi-supervised learning technique. Finally, we conduct objective and subjective evaluations of the system, comparing them to a standard rule-based system.


Machine Learning

#artificialintelligence

Machine learning algorithms all aim to learn and improve their accuracy as they process more datasets. One way that we can classify the tasks that machine learning algorithms solve is by how much feedback they present to the system. In some scenarios, the computer is provided a significant amount of labelled training data is provided, which is called supervised learning. In other cases, no labelled data is provided and this is known as unsupervised learning. Lastly, in semi-supervised learning, some labelled training data is provided, but most of the training data is unlabelled.


Consistency-based Active Learning for Object Detection

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Active learning aims to improve the performance of task model by selecting the most informative samples with a limited budget. Unlike most recent works that focused on applying active learning for image classification, we propose an effective Consistency-based Active Learning method for object Detection (CALD), which fully explores the consistency between original and augmented data. CALD has three appealing benefits. (i) CALD is systematically designed by investigating the weaknesses of existing active learning methods, which do not take the unique challenges of object detection into account. (ii) CALD unifies box regression and classification with a single metric, which is not concerned by active learning methods for classification. CALD also focuses on the most informative local region rather than the whole image, which is beneficial for object detection. (iii) CALD not only gauges individual information for sample selection, but also leverages mutual information to encourage a balanced data distribution. Extensive experiments show that CALD significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art task-agnostic and detection-specific active learning methods on general object detection datasets. Based on the Faster R-CNN detector, CALD consistently surpasses the baseline method (random selection) by 2.9/2.8/0.8 mAP on average on PASCAL VOC 2007, PASCAL VOC 2012, and MS COCO. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/we1pingyu/CALD}


Incremental Semi-Supervised Learning Through Optimal Transport

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Semi-supervised learning has recently emerged as one of the most promising paradigms to mitigate the reliance of deep learning on huge amounts of labeled data, especially in learning tasks where it is costly to collect annotated data. This is best illustrated in medicine, where measurement require overpriced machinery and labels are the result of an expensive human assisted time-consuming analysis. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) aims to largely reduce the need for massive labeled datasets by allowing a model to leverage both labeled and unlabeled data. Among the many semi-supervised learning approaches, graph-based semi-supervised learning techniques are increasingly being studied due to their performance and to more and more real graph datasets. The problem is to predict all the unlabelled vertices in the graph based on only a small subset of vertices being observed. To date, a number of graph-based algorithms, in particular label propagation methods have been successfully applied to different fields, such as social network analysis [7][50][51][25], natural language processing [1][43][3], and image segmentation [47][10]. The performance of label propagation algorithms is often affected by the graph-construction method and the technique of inferring pseudo-labels.


SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detection

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We ask the following question: what training information is required to design an effective outlier/out-of-distribution (OOD) detector, i.e., detecting samples that lie far away from the training distribution? Since unlabeled data is easily accessible for many applications, the most compelling approach is to develop detectors based on only unlabeled in-distribution data. However, we observe that most existing detectors based on unlabeled data perform poorly, often equivalent to a random prediction. In contrast, existing state-of-the-art OOD detectors achieve impressive performance but require access to fine-grained data labels for supervised training. We propose SSD, an outlier detector based on only unlabeled in-distribution data. We use self-supervised representation learning followed by a Mahalanobis distance based detection in the feature space. We demonstrate that SSD outperforms most existing detectors based on unlabeled data by a large margin. Additionally, SSD even achieves performance on par, and sometimes even better, with supervised training based detectors. Finally, we expand our detection framework with two key extensions. First, we formulate few-shot OOD detection, in which the detector has access to only one to five samples from each class of the targeted OOD dataset. Second, we extend our framework to incorporate training data labels, if available. We find that our novel detection framework based on SSD displays enhanced performance with these extensions, and achieves state-of-the-art performance. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/inspire-group/SSD.


Instant-Teaching: An End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection Framework

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Supervised learning based object detection frameworks demand plenty of laborious manual annotations, which may not be practical in real applications. Semi-supervised object detection (SSOD) can effectively leverage unlabeled data to improve the model performance, which is of great significance for the application of object detection models. In this paper, we revisit SSOD and propose Instant-Teaching, a completely end-to-end and effective SSOD framework, which uses instant pseudo labeling with extended weak-strong data augmentations for teaching during each training iteration. To alleviate the confirmation bias problem and improve the quality of pseudo annotations, we further propose a co-rectify scheme based on Instant-Teaching, denoted as Instant-Teaching$^*$. Extensive experiments on both MS-COCO and PASCAL VOC datasets substantiate the superiority of our framework. Specifically, our method surpasses state-of-the-art methods by 4.2 mAP on MS-COCO when using $2\%$ labeled data. Even with full supervised information of MS-COCO, the proposed method still outperforms state-of-the-art methods by about 1.0 mAP. On PASCAL VOC, we can achieve more than 5 mAP improvement by applying VOC07 as labeled data and VOC12 as unlabeled data.


Unsupervised Learning: How Machines Learn on Their Own

#artificialintelligence

Exclusive clustering: As the name suggests, exclusive clustering specifies that a data point or object can exist only in one cluster. Hierarchical clustering: Hierarchical tries to create a hierarchy of clusters. There are two types of hierarchical clustering: agglomerative and divisive. Agglomerative follows the bottom-up approach, initially treats each data point as an individual cluster, and the pairs of clusters are merged as they move up the hierarchy. Divisive is the very opposite of agglomerative.


SPICE: Semantic Pseudo-labeling for Image Clustering

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

This paper presents SPICE, a Semantic Pseudo-labeling framework for Image ClustEring. Instead of using indirect loss functions required by the recently proposed methods, SPICE generates pseudo-labels via self-learning and directly uses the pseudo-label-based classification loss to train a deep clustering network. The basic idea of SPICE is to synergize the discrepancy among semantic clusters, the similarity among instance samples, and the semantic consistency of local samples in an embedding space to optimize the clustering network in a semantically-driven paradigm. Specifically, a semantic-similarity-based pseudo-labeling algorithm is first proposed to train a clustering network through unsupervised representation learning. Given the initial clustering results, a local semantic consistency principle is used to select a set of reliably labeled samples, and a semi-pseudo-labeling algorithm is adapted for performance boosting. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SPICE clearly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on six common benchmark datasets including STL10, Cifar10, Cifar100-20, ImageNet-10, ImageNet-Dog, and Tiny-ImageNet. On average, our SPICE method improves the current best results by about 10% in terms of adjusted rand index, normalized mutual information, and clustering accuracy.